Who's Toto Wolff?

Who's Toto Wolff?

Author
Discussion

Bo_apex

2,581 posts

219 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
Blink982 said:
It sounds like you just want to bash Mercedes and undermine their achievements..
You must've come across this poster before
Ahh, the old shoot the messenger routine biggrin

It's a non-story for Wolff fans. Call BusinessF1 and lodge your complaint wink




Bo_apex

2,581 posts

219 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
Leithen said:
FIA opens compliance investigation into potential Wolff conflict of interest

https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/fia-opens-compli...
triggered Gammon in 3.....2.....1.....


HighwayStar

4,315 posts

145 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
HighwayStar said:
Muzzer79 said:
Bo_apex said:
Mercedes is open about the fact that they were so far ahead of the 2014 engine regulations that the FIA came to them for advise on what else to do with the engine. The regulations didn't just suit them, they were tailor made for them to the Nth degree.
Source? Back-up? Evidence?

You've pedalled this line for years Sparta and never produced anything.

Let me guess - the info is out there and you expect me to go and find it to prove your assertion?

rolleyes
He is actually right on that point… I believe it was one their engine guys (maybe wrong) on Beyond The Grid podcast. They were surprised how far they were ahead with their engine. They did the best job.
Mercedes did the best job and were miles ahead of everyone else, that's correct.

But they didn't influence the FIA as to spec any more than any other team, didn't have this huge head start and didn't have regs "tailor made" to them.
They just did a better job than Ferrari, Renault and, latterly, Honda.

Can you imagine Ferrari of all teams allowing another team to influence the rules ahead of them? As if!
Oh I missed that point… I don’t agree Mercedes influenced the FIA re the engine spec. From what I remember the FIA originally wanted to go with a 4cyl lump, Ferrari objected. There was no 4 in there road car line up and didn’t want to be racing with one.
Here we go:
https://www.bbc.com/sport/formula1/13878359

As you say, all teams try to influence regulation changes.

HustleRussell

24,758 posts

161 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
Bo_apex said:
It's a non-story for Wolff fans.
You think I’m a ‘Wolff fan’? hehe

Change the record

Leithen

10,988 posts

268 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
Bo_apex said:
Leithen said:
FIA opens compliance investigation into potential Wolff conflict of interest

https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/fia-opens-compli...
triggered Gammon in 3.....2.....1.....
Refuted in the strongest terms by Mercedes and F1.

The FIA/F1 relationship reaches new depths…

Orchardab

452 posts

127 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
Leithen said:
Bo_apex said:
Leithen said:
FIA opens compliance investigation into potential Wolff conflict of interest

https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/fia-opens-compli...
triggered Gammon in 3.....2.....1.....
Refuted in the strongest terms by Mercedes and F1.

The FIA/F1 relationship reaches new depths…
If they are getting info, they are not using it very well!!

Derek Smith

45,778 posts

249 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
Bo_apex_nee_Sparta said:
Mercedes is open about the fact that they were so far ahead of the 2014 engine regulations that the FIA came to them for advise on what else to do with the engine. The regulations didn't just suit them, they were tailor made for them to the Nth degree.

Of course Mercedes then needed to do a secret test with Pirelli to get another helping hand on what the tyres would be like.
Not sure how Suzi being having access to restricted info in 2021 allowed Merc to gain any advantage forthe 2014 regs.

I'd advise you to seek advice before from an adult before posting.

Derek Smith

45,778 posts

249 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
I can understand the concern if Mrs W is privvy to restricted info. My personal opinion is that if it is correct then one or the other should not retain their position.

If it can be proven that Merc has been in receipt of this information before other teams, then there should be action taken. An extended period of disbarment from FIA motorsport perhaps?

If there's evidence of benefit, then that's a significantly more serious development, although there's been no suggestion of that, at least from any adult.

Dropped shoulders from Mr Wolff should not be considered as confirmation as that has been his normal stance for more than two seasons.

ch37

10,642 posts

222 months

Tuesday 5th December 2023
quotequote all
Assuming the very strong statements from Mercedes and Susie are correct and the first they or anyone heard of this was via the press...classic FIA.

Peacockantony

257 posts

160 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
This is exactly why it was never a good idea to give a job heading a subsidiary within FOM's group of companies to someone with links to an active senior figure falling under FOM's control, especially the spouse of the someone who is a large shareholder, CEO & Team Principal of a team competing in one of the most significant series the group owns...
Toto would be throwing even bigger tantrums than he has had it been someone with such close & numerous links to RBR or TR/AT.

This is why it was never a good idea to hire Susie when it was announced. Whether or not information was divulged, the link allows it to be a reasonable question to ask. Brawn, Domenicali had to shed ties with their former teams before getting their FOM roles, so did Todt in his FIA role. They have all been accused of bias as a result of their former roles. Derek Warrick is a driver advisor to the FIA stewards and is accused of being biased because he owns a car dealership that sells Honda cars alongside over brands of cars, including Mercedes...

I mean, Toto Wolff has repeatedly come out with tid-bits of information that should have you questioning whether a party or parties is/are divulging information to him that he should not be privy to:
- Mercedes conveniently had a floor stay ready a very short time after the FIA ok'ed them, before any other team could prepare
- Toto's weirdly close relationship with Michael Masi, dinner dates in late 2021 with him, his overly friendly radio messages to Masi
- Supposedly knew about Red Bull's overspend before it was announced
- Shaila-Ann Rao getting a job within the FIA
- Mercedes being given a performance advantage in regards to their engines by limiting competitors developing their engines via the token system

Those crying misogyny (how predictable!) are just trying to deflect from the fact that Toto has put his foot in it big style repeatedly and how questionable the links between Toto & Susie and both FOM & the FIA, both crucial parties in regards to F1.
The job offers she has been given are quite questionable, she literally can thank being Toto's wife for getting the development driver role & her FP1 outings within Williams that she wouldn't have got had Toto not been a shareholder. Her Formula E roles within Venturi doesn't help due to links to HWA Racelab that were responsible for Mercedes' DTM efforts & later became the Mercedes works Formula E Team.

Of course it being the FIA, it will be swept under the carpet & NDA's signed. Just like happened with the FIA attempted fix of the 2021 championship in favour of Hamilton that cost Masi his job, Mercedes' illegal tyre test & Ferrari's oil burning. The fact he has single-handedly brought the FIA into disrepute without so much as a wrist slap should be suspect!


Edited by Peacockantony on Wednesday 6th December 01:45

Pflanzgarten

3,995 posts

26 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
I’m not suggesting she has anything like the motorsport nouse as Suzi Wolf but if Geri Horner started getting roles with FOM or the FIA there’d have been more than eyebrows raised.


rscott

14,789 posts

192 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
ch37 said:
Assuming the very strong statements from Mercedes and Susie are correct and the first they or anyone heard of this was via the press...classic FIA.
F1 are saying the first they knew about it was via the media too - FIA didn't inform them either.

rscott

14,789 posts

192 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
Peacockantony said:
I mean, Toto Wolff has repeatedly come out with tid-bits of information that should have you questioning whether a party or parties is/are divulging information to him that he should not be privy to:
- Mercedes conveniently had a floor stay ready a very short time after the FIA ok'ed them, before any other team could prepare
- Toto's weirdly close relationship with Michael Masi, dinner dates in late 2021 with him, his overly friendly radio messages to Masi
- Supposedly knew about Red Bull's overspend before it was announced
- Shaila-Ann Rao getting a job within the FIA
- Mercedes being given a performance advantage in regards to their engines by limiting competitors developing their engines via the token system


Edited by Peacockantony on Wednesday 6th December 01:45
Mercedes were the ones asking if floor stays were permitted and the cost to produce was tiny, so why not have them ready if they think they're going to be approved?
You didn't hear the overly friendly radio messages from Horner to Masi in 2021 then.
Most reports put Binotto as the source of the leak, not Wolff.

Mrs Wolff is working for the F1 Academy so not involved in the day to say running of F1 and unlikely to have access to confidential information or the ability to influence rule changes.


Blib

44,291 posts

198 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
Peacockantony said:
This is exactly why it was never a good idea to give a job heading a subsidiary within FOM's group of companies to someone with links to an active senior figure falling under FOM's control, especially the spouse of the someone who is a large shareholder, CEO & Team Principal of a team competing in one of the most significant series the group owns...
Toto would be throwing even bigger tantrums than he has had it been someone with such close & numerous links to RBR or TR/AT.

This is why it was never a good idea to hire Susie when it was announced. Whether or not information was divulged, the link allows it to be a reasonable question to ask. Brawn, Domenicali had to shed ties with their former teams before getting their FOM roles, so did Todt in his FIA role. They have all been accused of bias as a result of their former roles. Derek Warrick is a driver advisor to the FIA stewards and is accused of being biased because he owns a car dealership that sells Honda cars alongside over brands of cars, including Mercedes...

I mean, Toto Wolff has repeatedly come out with tid-bits of information that should have you questioning whether a party or parties is/are divulging information to him that he should not be privy to:
- Mercedes conveniently had a floor stay ready a very short time after the FIA ok'ed them, before any other team could prepare
- Toto's weirdly close relationship with Michael Masi, dinner dates in late 2021 with him, his overly friendly radio messages to Masi
- Supposedly knew about Red Bull's overspend before it was announced
- Shaila-Ann Rao getting a job within the FIA
- Mercedes being given a performance advantage in regards to their engines by limiting competitors developing their engines via the token system

Those crying misogyny (how predictable!) are just trying to deflect from the fact that Toto has put his foot in it big style repeatedly and how questionable the links between Toto & Susie and both FOM & the FIA, both crucial parties in regards to F1.
The job offers she has been given are quite questionable, she literally can thank being Toto's wife for getting the development driver role & her FP1 outings within Williams that she wouldn't have got had Toto not been a shareholder. Her Formula E roles within Venturi doesn't help due to links to HWA Racelab that were responsible for Mercedes' DTM efforts & later became the Mercedes works Formula E Team.

Of course it being the FIA, it will be swept under the carpet & NDA's signed. Just like happened with the FIA attempted fix of the 2021 championship in favour of Hamilton that cost Masi his job, Mercedes' illegal tyre test & Ferrari's oil burning. The fact he has single-handedly brought the FIA into disrepute without so much as a wrist slap should be suspect!


Edited by Peacockantony on Wednesday 6th December 01:45
That particular one went well. yes

NRS

22,244 posts

202 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
Sometimes you think someone is making a fair point, then they come out with gold like that. The same person who oversaw AD21 and the gift to RB of the championship, not to mention the gift of points for Spa that year too is now being accused of being a Merc plant, lol.

HustleRussell

24,758 posts

161 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
Pflanzgarten said:
I’m not suggesting she has anything like the motorsport nouse as Suzi Wolf but if Geri Horner started getting roles with FOM or the FIA there’d have been more than eyebrows raised.
Are you seriously making that point?

Susie Wolff has had a lifelong career in professional motorsport. She has been Team principal as well as CEO of a Formula E team and Managing Director of the F1 Academy series.

davidd

6,456 posts

285 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
Pflanzgarten said:
I’m not suggesting she has anything like the motorsport nouse as Suzi Wolf but if Geri Horner started getting roles with FOM or the FIA there’d have been more than eyebrows raised.
To be fair she's probably a better racing driver than she is a singer.

deadslow

8,023 posts

224 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
Wolff is a venture capitalist. They do play very dirty, while their PR paints the opposite picture. Maybe Toto is different, maybe not. Hopefully it all (if anything at all) comes out.

Milkyway

9,488 posts

54 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
Showing my age, but can’t remember if Walter was his Father or Grandfather. scratchchin

Tim the pool man

4,881 posts

218 months

Wednesday 6th December 2023
quotequote all
Milkyway said:
Showing my age, but can’t remember if Walter was his Father or Grandfather. scratchchin
Neither? Different spelling and Walter was Canadian.