McLaren's new livery

McLaren's new livery

Author
Discussion

007 VXR

64,187 posts

188 months

Friday 8th May 2015
quotequote all
Fingers crossed its faster. Looking better after P2

slipstream 1985

12,231 posts

180 months

Friday 8th May 2015
quotequote all
ajprice said:
Dear Ron, can you leave the red flow vis paint on the car, it looks loads better with the red streaks all over it. Maybe it's the blood of anyone who said the word orange to Ron's face hehe

Looks like a cylon is in control.

Teppic

7,368 posts

258 months

Saturday 9th May 2015
quotequote all
The new livery is apparently 2kg lighter than the old one.

kiseca

9,339 posts

220 months

Saturday 9th May 2015
quotequote all
slipstream 1985 said:
Looks like a cylon is in control.
A cylon platypus..

ajprice

27,527 posts

197 months

Tuesday 12th May 2015
quotequote all
From the F1Technical forums, deliberate or coincidence?

[quote="Hail22"]Ah HA! I see a marketing tactic / ploy going on here with their livery:

So from the F1technical gallery we have this:



And then we have the rear of a Mclaren P1



I believe this may be the direction they're going, self advertising the motor car brand and if so its genius.
[/quote]

kiseca

9,339 posts

220 months

Tuesday 12th May 2015
quotequote all
ajprice said:
My money is on coincidence. Maybe it's on purpose but it's not a very strong resemblance and humans are programmed to seek patterns.

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

197 months

Tuesday 12th May 2015
quotequote all
Sky F1 reckoned the change of paint saved them 1kg and some glare in the drivers vision.

FourWheelDrift

88,556 posts

285 months

Tuesday 12th May 2015
quotequote all
I always thought all the cars were underweight anyway and needed ballast to make the minimum weight, all this running over rubber at the end of the race to add weight to make sure they aren't under. So saving weight on the paint is IMHO a red herring.

dr_gn

16,169 posts

185 months

Tuesday 12th May 2015
quotequote all
ajprice said:
From the F1Technical forums, deliberate or coincidence?

[quote="Hail22"]Ah HA! I see a marketing tactic / ploy going on here with their livery:

So from the F1technical gallery we have this:



And then we have the rear of a Mclaren P1



I believe this may be the direction they're going, self advertising the motor car brand and if so its genius.
Shame nobody will see the back of a McLaren for a very long time.

HarryFlatters

4,203 posts

213 months

Tuesday 12th May 2015
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
I always thought all the cars were underweight anyway and needed ballast to make the minimum weight, all this running over rubber at the end of the race to add weight to make sure they aren't under. So saving weight on the paint is IMHO a red herring.
Not really. I thought that they want the car to be as light as possible so that they can use the ballast lower on the car to lower it's CoG, and also to be able to move the ballast around to trim the balance of the car.

sleep envy

62,260 posts

250 months

Tuesday 12th May 2015
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Shame nobody will see the back of a McLaren for a very long time.
The front runners tend to lap them in short order.

Byker28i

60,154 posts

218 months

Tuesday 12th May 2015
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
Sky F1 reckoned the change of paint saved them 1kg and some glare in the drivers vision.
Button should use that as an excuse as to why he ran into...

kiseca

9,339 posts

220 months

Tuesday 12th May 2015
quotequote all
HarryFlatters said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I always thought all the cars were underweight anyway and needed ballast to make the minimum weight, all this running over rubber at the end of the race to add weight to make sure they aren't under. So saving weight on the paint is IMHO a red herring.
Not really. I thought that they want the car to be as light as possible so that they can use the ballast lower on the car to lower it's CoG, and also to be able to move the ballast around to trim the balance of the car.
As I saw a BMW engineer quoted once, it's not what it weighs,it's where it weighs.

I think what it weighs is important too but I take his point. The great thing about ballast is you can put it wherever you want and you can move it as needed from race to race (regulations permitting).

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 12th May 2015
quotequote all
kiseca said:
As I saw a BMW engineer quoted once, it's not what it weighs,it's where it weighs.

I think what it weighs is important too but I take his point. The great thing about ballast is you can put it wherever you want and you can move it as needed from race to race (regulations permitting).
Hence why the only ballast that cannot me moved, the driver, needs to be as light as possible.

rev-erend

21,421 posts

285 months

Wednesday 13th May 2015
quotequote all
That chrome paint was costing about 20K per car. Silly money.

hairyben

8,516 posts

184 months

Wednesday 13th May 2015
quotequote all
Seen from the front, in photo's at least, the red stripe/flash gives the nose of the car a "double bubble" effect that just looks awkward and ungainly