Mercedes to sue former employer

Mercedes to sue former employer

Author
Discussion

jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

213 months

Tuesday 8th December 2015
quotequote all
I'd say the are two reasons he has done this.

Either he's worried about performing in his new role at Ferrari, wants to glean over the data himself in order to appear cleverer than he really is in front of his new bosses.

Or, he has done this complicit with Ferrari and they already have the data.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 8th December 2015
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
One nasty aspect of this - if I've read it correctly - is that it seems that Merc is trying to bankrupt Hoyle. Perhaps it would have been better to go for discipline in the expectation that Hoyle would be banned from the sport for a season.
If the explanation of the details proves to be correct, then is that nasty? I don't think it is in the context of the severity of what has occurred to the potential losses to Mercedes. They obviously need to tighten up their IT security, but to gain access to what is alleged, post his removal from the F1 projects would take some effort and he would have known there would be serious consequences if caught.

What's equally as important, is the statement by Mercedes that Ferrari "have potentially gained an unlawful advantage". That is rather a serious statement to make.

Joratk

432 posts

111 months

Wednesday 9th December 2015
quotequote all
Seems as though he has took the hump over being segregated away from F1 activities and as such was looking to leave Merc with two fingers up. Hasn't worked out well for him at all.

suffolk009

5,430 posts

166 months

Wednesday 9th December 2015
quotequote all
Just seen on twitter Ferrari claiming that although they talked to him, no contract was signed and he won't be joining Ferrari in the near future.

andyps

7,817 posts

283 months

Wednesday 9th December 2015
quotequote all
Some more detail in this report - http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/analysis-mercede...

The allegations certainly make it appear he was making sure he got as much as possible in preparation for wherever he might have been going.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 9th December 2015
quotequote all
I think the only thing you can be sure of, is that NOBODY is telling the full truth in this one.........

Durzel

12,276 posts

169 months

Wednesday 9th December 2015
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
I think the only thing you can be sure of, is that NOBODY is telling the full truth in this one.........
+1

Ferrari would take the data if it were offered, I'd assume most teams would. The sport is too lucrative and competitive for them not to.

Mercedes will already have assumed that the data has been copied, analysed, etc, so are just punitively going after Hoyle. There is after all no practical value in him "giving back the data". They're probably looking to send a clear message to other employees who might have thought about this.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 9th December 2015
quotequote all
Unfortunately, for Ben, he's not going to be in a position to even contest the case. 1 individual against the legal might of well funded corporate lawyers. I think we can say justice will not be forthcoming in any circumstance......

rigga

8,732 posts

202 months

Wednesday 9th December 2015
quotequote all
suffolk009 said:
Just seen on twitter Ferrari claiming that although they talked to him, no contract was signed and he won't be joining Ferrari in the near future.
Shafted any which way, Ferrari washing their hands it seems

Jonesy23

4,650 posts

137 months

Wednesday 9th December 2015
quotequote all
So they say they wiped his laptop, restricted his IT access, restricted his building access, and moved him to work in another area of the business and he *still* managed to get their confidential data? If one takes this to be true (sounds a bit odd to me) then their procedures are pretty sloppy. Which I'm not sure I really believe.

Also sounds a bit odd the sheer number of things they claim data is on. I can understand a USB device or two or a memory card or two but this sounds like stuff was scattered everywhere? Also sounds like a pretty odd collection of data to grab.

As has been said though once the corporate legal team have it in for you it can be hard to get out of it even if you haven't really done anything.

Leroy902

1,540 posts

104 months

Wednesday 9th December 2015
quotequote all
Your making it sound like he's innocent?... and merely being stitched up by a big cooperation for no reason!?...

If he is guilty, and it sounds like it is the case, then he needs the book thrown at him, I'd lock the little st away for a year, It may even teach the youth of today the consequence of being a little weasel.

Max_Torque said:
Unfortunately, for Ben, he's not going to be in a position to even contest the case. 1 individual against the legal might of well funded corporate lawyers. I think we can say justice will not be forthcoming in any circumstance......

Doink

Original Poster:

1,652 posts

148 months

Wednesday 9th December 2015
quotequote all
The cynic in me says Ferrari have already seen this data, maybe they've already seen some benefit from it, maybe shell haven't found a 25% gain in fuel like they bust a gut in making sure everybody knew they had, maybe it was just a cover up, maybe Ferrari have welched on the job offer and are washing their hands of it now its all out in the open.

Non of this could be true of course just guess work

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 9th December 2015
quotequote all
Being friends with Ben i'm not going to comment any more, but lets just say, trust no-one, take everything you read, from either side with a pinch of salt. There is much more going on here than you might think at face value.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Being friends with Ben i'm not going to comment any more, but lets just say, trust no-one, take everything you read, from either side with a pinch of salt. There is much more going on here than you might think at face value.
OK, as one of his friends, can you answer this.

Given what has happened, would your friend have acted differently?

Way I see it, he must have done something to raise suspicion, and from the looks of it now, he's comprehensively stuffed with Ferrari having washed their hands of him.


anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Max_Torque said:
Being friends with Ben i'm not going to comment any more, but lets just say, trust no-one, take everything you read, from either side with a pinch of salt. There is much more going on here than you might think at face value.
Yes, trust no one; especially disloyal, thieving employees. I doubt Mercedes would take action for no reason against one from many employees who move on every year.

If the claim is spurious then he should resist it. They can't win without evidence of wrongdoing.

Bowler

905 posts

212 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
If something has been taken without permission, that's theft. Why isn't it subject to a criminal investigation?

Methinks someone's playing games here...

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Yes, because the Police are always right in-front of this stuff....rolleyes

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

229 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Extra wind tunnel data and power unit information for Ferrari then.

smile

mycool

268 posts

203 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
Is a possible reason for the lawsuit that it is a way of getting it in the public domain and therefore almost embarrassing/ daring Ferrari to use the data, if they have it? Is it also a way of clearly notifying the FIA of what has happened?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Thursday 10th December 2015
quotequote all
mycool said:
Is a possible reason for the lawsuit that it is a way of getting it in the public domain and therefore almost embarrassing/ daring Ferrari to use the data, if they have it? Is it also a way of clearly notifying the FIA of what has happened?
more likely they want the data destroyed and any copies made too.

A court order is a pretty good way to enforce this.

As for the FIA, I can pretty much garrentee that Ferrari will not be be subject to the kind of witch hunt McLaren were subjected to, and I bet they already have seen said data.