McLaren explore Mercedes engine option

McLaren explore Mercedes engine option

Author
Discussion

aeropilot

34,678 posts

228 months

Thursday 16th March 2017
quotequote all
lee_fr200 said:
aeropilot said:
lee_fr200 said:
They would never win another wdc and wcc while there's a merc works team!
They are never going to win another WDC/WCC with Honda either.
Why because the currently haven't got it good?
Honda aren't capable of getting it right IMHO, and I don't think they ever were likely to either, not under the current rules and regs. They are now even further behind than they were 3 years ago.
I think they now realise the situation they are in and are probably hugely regretting coming back.


skwdenyer

16,529 posts

241 months

Thursday 16th March 2017
quotequote all
rubystone said:
Under Ron second was never good enough. Under Mansour/Bahrainis, perhaps it is? Or perhaps even SuperZac needs results to attract the right partners (will they now drop that moniker too, I wonder?)

Or perhaps the hints that have been dropped about the divestment of the F1 team are true and they need results to build up the value of the team?

What is clear is that nothing will change this year. Others have said that it's a harmonic issue that's stopping Honda running the engines at full power. I'm guessing that for PR purposes they will indeed turn down the engines in Melbourne.
If divestment is an option, why did the shareholders turn down Ron's offer to buy?

revrange

1,182 posts

185 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
I gues they will go for a Williams model for a few seasons while trying to get BMW/Audi etc to enter with them once next engine reg is announced.

A Mclaren-Mercedes, keep Alonso (struggling to see where he goes?) is something at least superzac can sell and get a new title sponsor.

also would help boost price money with good results.

I would bet this is a very much a rocket up the arse to Honda as i would wager Woking isnt happy with the response.

James Allen suggested a disconnect between engineers in Japan/reality and what the bosses at Honda/honda are telling Mclaren is happening, if that is true this is only going one way.

spunkytherabbit

442 posts

181 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
rubystone said:
Under Ron second was never good enough. Under Mansour/Bahrainis, perhaps it is? Or perhaps even SuperZac needs results to attract the right partners (will they now drop that moniker too, I wonder?)

Or perhaps the hints that have been dropped about the divestment of the F1 team are true and they need results to build up the value of the team?

What is clear is that nothing will change this year. Others have said that it's a harmonic issue that's stopping Honda running the engines at full power. I'm guessing that for PR purposes they will indeed turn down the engines in Melbourne.
If divestment is an option, why did the shareholders turn down Ron's offer to buy?
A few factors:

1-Egos. An 'anyone but Ron no matter what the cost' attitude, made worse by the fact that the way Ron went about it amounted to a hostile takeover dressed up with a smile
2-It was felt that Ron's offer was below potential net market value of the F1 team if results were to improve this year and next and it was spun off through divestment once sponsors were back on board
3-Sponsors were never going to come back on board with Ron conducting negotiations thus preventing any chance of the value of the team increasing
4-People were just sick and tired of the situation, demoralised and stopping turning up for work day in day out as a result of the above and no end in sight for the Honda engine situation. Even at the end of last year.

2, 3 and 4 are from the mouth of a Mclaren employee and whilst he made sure to point out it was kitchen talk and not straight from the board room, it isn't idle gossip either given his day to day position in the race team.

rubystone

11,254 posts

260 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
If divestment is an option, why did the shareholders turn down Ron's offer to buy?
Because it was a deeply personal affair that, I'm told, goes back to the failure of his marriage on one side and on the other side his views on holding F1 races in Bahrain after the human rights issues there.

My understanding too is that the deal he came up with arrived after the deadline date; ergo they were under no compulsion to accept it. The die, as they say, was cast.

Note that his offer was for the entire group, not just the F1 team though. Not quite what the shareholders were expecting but typical of his business nous.

KarlMac

4,480 posts

142 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
lee_fr200 said:
They would never win another wdc and wcc while there's a merc works team!
Total speculation on my part, but maybe there some consideration for long term planning? Brawn's recent comments about changes to the Formula (I'm sure there was comments about standardising engines?) means that Mercedes maybe better placed as an engine supplier rather than a works team?

Either way, it would be incredibly daft for McLaren to not be looking for alternatives.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
lee_fr200 said:
Honda will come good, the last 2 yrs they blamed the token system this year they can go balls out now so it will be sorted I reckon! Look at how redbull slagged Renault off then looked daft when they couldn't go elsewhere!

Now they're back with Renault and last year after the upgrade the car was competitive come Monaco!

Honda will get there
The Token system didn't stop them researching, designing and building anything. All the Token system did was stop them introducing a major change during the season in a race.

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
Yusuke Hasegawa of Honda said:
Of course the situation we find ourselves in is not what we hoped for when we returned to Formula 1, but we are still 100 percent committed to our future in the sport and our relationship with McLaren.
More from https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/honda-remains-1...

Durzel

12,276 posts

169 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
This sort of thing is just posturing in my opinion, much like how Tesco "leaked" their spat with Unilever about them wanting to up the price of Marmite.

bigbarryfatbaps

14 posts

164 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all

DarthtaterM16

913 posts

103 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
bigbarryfatbaps said:
Blimey.

Something drastic happening regarding power units seems inevitable at this point.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
bigbarryfatbaps said:
Blinkin eck. Is that real?!

rubystone

11,254 posts

260 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
hornetrider said:
Blinkin eck. Is that real?!
what am I missing? It's an article from MClaren about the evolution of cars over the years isn't it? or is there more?

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
rubystone said:
what am I missing? It's an article from MClaren about the evolution of cars over the years isn't it? or is there more?
That's either and incredibly appalling PR department or the start of the end.

You don't release images like that today as you know that's going to be incendiary to Honda, if they wanted to reference the return to F1 of old they shouldn't use a narrow track Mercedes powered section of the car either, it would be more relevant to use a wide track McLaren Honda.

I'm sure Pirelli are delighted too.

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
They have just pulled it!

Oh deary me.

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

153 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
what was it?

and I presume you are sure it was their genuine feed?

Jez m

813 posts

196 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
Haha.. can see why they pulled it!

https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=d...

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
Vocal Minority said:
what was it?

and I presume you are sure it was their genuine feed?
Definitely genuine McL twitter account. Smarter cookies than me will be able to get it (or have probably already grabbed the screenshot).

Basically they spliced images together of McLaren F1 cars in profile through the generations to make one image of a car, they had the current front of the car in orange but the engine section was a couple of years old from the Mercedes era with Merc logos/branding etc. Titled the article something like 'the best of all worlds' or similar. Massive faux-pas hehe

Got it:



Whoops!

hornetrider

63,161 posts

206 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
Actually it linked to an article on their site which is still there at the moment

http://www.mclaren.com/formula1/inside-the-mtc/fou...

Not sure how long for though!!

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

153 months

Friday 17th March 2017
quotequote all
Ha!

Someone wasn't paying attention!