Alonso Missing Monaco to do Indy 500

Alonso Missing Monaco to do Indy 500

Author
Discussion

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

153 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
Simes205 said:
P1GTR at LM next year??
No class for it unfortunately

Otispunkmeyer

12,610 posts

156 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
Vocal Minority said:
Simes205 said:
P1GTR at LM next year??
No class for it unfortunately
Le Mans would likely be the hardest one for him to do, unless he gets into a team who've won consistently in the past. Even then, you have to rely on 2-3 other drivers to drive your car, rely on people not playing silly buggers in the dead of night and your car has to travel at 10/10ths for 24 hours without breaking.

Audi, who've won it countless times, didn't have a much of a good time last time out and we all know the heart ache for what happened to Toyota in the 23rd hour and 59th minute.

red_slr

17,266 posts

190 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
Otispunkmeyer said:
Some Gump said:
Why do peopl think of Monaco as the jewel in F's crown? Bling aside, it's a st event. Boring as hell every year, unless it rains enough that everyone but a Tyrell crashes (and these days they'd just run it under safety car instead).
Its total turd isn't it. And the cars are wider this year so it'll be even harder to make a move.

I realise why its on the calendar but they should do something else with it. Make it a non-championship race (perhaps chance to try some new ideas?) or something. Or maybe do it as an exhibition type event, like Goodwood. Everyone gets a few goes round the track at full pelt, on fumes. Best aggregate of times wins. Rest of the event is like a motor show... people can go down into the paddock and get up close etc, go see yachts, generally have a good time.
I think its one of the best races all year. Something almost always happens, drivers want to win there so risk the barriers. Driver skill can shake up the field. There is no room for mistake and tech advances play less of a part. I watch every race but Monaco is the one I always watch all of the TV coverage including FP1/2/3.

InductionRoar

2,014 posts

133 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
So basically the odds of Fernando winning at Monaco remain the same and he has the potential to join an exclusive list of drivers, whilst attracting new fans to Indy 500 (I shall certainly watch it).

towser44

Original Poster:

3,496 posts

116 months

Wednesday 12th April 2017
quotequote all
aeropilot said:
FourWheelDrift said:
I love the comment from someone pointing out that Monaco is the same weekend as the WRX at Lydden Hill, and to tell JB to come and have some fun rather than be in Monaco laugh
Have to agree with that, would rather see JB in a guest drive at Lydden than driving that old nail around the principality....
My fave were the 2 comments "Have you been mis-sold PPI?" and "Have you had a motor vehicle accident in the last 5 years that wasn't your fault? :-)

Mr Tidy

22,421 posts

128 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
768 said:
Really hope we get to see JB back even if he just drifts it round at the back and parks it in a wall.

Quite something that they've let Alonso do this, won't it affect the battle for the championship? wink
Well it might if Fernando managed to finish a race, but that isn't looking likely just now is it?

jamiebae

6,245 posts

212 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
suffolk009 said:
Brilliant idea, all around.

And all the people posting about how Alonso has stuffed it to McLaren/got them over a barrel - have you actually read the McLaren press release? He is driving an Andretti-Honda. It will be branded a McLaren for the race. This is a McLaren and Honda plan. I suspect this is Zak Brown and the McLaren/Honda team thinking about McLaren's motorsport future beyond just F1.

As for who will drive at Monaco, I'd be amazed if it wasn't JB.
I don't believe the press release is an accurate representation of the facts. If McLaren want to get a good result at Indy then there are better drivers to do it with, putting Fernando in it is a gamble - he could be great but he might not have the last 10th of speed and come home in 24th place. If they want a big PR coup then I'm sure Jenson could have been talked into driving the car and would have generated at least as many column inches. However, they are going to miss their superstar driver at the track where their power deficit is least painful, and the track where arguably the driver can make the biggest difference.

Also, Honda's F1 programme is run out of Japan, and Indy is in the USA with different management so I very much doubt Honda have anything at all to do with this. Fernando is hardly a celebrity in the USA either.


Vaud

50,607 posts

156 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
jamiebae said:
I don't believe the press release is an accurate representation of the facts. If McLaren want to get a good result at Indy then there are better drivers to do it with, putting Fernando in it is a gamble - he could be great but he might not have the last 10th of speed and come home in 24th place. If they want a big PR coup then I'm sure Jenson could have been talked into driving the car and would have generated at least as many column inches. However, they are going to miss their superstar driver at the track where their power deficit is least painful, and the track where arguably the driver can make the biggest difference.

Also, Honda's F1 programme is run out of Japan, and Indy is in the USA with different management so I very much doubt Honda have anything at all to do with this. Fernando is hardly a celebrity in the USA either.
I think that's the most cynical post I've read in a while and I've been through a lot on this site. wink

jamiebae

6,245 posts

212 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
Vaud said:
jamiebae said:
I don't believe the press release is an accurate representation of the facts. If McLaren want to get a good result at Indy then there are better drivers to do it with, putting Fernando in it is a gamble - he could be great but he might not have the last 10th of speed and come home in 24th place. If they want a big PR coup then I'm sure Jenson could have been talked into driving the car and would have generated at least as many column inches. However, they are going to miss their superstar driver at the track where their power deficit is least painful, and the track where arguably the driver can make the biggest difference.

Also, Honda's F1 programme is run out of Japan, and Indy is in the USA with different management so I very much doubt Honda have anything at all to do with this. Fernando is hardly a celebrity in the USA either.
I think that's the most cynical post I've read in a while and I've been through a lot on this site. wink
hehe

I have a small amount of experience of motorsport marketing and how it all works, and to me this just doesn't add up. I suspect it may have been Zak's idea to do Indy, but only because he needed to find something to stop Fernando walking out and joining Porsche to do LMP1 or similar.

Alonso isn't as money-motivated as some so he would have been a higher risk of walking away from his contract than most - he moved back to Spain from Monaco a few years ago in spite of the fact it knocks 25-50% of his take-home pay in tax, and if an interesting drive was available with no sign of improvement from Honda then I'm sure he'd be off like a shot.

Vaud

50,607 posts

156 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
jamiebae said:
hehe

I have a small amount of experience of motorsport marketing and how it all works, and to me this just doesn't add up. I suspect it may have been Zak's idea to do Indy, but only because he needed to find something to stop Fernando walking out and joining Porsche to do LMP1 or similar.

Alonso isn't as money-motivated as some so he would have been a higher risk of walking away from his contract than most - he moved back to Spain from Monaco a few years ago in spite of the fact it knocks 25-50% of his take-home pay in tax, and if an interesting drive was available with no sign of improvement from Honda then I'm sure he'd be off like a shot.
I agree it is an odd move, but apparently (Autosport) the idea was from Fernando on the back of a casual conversation (around doing the triple) and then got rapidly accelerated and agreed in 2 days.

From a PR buildup to the 500, I don't see the downside.

> 2x F1 WDC Alonso struggles, US press go mad that their loopy drivers are the best
> 2x F1 WDC Alonso does well, US press go mad that F1 rockstar is in town, more F1 drivers needed

Would be good to see F1 work to reschedule Monaco or the 500 to allow more drivers to make guest races.

VladD

7,859 posts

266 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
Vaud said:
I agree it is an odd move, but apparently (Autosport) the idea was from Fernando on the back of a casual conversation (around doing the triple) and then got rapidly accelerated and agreed in 2 days.

From a PR buildup to the 500, I don't see the downside.

> 2x F1 WDC Alonso struggles, US press go mad that their loopy drivers are the best
> 2x F1 WDC Alonso does well, US press go mad that F1 rockstar is in town, more F1 drivers needed

Would be good to see F1 work to reschedule Monaco or the 500 to allow more drivers to make guest races.
And with the struggles that McLaren are having in F1, a decent result for a McLaren (liveried car) at Indy wouldn't do sales and marketing in the US any harm.

paua

5,762 posts

144 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
McLaren have previous form at Indy - Indianapolis 500 wins in McLaren cars for Mark Donohue in 1972 and Johnny Rutherford in 1974 and 1976.
Don't remember details off-hand, but I think '76 involved record speed/time?

aeropilot

34,671 posts

228 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
VladD said:
Vaud said:
I agree it is an odd move, but apparently (Autosport) the idea was from Fernando on the back of a casual conversation (around doing the triple) and then got rapidly accelerated and agreed in 2 days.

From a PR buildup to the 500, I don't see the downside.

> 2x F1 WDC Alonso struggles, US press go mad that their loopy drivers are the best
> 2x F1 WDC Alonso does well, US press go mad that F1 rockstar is in town, more F1 drivers needed

Would be good to see F1 work to reschedule Monaco or the 500 to allow more drivers to make guest races.
And with the struggles that McLaren are having in F1, a decent result for a McLaren (liveried car) at Indy wouldn't do sales and marketing in the US any harm.
Yep.

And to the person who thinks Fred doesn't have a big profile in the USA, I spend time and a couple of very USA based forums and this is BIG news, and seen as a bit of a coup for Indy racing, and my ex-pat mate who lives in California has also said this is a big talking point in past few days. Don't forget the huge percentage of Spanish speaking population in the USA.
I'm hardly a Fred fan, but I've got a lot of respect for the guy wanting to prove himself in an area beyond F1...hope he does well.


rubystone

11,254 posts

260 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
I think the best PR coup would be for McLaren to put Montoya in the car for Monaco. Great for Liberty and for raising F1's profile in the US. I'm sure the issue of a Superlicence coull be navigated around.

This is smart thinking by Brown. They want to keep Alonso for 2019 and beyond; by allowing him more freedom at a time when they don't have a winning car is no big issue for them. And no doubt in return for this concession, Alonso's mood ought to improve and Brown might have been able to extract a commitment from Alonso form a contractual perspective. Although there's no doubt Alonso will not lock himself into anything until the music stops in trh contractual merry-go-round at the end of this year.

Vaud

50,607 posts

156 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
I haven't watched Indy for 15+ years, but I will this year...

London424

12,829 posts

176 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
rubystone said:
I think the best PR coup would be for McLaren to put Montoya in the car for Monaco. Great for Liberty and for raising F1's profile in the US. I'm sure the issue of a Superlicence coull be navigated around.
He wouldn't even fit in the car!

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
London424 said:
rubystone said:
I think the best PR coup would be for McLaren to put Montoya in the car for Monaco. Great for Liberty and for raising F1's profile in the US. I'm sure the issue of a Superlicence coull be navigated around.
He wouldn't even fit in the car!
He probably can't be flown over due to the requirement for an An-225 to come and collect him. A sea crossing takes 6 days.

aeropilot

34,671 posts

228 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
London424 said:
rubystone said:
I think the best PR coup would be for McLaren to put Montoya in the car for Monaco. Great for Liberty and for raising F1's profile in the US. I'm sure the issue of a Superlicence coull be navigated around.
He wouldn't even fit in the car!
He probably can't be flown over due to the requirement for an An-225 to come and collect him. A sea crossing takes 6 days.
hehe

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
London424 said:
rubystone said:
I think the best PR coup would be for McLaren to put Montoya in the car for Monaco. Great for Liberty and for raising F1's profile in the US. I'm sure the issue of a Superlicence coull be navigated around.
He wouldn't even fit in the car!
/Alternative joke

Do Absolute Taste even do hamburgers?

CoolHands

18,691 posts

196 months

Thursday 13th April 2017
quotequote all
So is it on telly or what?