The Official 2017 Azerbaijan Grand Prix Thread **Spoilers**

The Official 2017 Azerbaijan Grand Prix Thread **Spoilers**

Author
Discussion

robbom3

264 posts

228 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
I think the biggest issue here is Vettel's complete refusal to admit he's in the wrong. Not the first time either. Who remember's when he collided with Mark Webber and then stood at the side of the track shaking his fist at him. In car footage clearly showed the he changed line (just like yesterday), and yet somehow it was all Webber's fault. Whilst the collision(s) were at low speed yesterday, it was still dangerous, and he should have been DQ'ed. Wonder what would have happened if he'd broken Lewis's suspension ??? I pretty much guarantee they'd have DQ'ed him then. He's a disgrace, and needs bringing to heel before one of his petulant episodes results in a nasty crash.

Munter

31,319 posts

242 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
I think if he had damaged hamiltons car and affected his race Vetel would have been disqualified <snip>
Do we know that the shove up the back didn't damage the back of Hamilton's "headrest"?

Enricogto

646 posts

146 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
robbom3 said:
I think the biggest issue here is Vettel's complete refusal to admit he's in the wrong. Not the first time either. Who remember's when he collided with Mark Webber and then stood at the side of the track shaking his fist at him. In car footage clearly showed the he changed line (just like yesterday), and yet somehow it was all Webber's fault. Whilst the collision(s) were at low speed yesterday, it was still dangerous, and he should have been DQ'ed. Wonder what would have happened if he'd broken Lewis's suspension ??? I pretty much guarantee they'd have DQ'ed him then. He's a disgrace, and needs bringing to heel before one of his petulant episodes results in a nasty crash.
This and many other similar posts in this thread show the difference between a racer and fans commentating from the sofa.
Don't get me wrong, Vettel was wrong in what he did.
However, what we saw yesterday was another demonstration of the old saying "You're not anymore a racing driver if when you see a gap you don't go for it". After the restart Vettel knew he had to stay as close as possible to the back of Hamilton's car if he wanted a chance to attack on the next straight. Hamilton was at the front and had the right to dictate the pace, however he should have accelerated a bit out of the corner, knowing that he had about 15 cars behind him accelerating and swerving before the corner and out of it in order to maintain the tire temp. Again, this is not an excuse for Vettel. But the moment he had backed of an maintained a 3-4 car length distance between them, he would have relinquished any chance of attack, and he wouldn't have been a race car driver anymore. And this is valid for any form of sport, be it karting, BTCC, F1....hell, even bike racing!

anonymous-user

55 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Forgive me as I've been a bit busy since the race, but is there a chance that the move was not deliberate? From the onboard I have seen he was gesticulating wildly so is there a chance it was accidental in that he caught the wheel with his hand has he put it in or pulled it out of the cockpit? Maybe this and the slow speed is why the punishment was more lenient than might have been expected.

The telemetry shows Hamilton did not unduly slow or alter the pressure on the brake pedal so the stewards know there was no brake test, but I think the other factors maybe why the punishment is seen to befit the crime by them.

TheLimla

1,829 posts

195 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Munter said:
BoRED S2upid said:
I think if he had damaged hamiltons car and affected his race Vetel would have been disqualified <snip>
Do we know that the shove up the back didn't damage the back of Hamilton's "headrest"?
I doubt we'd find out if this was the case unless Mercedes analyse the headrest and find damage but most likely it wasn't fitted properly. Thats my guess, bloody unfortunate for HAM though. Sometimes he has no luck what so ever!

Doink

1,652 posts

148 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Munter said:
BoRED S2upid said:
I think if he had damaged hamiltons car and affected his race Vetel would have been disqualified <snip>
Do we know that the shove up the back didn't damage the back of Hamilton's "headrest"?
According to Toto there was significant damage to his diffuser, anyone notice that he was never really close enough to complete the overtake at the end of the straight, some laps he'd even dropped out of DRS yet before the incident he always pulled away after the SC, his car was defo damaged and lost a bit of aero performance

VladD

7,860 posts

266 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Enricogto said:
This and many other similar posts in this thread show the difference between a racer and fans commentating from the sofa.
Don't get me wrong, Vettel was wrong in what he did.
However, what we saw yesterday was another demonstration of the old saying "You're not anymore a racing driver if when you see a gap you don't go for it". After the restart Vettel knew he had to stay as close as possible to the back of Hamilton's car if he wanted a chance to attack on the next straight. Hamilton was at the front and had the right to dictate the pace, however he should have accelerated a bit out of the corner, knowing that he had about 15 cars behind him accelerating and swerving before the corner and out of it in order to maintain the tire temp. Again, this is not an excuse for Vettel. But the moment he had backed of an maintained a 3-4 car length distance between them, he would have relinquished any chance of attack, and he wouldn't have been a race car driver anymore. And this is valid for any form of sport, be it karting, BTCC, F1....hell, even bike racing!
No. "You're not anymore a racing driver if when you see a gap you don't go for it" was a quote from Senna. He was a great driver, but also hot headed and prone to doing stupid stuff. That was a stupid quote he used to try and justify why he had so many accidents.

Why should Hamilton have accelerated, because you think he should have? Vettel made an assumption that Lewis would floor it and he got it wrong. It really is that simple.


Edited by VladD on Monday 26th June 10:28

swisstoni

17,045 posts

280 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Munter said:
BoRED S2upid said:
I think if he had damaged hamiltons car and affected his race Vetel would have been disqualified <snip>
Do we know that the shove up the back didn't damage the back of Hamilton's "headrest"?
It clearly damaged his car, whether it affected the headrest or not.
It was being patched up during the Red Flag period. (Under close scrutiny from Ferrari 'observers' I noticed).
Hamilton seemed to lack ultimate pace after that, to me.




Europa1

10,923 posts

189 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
HARTLEYHARE1 said:
If I did rate Lewis as uk citizen and reasonable driver who actually cares about his home country and its people I'm sure I would feel some degree of agreement with today's incident but as Lewis is neither a nice guy , a uk citizen when it suits and only winning due to another great F1 driver building the Mercedes team before his arrival then I'm buying vettel his first beer for making his day

Everyone get over it
Would that be the same "another great F1 driver" who calls Switzerland home?

ukaskew

10,642 posts

222 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Enricogto said:
This and many other similar posts in this thread show the difference between a racer and fans commentating from the sofa...However, what we saw yesterday was another demonstration of the old saying "You're not anymore a racing driver if when you see a gap you don't go for it".
For that incident fair enough, I don't think anyone has an issue with the 10 second penalty for that. Careless but a genuine accident, it was in neither drivers interest for that to happen.

The issue, and you don't need to be a racer to comment on this, was him intentionally driving up alongside Hamilton and then driving into him. A serious case of red mist (and not the first time from Vettel, it has to be said) of the likes that you simply shouldn't see in safety conscious F1 these days. The fact that it essentially went unpunished is a very bizarre message to be coming out of F1.

That second incident, and that alone in isolation from the first one, is what they should have thrown the book at him for.

kambites

67,593 posts

222 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
The really daft thing about Vettel's complaints about being "brake tested" are that according to the stewards, Hamilton's inputs were exactly the same as on the other SC restarts so Vettel had already seen him do exactly the same thing before.

Mark A S

1,838 posts

189 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Well, that was an entertaining race, made good TV IMO.

Well done to Daniel and young Stroll, nothing like a good result to boost confidence. Also, excellent comeback by Bottas.

Someone bumping another up the arse under safety car had to happen sometime, it’s been very close several times before. I understand Vettel’s anger in thinking he had been brake tested whether true or not and also driving alongside gesticulating.
The contact though was bloody stupid, he must feel a right tit today.

Adrian W

13,893 posts

229 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
ukaskew said:
Indeed, especially as the actual reason for Vettel's 10 second penalty was 'potentially dangerous' driving.

I'd love to know what constitutes actual honest-to-goodness dangerous driving.
For a start why bother racing your opponent, just crash into him on the warm up, cant be considered dangerous now, we have a ruling

Vaud

Original Poster:

50,614 posts

156 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Adrian W said:
ukaskew said:
Indeed, especially as the actual reason for Vettel's 10 second penalty was 'potentially dangerous' driving.

I'd love to know what constitutes actual honest-to-goodness dangerous driving.
For a start why bother racing your opponent, just crash into him on the warm up, cant be considered dangerous now, we have a ruling
As I understand it they focus more on the outcome of the action than the action itself.

GuitarTech

582 posts

151 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Breaking news: It's all over the internet that Lewis has suggested that he and Vettel sort their differences out with a man-on-man confrontation. Fisticuffs behind the pitlane, it's hammertime Lewis laugh
You couldn't make it up, the media always tell the truth, don't they?....Oh, wait....

SeeFive

8,280 posts

234 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
kambites said:
The really daft thing about Vettel's complaints about being "brake tested" are that according to the stewards, Hamilton's inputs were exactly the same as on the other SC restarts so Vettel had already seen him do exactly the same thing before.
At the point where Seb had just got out of the car, he may have been erroneously under the impression that Lewis had brake tested him. Those interviews were conducted while he still had that impression.

It will be interesting to hear him interviewed now he has seen as much as we have seen from the telemetry and officials.

Munter

31,319 posts

242 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
GuitarTech said:
Breaking news: It's all over the internet that Lewis has suggested that he and Vettel sort their differences out with a man-on-man confrontation. Fisticuffs behind the pitlane, it's hammertime Lewis laugh
You couldn't make it up, the media always tell the truth, don't they?....Oh, wait....
He said it on the Live C4 coverage.

VladD

7,860 posts

266 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
SeeFive said:
At the point where Seb had just got out of the car, he may have been erroneously under the impression that Lewis had brake tested him. Those interviews were conducted while he still had that impression.

It will be interesting to hear him interviewed now he has seen as much as we have seen from the telemetry and officials.
Indeed. His conduct from this point onward will be interesting. I expect Ferrari PR will be having a word with him too.

Adrian W

13,893 posts

229 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Munter said:
GuitarTech said:
Breaking news: It's all over the internet that Lewis has suggested that he and Vettel sort their differences out with a man-on-man confrontation. Fisticuffs behind the pitlane, it's hammertime Lewis laugh
You couldn't make it up, the media always tell the truth, don't they?....Oh, wait....
He said it on the Live C4 coverage.
isn't Hamilton a 300th Dan black belt in origami or something?

GuitarTech

582 posts

151 months

Monday 26th June 2017
quotequote all
Munter said:
GuitarTech said:
Breaking news: It's all over the internet that Lewis has suggested that he and Vettel sort their differences out with a man-on-man confrontation. Fisticuffs behind the pitlane, it's hammertime Lewis laugh
You couldn't make it up, the media always tell the truth, don't they?....Oh, wait....
He said it on the Live C4 coverage.
Ah,Ok. I'm in Germany, we don't get C4 here. I watched it on Sky yesterday.