The Official 2018 F1 Silly Season *Contains Speculation*

The Official 2018 F1 Silly Season *Contains Speculation*

Author
Discussion

HustleRussell

24,733 posts

161 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
ELUSIVEJIM said:
Williams need two drivers IMO.

Get rid of Stroll and Massa but Williams are a sell out and will take money over talent which is a real shame.

Williams should be looking at the following

Charles Leclerc "very much doubt Williams would get him" frown

Robert Kubica would be way ahead of any other driver available even with his disability.

Wehrlein is a talent and could be available considering the engine in the rear of the Williams.
If you were watching the sport rather than commenting on it blindly you’d know that losing Stroll, were it legally possible, would cost Williams several tens of millions (much of which is probably already spent), jeopardising the company- and for what? To get rid of a driver who at the age of 18 and in his debut year is already moderately capable, has already had a standout performance at Monza (and arguably Baku) and is improving continuously.

Leclerc will go wherever Ferrari wants him to, and that is likely to be Sauber

Wehrlein basically is available for that reason.

Vaud

Original Poster:

50,617 posts

156 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
Leclerc will go wherever Ferrari wants him to, and that is likely to be Sauber
Which is the right move I think. Sauber are at the back of the grid, so expectations can be low. OK, a better engine next year and they seem to be building up the team.

So he can develop a full year of experience without the pressure of dropping into a top line team and all that entails. If he picks up some points then all the better.

Tripe Bypass

583 posts

204 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
I've read somewhere this morning that the Williams drive is between Massa and Kubica. DiResta is at the tests as a yardstick and has only an outside chance, I.e. he would only get the drive if Massa chose to retire and Kubica didn't do the onions at the test.

StevieBee

12,933 posts

256 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
My feeling is that if Kubica was up for it and capable, Renault would have had him signed up by now. That they haven't tells you all you need to know - sadly.

Bacardi Ltd are looking to boost market share for the Martini brand in the UK and this may well play into PDR's hands, helped too by the profile he's maintained out of the car via Sky Sports.

In an ideal world, there's any number of drivers that would serve Williams better in terms of on-track performance but F1 has never operated in an ideal world.

Vaud

Original Poster:

50,617 posts

156 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
My feeling is that if Kubica was up for it and capable, Renault would have had him signed up by now.
More complex than that given the whole Sainz loan, etc?

Dr Z

3,396 posts

172 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
Vaud said:
Button. Meh. Probably heresy on a predominantly UK forum. Ditto when people say anything about Hill.

Button was in the right place and right time, and a very nice guy, but it was a huge chunk of luck. Even Ross commented that he was a bit flaky at times and he had him in 2009 as Button/Barrichello had nowhere else to go, but nor did Ross have any choice.

I think it is telling that Mercedes didn't retain him; they had the financial ability to do so.
Blimey, if you're not allowed to be a bit flaky when you're fighting for your first Championship, I don't know what. Tough crowd.

I think you will find that Button considered the team to be seriously depleted by the end of 2009 and will take several years of rebuilding before they could be competitive. Didn't fancy going through that again and moved to McLaren.

Glad Kubica has a shot for the Williams seat.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
HustleRussell said:
If you were watching the sport rather than commenting on it blindly you’d know that losing Stroll, were it legally possible, would cost Williams several tens of millions (much of which is probably already spent), jeopardising the company- and for what? To get rid of a driver who at the age of 18 and in his debut year is already moderately capable, has already had a standout performance at Monza (and arguably Baku) and is improving continuously.

Leclerc will go wherever Ferrari wants him to, and that is likely to be Sauber

Wehrlein basically is available for that reason.
I know it is not possible for Williams to get rid of Stroll but that is their mistake.

Yes he is only 18 years of age but he is not on a F1 level.

C Lee Farquar

4,069 posts

217 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
Vaud said:
Isn't it down to some of their key markets - that don't allow <25 year olds in alcohol advertising?
Have Williams ever confirmed it's in the contract, do we know?

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
ELUSIVEJIM said:
I know it is not possible for Williams to get rid of Stroll but that is their mistake.

Yes he is only 18 years of age but he is not on a F1 level.
He has had more podiums than most drivers on the grid this year.

he has a lot to learn, but he is doing OK for an 18 year old kid, if Williams gain some financial stability whilst having the potential for a decent mid field team driver, what's not to like? They can use the other seat to try a more established driver.

thegreenhell

15,425 posts

220 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
ELUSIVEJIM said:
I know it is not possible for Williams to get rid of Stroll but that is their mistake.

Yes he is only 18 years of age but he is not on a F1 level.
Really? Anyone who actually watches the sport will be able to tell you that he's beaten Massa in each of the last three GP, on merit, and is only one point behind him in the standings. I think the team are actually very happy with him, and not just for the money.

Vaud

Original Poster:

50,617 posts

156 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
Really? Anyone who actually watches the sport will be able to tell you that he's beaten Massa in each of the last three GP, on merit, and is only one point behind him in the standings. I think the team are actually very happy with him, and not just for the money.
He is maturing well. Maybe not the next Schumacher but seems pretty solid at the moment, given the very variable Williams he has to drive.

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
DanielSan said:
How old is Andre Lotterer?
36 in November.

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
Vaud said:
...given the very variable Williams he has to drive.
It's not all that variable at heart, it's just a compromised concept towards lower drag and consequently lower fuel consumption and starting weight. That's why it has problems getting tyre temperature consistently. The Williams has been like this for several seasons.

The change over to a higher-downforce concept is going to cost them a fortune they don't currently have.

DanielSan

18,818 posts

168 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
Vaud said:
He is maturing well. Maybe not the next Schumacher but seems pretty solid at the moment, given the very variable Williams he has to drive.
I know everyone likes to knock Stroll but you're right. Since Baku he's gained confidence and isn't doing a bad job, he's doing about as well as anyone could do in that car in the races. Qualifying pace is where he needs to up his game, it's like he can't quite get to the limit of his or the cars speed yet over one lap. Once that comes and he gets that last bit of confidence combined with experience and that last bit of ability he has potential to be a quality driver. He's not the be Hamilton or Vettel but I don't think he'd be any worse than Perez/Hulk/Grosjesn etc

DanielSan

18,818 posts

168 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
36 in November.
I didn't think he was that old to be honest, I thought more like 30-32. That may well answer why he isn't on the potentials list then.

Vaud

Original Poster:

50,617 posts

156 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
DanielSan said:
I know everyone likes to knock Stroll but you're right. Since Baku he's gained confidence and isn't doing a bad job, he's doing about as well as anyone could do in that car in the races. Qualifying pace is where he needs to up his game, it's like he can't quite get to the limit of his or the cars speed yet over one lap. Once that comes and he gets that last bit of confidence combined with experience and that last bit of ability he has potential to be a quality driver. He's not the be Hamilton or Vettel but I don't think he'd be any worse than Perez/Hulk/Grosjesn etc
I agree. I think it's a useful relationship for Williams and for Stroll.

CraigyMc

16,423 posts

237 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
DanielSan said:
CraigyMc said:
36 in November.
I didn't think he was that old to be honest, I thought more like 30-32. That may well answer why he isn't on the potentials list then.
Hulkenberg and Vettel are 30. Hammo is the 4th oldest driver on the grid, at 32.

Alonso and Massa are both 36, and Kimi's 37 - these guys form the old guard.

carl_w

9,196 posts

259 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
Hulkenberg and Vettel are 30. Hammo is the 4th oldest driver on the grid, at 32.

Alonso and Massa are both 36, and Kimi's 37 - these guys form the old guard.
Blimey. It's a bit of a perfect storm but Fred->Indycar, Kimi dropped by Ferrari and Massa retiring makes Hammo the oldest on the grid.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
Hulkenberg and Vettel are 30. Hammo is the 4th oldest driver on the grid, at 32.

Alonso and Massa are both 36, and Kimi's 37 - these guys form the old guard.
Damon Hill was 31 when he first sat in an F1 car and 32 when he first drove for Williams.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 4th October 2017
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
Really? Anyone who actually watches the sport will be able to tell you that he's beaten Massa in each of the last three GP, on merit, and is only one point behind him in the standings. I think the team are actually very happy with him, and not just for the money.
Massa has had two retirements and a withdraw due to illness. Stroll has had three retirements so both on level terms.

Throughout the rest of the season when both drivers have finished the races it is 6-3 to Massa.

Stroll is only close to Massa this season points wise due to his fortunate 3rd place at the Azerbaijan GP.

He has only proven that money gets you into F1.