F1 Start timer

[rgw2012]

Best time but tend to average about 0.19 - 0.23

(Quality result when anticipating though :-) )

[JacksonRacing223]

Probably easier on mobile, and luck but can't be believe i got this time

Edited by JacksonRacing223 on Thursday 13th July 18:53

[Doink]

So slow!

https://youtu.be/6fgGJ-M6X2s

[Isaac Bevin]

It's called: Anticipation :P

[TheDeuce]

I'm consistently around 0.2 which I'm happy enough with - it's about the same as when I ran at santa pod 18 years ago! Not aged too badly then

Interestingly, I found my thumb moving a few mm to tap the screen was more likely to jump start than my left foot used to be at moving several inches to dump the clutch. Shaky hands from too much wine these days perhaps

[Debaser]

Most of mine were close to 0.2, though I did get this as my fastest.

[ItsThePanther]

This is miy record of https://f1-start.glitch.me/ is the best in the world

[ItsThePanther]

LLCool_K said:

Just had a missed call on my mobile from a number with a Woking dialling code. Odd.

Edited by LLCool_K on Tuesday 11th July 12:04

[PhilAsia]

0.313 seconds

With a few British "after-you's..."

[toerag]

ItsThePanther said:

This is miy record of https://f1-start.glitch.me/ is the best in the world

[Sandpit Steve]

Glad to see everyone practicing their anticipation skills!

In track and field athletics, they have sensors in the starting blocks and the allowed reaction time is 0.100s. If you get 0.099 you’re getting disqualified for a false start, as no human can react that quickly to the (audio) start signal. And yes, they’ve done extensive testing on athletes, and couldn’t find a 100m runner who came close to 0.1s without anticipating the signal. 0.2 is more usual.

[rdjohn]

I suspect that releasing the clutch might also be a bit harder than tapping a screen.

Last time out it was interesting how introducing the 0.2 second rule to pit-stops introduced a few errors as well as time.

[Maheep Nahata]

Hi

[Maheep Nahata]

Check the best record of mine

[Castellet]

It’s a bit of fun, but not realistic.
And, anyone can attempt it multiple times until they get a good result.
In a race, you get one chance and, if you do over-anticipate, the penalties can be harsh.

[NIRMIT66]

According to google I have made a record , my best was 0.014

This is the proof.

[gt_12345]

ukaskew said:

Device may make a difference. Clicking a mouse is going to take longer than tapping a screen with your finger hovering a mm above it.

100%

Touch would be much easier

[PhilAsia]

gt_12345 said:

ukaskew said:

Device may make a difference. Clicking a mouse is going to take longer than tapping a screen with your finger hovering a mm above it.

100%

Touch would be much easier

My 0.313secs was running from the opposite side of the room and finding the mouse on a cluttered desk...

[Jasandjules]

0.141 so far.

[Purav]

I have 0.100 of record continuously 14 times .