New engine regs for 2021

New engine regs for 2021

Author
Discussion

Doink

Original Poster:

1,652 posts

147 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
So today's the day then when they announce to all that care what the new engine will be.

My guess is 2 litre V6 twin turbo, no heat recovery for extra flamage, simple spec KERS, with increased fuel flow limit

MikeyC

836 posts

227 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
Doink said:
My guess is 2 litre V6 twin turbo, no heat recovery for extra flamage, simple spec KERS, with increased fuel flow limit
Was thinking the same thing!
Does it actually have to be a V6 tho' ?
just thinking it might encourage other manufacturers to enter in the future (VAG ?)

stevesingo

4,855 posts

222 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
Minimises the change in architecture for chassis integration.

Mikeeb

406 posts

118 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
Increased rev limit too.

Dr Z

3,396 posts

171 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
Rev limit same as now but fuel flow limits in the rev range massaged a bit.

+1 on the loss of heat recovery motor.

Going to be some weedy little engines compared to now. I think the loss of the heat recovery will hugely reduce the power levels seen. But manufacturers can work on refining the combustion tech, but the question would be, do manufacturers have a big desire to push ICE tech when they cannot justify it with Road relevance?

With a budget cap, they could perhaps justify F1 as a pure brand exposure/marketing thing.

Megaflow

9,410 posts

225 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
They will stick with a 1.6l V6. The cost of moving away from that architecture and redeveloping the combustion system will be immense.

I'd like to to see the thermal recovery deleted, two turbochargers and a fuel flow limit that matches the rev limit.

bigbadbikercats

634 posts

208 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
How about taking a couple of gear ratios away as a way of getting the engines running higher up the rev range more often?

AllyBassman

779 posts

112 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
Turbo charged inline 4's? :-P

rev-erend

21,415 posts

284 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
3 litre V8

2 hopes.

Some Gump

12,690 posts

186 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
Baggsy 1.5l turbo v12, no fuel restrictions.
If only!

Gad-Westy

14,568 posts

213 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
I think it's time that F1 ditched any pretense about aligning with roadcar trends.

Major manufacturers don't seem that invested in hybrids other than the odd handful. It's mainly small capacity turbo charged petrol engines and rapidly-falling-out-of-fashion turbo charged diesel engines and by the time these regs come in, most manufacturers will be heading very rapidly towards EV's which, for now at least, has no place in F1. So it seems to me like the automotive industry is in a transition period as we pass from IC engines to EV's.

So my thoughts, are fk it and return to V10's and have what might be one last hurrah to big, noisy, inefficient petrol engines. Stick two fingers up to any other agenda and make the cars spectacular again.

That's what I'm dreaming of smile. Being more realistic, I'm sure the reality will be more or less exactly what we have now though I'd at least like to see the whole lot simplified a little.


ajprice

27,477 posts

196 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all

thegreenhell

15,337 posts

219 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
So here it is...

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/formula-1-revea...

The proposal for 2021 includes keeping the current 1.6-litre V6 turbo hybrid engine, but running it at 3000rpm higher "to improve the sound".

In order to try to simplify the internals of the power unit, the MGU-H will be removed, and several prescriptive design parameters will be introduced to "restrict development costs and discourage extreme designs and running conditions".

These will include internal and external parameters, with the latter allowing for what the FIA described as "a plug-and-play engine/chassis/transmission swap capability".

A single turbo with dimensional constraints and weight limits will be mandated, while a standard energy store will be introduced alongside control electronics, which have long been standard in F1.

The MGU-K will be made more powerful, with a focus on manual driver deployment of the additional power, similar to the way KERS was used when it was first introduced into F1 in 2009.

This feature will also give drivers the option to save up energy over several laps to increase the tactical elements involved in racing.


EDIT to add a link the FIA press release - https://www.fia.com/news/fia-and-formula-1-set-out...

Edited by thegreenhell on Tuesday 31st October 14:11

Doink

Original Poster:

1,652 posts

147 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
We already have a 15,000 rev limit but they don't get near that stopping at 12,000 because of the fuel flow limit, so they've added 3k on the rev limit, is that by allowing a higher fuel flow rate to enable 15k to be reached or is it 18k with even higher fuel flow still?

kambites

67,561 posts

221 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
Doink said:
We already have a 15,000 rev limit but they don't get near that stopping at 12,000 because of the fuel flow limit, so they've added 3k on the rev limit, is that by allowing a higher fuel flow rate to enable 15k to be reached or is it 18k with even higher fuel flow still?
My guess would be that the constraints on the turbo will reduce the viable boost pressure which will make it necessary to raise the revs higher to use the current fuel flow.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
kambites said:
Doink said:
We already have a 15,000 rev limit but they don't get near that stopping at 12,000 because of the fuel flow limit, so they've added 3k on the rev limit, is that by allowing a higher fuel flow rate to enable 15k to be reached or is it 18k with even higher fuel flow still?
My guess would be that the constraints on the turbo will reduce the viable boost pressure which will make it necessary to raise the revs higher to use the current fuel flow.
The extra RPM comes from Cadence-clutching and careful gearing.

CraigyMc

16,405 posts

236 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
Doink said:
...they don't get near that stopping at 12,000...
You're talking bks.

rdjohn

6,179 posts

195 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
No mention of target customer costs. I would have thought that should have been high on Ross’s wish list.

suffolk009

5,393 posts

165 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
I don't understand how the idea of saving up to three laps worth of electrical energy will work. Surely that would require a battery pack three times the size and weight of an energy store/battery for maximising one single lap.


thegreenhell

15,337 posts

219 months

Tuesday 31st October 2017
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
Doink said:
...they don't get near that stopping at 12,000...
You're talking bks.
TBF that's not exactly representative. He's obviously in a DRS tow on a long straight in top gear, hence revving beyond the usual range. They usually upshift between 11 and 12k revs. They never get close to the current 15k rpm limit.