The Official Australian Grand Prix Thread ***SPOILERS***

The Official Australian Grand Prix Thread ***SPOILERS***

Author
Discussion

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

152 months

Wednesday 28th March 2018
quotequote all
Car-Matt said:
A couple of armchair experts on a car forum aren't going to suddenly find a gaping hole in the rules of one of the most lucrative sports in the world..........
Ah, but it happened to Lewis.....that means its an appalling travesty and blame must be laid...preferably away from Hamilton smile

In all seriousness, this needs to be chalked up to the law of unintended consequences, and maybe Mercedes need to take a lesson in not trying to be too clever for their own good!

rdjohn

6,180 posts

195 months

Wednesday 28th March 2018
quotequote all
It was the intention of Pirelli’s tyre compounds this year, to ensure that each race needed two pitstops. Again, they got it wrong as teams will always prefer to try a one-stop and that crystallises these unintended consequences.

I just wish they would stop messing about and write a rule that requires two stops. Strategies would come to life, particularly in races like Oz where 5-passes have become the norm. And then situations like Lewis / Seb have the potential to be unwound.

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 28th March 2018
quotequote all
Car-Matt said:
The zones are the marshalling zones, they are small as each marshal can see the next marshal along so there is always a line of sight around the whole circuit. Not sure on the speed but they have to stick to a time through each sector
The marshalling zone is the section of track between each of the FIA light panels, they have track sensors at each light panel point to produce the timing data for the FIA feed. You can have multiple manned flag marshalls inside a single light panel marshalling zone. The only points that are used are the light panel positions, plus the safety car lines at the entrance and exit of the pits.

The speed is set by the FIA in the standard ECU and could be varied event to event, they all have that producing the delta time on the dash, its not something the teams can program.

DanielSan

18,794 posts

167 months

Wednesday 28th March 2018
quotequote all
Vocal Minority said:
Car-Matt said:
A couple of armchair experts on a car forum aren't going to suddenly find a gaping hole in the rules of one of the most lucrative sports in the world..........
Ah, but it happened to Lewis.....that means its an appalling travesty and blame must be laid...preferably away from Hamilton smile

In all seriousness, this needs to be chalked up to the law of unintended consequences, and maybe Mercedes need to take a lesson in not trying to be too clever for their own good!
This.

Why is it if there’d been a normal safety car Ferrari’s tactics would be seen as great tactics and nothing more yet under the VSC the tactics are arguably even better and yet a lot of fans can’t wrap their head around this fact?

They’re allowed to pit for new tyres whether the safety car is a silver Merc going as fast as it can or if it’s a virtual one. There is no argument about whether it’s fair or not, the only argument to have is whether Merc fked up more than Ferrari didn’t fk up.

Dr Z

Original Poster:

3,396 posts

171 months

Wednesday 28th March 2018
quotequote all
I think Merc were trying to be a bit too clever in the 1st stint, and I'd say that rather than the VSC cockup cost them the win. Lewis was setting a slow pace early on, to keep the midfield pack close by to prevent an early undercut attempt by Ferrari.

He spent like 10 laps in the 1m29s, leading by 3 seconds after 15 laps. rolleyes

Pretty sure that Merc could have gone a lot faster, judging by how much speed they were able to find when they suddenly found themselves behind the red car.

Again in the second stint, the same games.

Maybe Merc were too concerned about absolutely dominating the first race after absolutely dominating the first qualifying.

We don't want people to start panicking, do we? wink

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 28th March 2018
quotequote all
They wont push the speed more than they have to, that's what happens when you have the F1 races being part of a 7 race endurance run. (utter garbage call off the pursuit racing as a result)

Mercedes covered off Kimi's pit stop, had they not then under the vast majority of cases Kimi would have won.

Vettel got lucky with the VSC, there was no strategy involved other than making sure Vetell didn't come out behind a Haas, without the Haas team imploding he would have been 3rd.

Car-Matt

1,923 posts

138 months

Wednesday 28th March 2018
quotequote all
jsf said:
They wont push the speed more than they have to, that's what happens when you have the F1 races being part of a 7 race endurance run. (utter garbage call off the pursuit racing as a result)

Mercedes covered off Kimi's pit stop, had they not then under the vast majority of cases Kimi would have won.

Vettel got lucky with the VSC, there was no strategy involved other than making sure Vetell didn't come out behind a Haas, without the Haas team imploding he would have been 3rd.
We agree on something, Vettel got very lucky and imo Ferrari didn’t plan to pit late in case of a safety car

The only things that can really be said was that Merc should have allowed more margin as an immediate real safety car would have seen them lose more time

My suspicion is that the Merc doesn’t have as much of a race pace advantage over Ferrari as we think and it’s extra onelap pace isn’t sustainable over a stint because it probably means they run out of oil and/or grenade the engine

DanielSan

18,794 posts

167 months

Wednesday 28th March 2018
quotequote all
[quote=Car-Mat

My suspicion is that the Merc doesn’t have as much of a race pace advantage over Ferrari as we think and it’s extra onelap pace isn’t sustainable over a stint because it probably means they run out of oil and/or grenade the engine
[/quote]

Pretty much the point we were at last season then which is no bad thing. That Merc one lap pace is just putting Ferrari and McLaren on the back foot sadly.

LDN

8,911 posts

203 months

Wednesday 28th March 2018
quotequote all
Might have been posted before?

Official F1 ‘power rankings’ after the first race...

https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/features/2018/3...

Gad-Westy

14,568 posts

213 months

Thursday 29th March 2018
quotequote all
Dr Z said:
I think Merc were trying to be a bit too clever in the 1st stint, and I'd say that rather than the VSC cockup cost them the win. Lewis was setting a slow pace early on, to keep the midfield pack close by to prevent an early undercut attempt by Ferrari.

He spent like 10 laps in the 1m29s, leading by 3 seconds after 15 laps. rolleyes

Pretty sure that Merc could have gone a lot faster, judging by how much speed they were able to find when they suddenly found themselves behind the red car.

Again in the second stint, the same games.

Maybe Merc were too concerned about absolutely dominating the first race after absolutely dominating the first qualifying.

We don't want people to start panicking, do we? wink
Possibly trying to help Bottas up the field too?

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

228 months

Thursday 29th March 2018
quotequote all
I know it was Australia. But jeez, that was one boring season opener.

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 1st April 2018
quotequote all
When Daniel Ricciardo came to carsales HQ for a visit

Funny interview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Wn6ZxCu2-Y

Edited by anonymous-user on Sunday 1st April 23:05

HTP99

22,553 posts

140 months

Sunday 1st April 2018
quotequote all
ELUSIVEJIM said:
When Daniel Ricciardo came to carsales HQ for a visit

https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/post.asp?h=0&a...
That link is this topics reply box?

anonymous-user

54 months

Sunday 1st April 2018
quotequote all
HTP99 said:
That link is this topics reply box?
PMSL.

Ok changed now.

ZX10R NIN

27,610 posts

125 months

Sunday 1st April 2018
quotequote all
Very funny biglaugh

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 2nd April 2018
quotequote all