F1 Past

Author
Discussion

Deesee

8,461 posts

84 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Who would have known at 10 (ish) years after that photo the theory behind putting something in the air, would then make them stick to the track.

CanAm

9,239 posts

273 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
Chaparral had an adjustable rear wing only 2 years after that photo, in the 1965 USRRC.

Eric Mc

122,063 posts

266 months

Tuesday 18th June 2019
quotequote all
The principle of applying downforce using an inverted aerofoil goes back a long way -

1928



1956



1966



1968


dr_gn

16,169 posts

185 months

Wednesday 19th June 2019
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The principle of applying downforce using an inverted aerofoil goes back a long way -

1928



1956



1966



1968

Not sure what you mean by "inverted aerofoil"? If you mean non-symmetrical aircraft wings turned upside down, then your first example - the OPEL clearly doesn't feature those. They look like normally configured aircraft wing sections, but with a negative angle of attack.

I believe the Chapparal 2E's aerofoil was actually symmetrical (despite many references stating otherwise), but relied on it's driver adjustable angle of attack to give downforce in corners and minimum drag on the straights.

Similarly, I think the earliest versions of winged Lotus 49's (1968) had symmetrical helicopter blade sections, again with their angle of attack adjusted.

Deesee

8,461 posts

84 months

Wednesday 19th June 2019
quotequote all
Here’s a early onboard of Sterling Moss at Brands 1960...

https://youtu.be/54flavqcidI

Eric Mc

122,063 posts

266 months

Wednesday 19th June 2019
quotequote all
dr_gn said:
Not sure what you mean by "inverted aerofoil"? If you mean non-symmetrical aircraft wings turned upside down, then your first example - the OPEL clearly doesn't feature those. They look like normally configured aircraft wing sections, but with a negative angle of attack.

I believe the Chapparal 2E's aerofoil was actually symmetrical (despite many references stating otherwise), but relied on it's driver adjustable angle of attack to give downforce in corners and minimum drag on the straights.

Similarly, I think the earliest versions of winged Lotus 49's (1968) had symmetrical helicopter blade sections, again with their angle of attack adjusted.
I was being a bit simplistic in my description of the devices but whatever they are called - they were designed to generate negative air pressure on the vehicles to improve their grip. The only reason they took so long to become mainstream was fear that the scrutineers and rule makes would ban them outright. Indeed, that is exactly what happened when the May brothers tried their wing out at Le Mans in 1956.

F1 came very close to banning wings in early 1969 after a series of serious accidents caused by wing failures early in that season. Sadly, they chickened out after objections by the teams and they allowed wings to be used as long as they were mounted to the cars rather than directly to their suspensions, they did not exceed specified height limits and could not be adjusted by the driver.

Pericoloso

44,044 posts

164 months

Wednesday 19th June 2019
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
1956

Saw that car ,or similar at last year's Mille Miglia ,couldn't quite believe that it was a period fitting.

That pic seems to prove it .



Eric Mc

122,063 posts

266 months

Wednesday 19th June 2019
quotequote all
Indeed it was - only it wasn't allowed race with the wing fitted. Moss says that the previous year's Mercedes, which had an airbrake fitted, could generate some downforce too - which he found gave good grip out of corners.


CanAm

9,239 posts

273 months

Thursday 20th June 2019
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Sadly, they chickened out after objections by the teams and they allowed wings to be used as long as they .........could not be adjusted by the driver.
And now a computer makes the decision in the interest of "entertainment". frown

coppice

8,626 posts

145 months

Thursday 20th June 2019
quotequote all
Deesee said:
Here’s a early onboard of Sterling Moss at Brands 1960...

https://youtu.be/54flavqcidI
I always thought his near namesake, Stirling Moss , was the more talented ...

Deesee

8,461 posts

84 months

Thursday 20th June 2019
quotequote all
coppice said:
Deesee said:
Here’s a early onboard of Sterling Moss at Brands 1960...

https://youtu.be/54flavqcidI
I always thought his near namesake, Stirling Moss , was the more talented ...
Dammed auro spell on phones eh!

Nice use of punctuation wink



anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
The principle of applying downforce using an inverted aerofoil goes back a long way -

1928



1956



1966



1968

WOW. Not seen some of these before.

Vettel needs the top one to stop Hamilton laugh

Eric Mc

122,063 posts

266 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
If it was beefed up it could replace the halo;)

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
If it was beefed up it could replace the halo;)
Was watching the F1 1986 Brands Hatch race when there was the first lap accident which basically ended Jacques Laffite career with two broken legs.

Many others from his era faired a lot worse but when you see such an accident now it looks completely inconceivable that someone could get hurt. But you can see why he got the injuries. Ouch.

Full race with the crash at the start.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfrgmd60lME&t=...

Eric Mc

122,063 posts

266 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
I remember that. Last ever GP at Brands too - it more or less sealed its fate as a GP venue.

coppice

8,626 posts

145 months

Friday 21st June 2019
quotequote all
The best 3 days I have ever spent at a race circuit . Amazing cars , serious noise and great , great track . Different times but my reaction was hurry up and get Lafitte sorted as we want the cars out again .- he'll be fine , just broken bones . And now we'd virtually be wearing black armbands for broken legs ...

Deesee

8,461 posts

84 months

Monday 24th June 2019
quotequote all
Not F1, but in a car I know well, Sainz Snr, circa 83..

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CuaBHNKycvI

Sound up!

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 27th June 2019
quotequote all
Honda F1 - 1980's Williams, Lotus, McLaren

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPONLgIrHKI

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

55 months

Thursday 27th June 2019
quotequote all
coppice said:
The best 3 days I have ever spent at a race circuit . Amazing cars , serious noise and great , great track . Different times but my reaction was hurry up and get Lafitte sorted as we want the cars out again .- he'll be fine , just broken bones . And now we'd virtually be wearing black armbands for broken legs ...
It's true what you say. Was it Schumacher at Silverstone in 1999 when an F1 driver last broke a leg in a car?


Deesee

8,461 posts

84 months

Thursday 27th June 2019
quotequote all
ELUSIVEJIM said:
Honda F1 - 1980's Williams, Lotus, McLaren

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPONLgIrHKI
Have you ever heard three cars that are actually begging for more...

thumbup