Standard front wing

Standard front wing

Author
Discussion

budgie smuggler

5,385 posts

159 months

Tuesday 31st July 2018
quotequote all
kambites said:
Hmm so they're still allowed five elements, just no fancy turning vanes on the end-plate?
Yes it's mentioned in the link I posted somewhere above. Standardised endplates without vortex generators. The idea being to encourage the teams to bring more air inwards and underneath rather than using 'outwash'.

ajprice

27,492 posts

196 months

Tuesday 31st July 2018
quotequote all
Williams wing


Driller

Original Poster:

8,310 posts

278 months

Tuesday 31st July 2018
quotequote all
When I said standard wing, I wasn’t discounting a standard design and didn’t necessarily mean a standard issue one used by everyone.

It’s really not a big deal is it? Just put in place a set of rules which means it must be a one piece affair with no complicated bits (no air allowed to pass through it?).

The effect on allowing the car behind to stay close through bends would surely help to allow a return to the closer racing of the good old days.

I don’t think this would go against the spirit of F1.

skinny

5,269 posts

235 months

Tuesday 31st July 2018
quotequote all
I think the 5 elements is a requirement in the technical regulations? At least it is I understand for this year. So when if the teams wanted to simplify it further and have 2 elements, they wouldn't be allowed.

Kraken

1,710 posts

200 months

Tuesday 31st July 2018
quotequote all
Depends on your definition of worse racing I suppose.

Sam993

1,302 posts

72 months

Tuesday 31st July 2018
quotequote all
Gaz. said:
reducing the downforce of the front wing will make racing worse but the tail is wagging the dog and F1 is buckling to fan pressure.
Depends how it's achieved, if you look at IndyCar the new car they launched this year reduced the downforce significantly and it made the racing even more exciting (ovals not so much but that's a different story).

PhillipM

6,523 posts

189 months

Tuesday 31st July 2018
quotequote all
Gaz. said:
The multi-element front wing is a bogeyman and reducing the downforce of the front wing will make racing worse but the tail is wagging the dog and F1 is buckling to fan pressure.
The wing is wider and taller, and the bargeboards are 100mm further forward, front end should actually improve slightly if anything.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 31st July 2018
quotequote all
PhillipM said:
Gaz. said:
The multi-element front wing is a bogeyman and reducing the downforce of the front wing will make racing worse but the tail is wagging the dog and F1 is buckling to fan pressure.
The wing is wider and taller, and the bargeboards are 100mm further forward, front end should actually improve slightly if anything.
It will. The new wing is, at least for one major team that I know of, producing more downforce than this year’s.

F1GTRUeno

6,354 posts

218 months

Tuesday 31st July 2018
quotequote all
It should be really simple.

Two elements at most and remove all the st around the sidepods too.

Back to basics.

Driller

Original Poster:

8,310 posts

278 months

Wednesday 1st August 2018
quotequote all
Gaz. said:
Driller said:
It’s really not a big deal is it? Just put in place a set of rules which means it must be a one piece affair with no complicated bits (no air allowed to pass through it?).

The effect on allowing the car behind to stay close through bends would surely help to allow a return to the closer racing of the good old days.
The multi-element front wing is a bogeyman and reducing the downforce of the front wing will make racing worse but the tail is wagging the dog and F1 is buckling to fan pressure.
Are you suggesting that the inability of cars to follow closely behind others through curves is not due to the turbulence of the car in front interfering with the performance of the front wing of the car behind?

Obviously it’s going to be multifactorial but what’s the most significant factor then?

anonymous-user

54 months

Wednesday 1st August 2018
quotequote all
Put a g meter on the cars and stipulate that they must not exceed a certain downforce. This would move the onus more towards mechanical grip and negate the need for all these wing rules etc.

ajprice

27,492 posts

196 months

Wednesday 1st August 2018
quotequote all
F1GTRUeno said:
It should be really simple.

Two elements at most and remove all the st around the sidepods too.

Back to basics.
Yep, it needs a clean up like the 2009 rules that stopped all the winglets, fins, nosecone rabbit ears and all the other junk that crept in.
2008


2009


Edited by ajprice on Wednesday 1st August 14:41

Sam993

1,302 posts

72 months

Wednesday 1st August 2018
quotequote all
ajprice said:
That's a vile looking POS vomit

F1GTRUeno

6,354 posts

218 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
Sam993 said:
ajprice said:
That's a vile looking POS vomit
Not as bad as this



Still far too many elements in the front wing and now they've made it snow shovel sized like 2009 was where they stuck out like a sore thumb. Crap.

ajprice

27,492 posts

196 months

Thursday 2nd August 2018
quotequote all
Ferrari 2019 wing in testing