The Official 2018 Italian Grand Prix Thread **SPOILERS**

The Official 2018 Italian Grand Prix Thread **SPOILERS**

Author
Discussion

37chevy

3,280 posts

157 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
Wh00sher said:
Apologies if this has been posted earlier and I missed it, but jeez ! I`m amazed Kimi even made it to the finish line with tyres in this state eek
that's quite amazing. almost as bad as Hamiltons tyres in China 2007 when he spun coming into the pitlane

Gad-Westy

14,578 posts

214 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
Wh00sher said:
Apologies if this has been posted earlier and I missed it, but jeez ! I`m amazed Kimi even made it to the finish line with tyres in this state eek
Wowsers. Assume that is quite literally down to the canvas on the centre-left part? Can't have been all that far from letting go can it?

rdjohn

6,189 posts

196 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
37chevy said:
Think you’re being a little harsh there. Ferrari didn’t exactly have time to stop their drivers racing and install team orders. There’s no way you’d let them swap in the first corner at Monza, too much going on, if Kimi slowed to let Vettel pass then Lewis would have been up the inside, his start was too good. If Vettel hadn’t mucked it up I’d have expected to see them swap within a couple of laps
We saw at Spa that Seb’s car has something very special to deploy during the first half of the first lap. The passing strategy, if there was one, would have been agreed in the briefings before the start.

I just don’t think that Kimi played-ball.

Digga

40,352 posts

284 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
Wh00sher said:
Apologies if this has been posted earlier and I missed it, but jeez ! I`m amazed Kimi even made it to the finish line with tyres in this state eek
I did think he was doing a very good job of making an extremely tricky situation look easy. There were a few times when the rear broke traction under power where you could notice it.

Anyway, that's not a properly knackered tyre. This is though: hehe


Hungrymc

6,674 posts

138 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
NFC 85 Vette said:
Perhaps, but the pre-race briefing they'd have had, would have discussed all the likely scenarios and how they'd react to each, including lap 1 changes of position.

If they really thought Hamilton wouldn't have a decent enough start to put them under pressure, that's cocky and foolish. It looked as if everyone in a red car had forgotten their script on the day. It also planted the seed that means Hamilton knows he just has to be close enough to unsettle them, and any plan they had, starts to fall to pieces.

Unfortunately, to turn this around, it needs a robust pecking order in the team, right at a time where Kimi's doing quite well on his own merit (he does blow hot and cold, but this has been his strongest season in a long time).
I think you're asking a lot to try and swap positions in the first few turns. There is too much potential for chaos. The main priority is to get both cars through cleanly and ideally in 1st and 2nd, but that isn't straight forward. Its then very hard to let one car past when it has another car right on its tail and closing. Maybe in hindsight, it would have been better to accept that Lewis was likely to follow Seb through, but their best possible outcome was to keep the Merc behind both Ferraris and then swap the cars when safe to do so (which was what I'm sure they were aiming at).

I do think they made an error with qualifying. Maybe they didn't believe in the benefit of slipstreaming (lost time in curve grande and parabolica vs speed at the end of the straights). Maybe they expected Seb to be 2 tenths clear of the Mercs and thought he'd tow Kimi into second?

The Surveyor

7,576 posts

238 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
NFC 85 Vette said:
.......

Unfortunately, to turn this around, it needs a robust pecking order in the team, right at a time where Kimi's doing quite well on his own merit (he does blow hot and cold, but this has been his strongest season in a long time).
As people have said earlier on the thread, Kimi is fast at the moment because he's driving for a contract. Ferrari need to get that sorted so he's back driving for the team rather than his future.

You are 100% on the pecking order, Ferrari also need to focus their efforts on getting Seb to the top of the WDC table rather than the ridiculous farce shown in Q3 on Saturday which put Kimi on pole.

mattyn1

5,768 posts

156 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
rdjohn said:
We saw at Spa that Seb’s car has something very special to deploy during the first half of the first lap. The passing strategy, if there was one, would have been agreed in the briefings before the start.

I just don’t think that Kimi played-ball.
Or, as we have seen before, the team orders were not explicit enough - remember Kimi saying "just tell me what you want me to do"?

The orders to Bottas were very direct - "do not let Kimi pass you".

37chevy

3,280 posts

157 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
The Surveyor said:
You are 100% on the pecking order, Ferrari also need to focus their efforts on getting Seb to the top of the WDC table rather than the ridiculous farce shown in Q3 on Saturday which put Kimi on pole.
ridiculous farce? how so? kimi had no more a tow from Vettel than Vettel had from the Mercedes, vettel didn't get a clean enough lap and suffered for it, kimi had to push to ensure a Ferrari front row because it was so tight.

37chevy

3,280 posts

157 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
mattyn1 said:
Or, as we have seen before, the team orders were not explicit enough - remember Kimi saying "just tell me what you want me to do"?

The orders to Bottas were very direct - "do not let Kimi pass you".
yes that made me smile. its almost as though Ferrari are still haunted by the team orders saga of the Schumacher days and the Fernando is faster than you order and didn't want the bad press from another order, couple that with Kimi whos a no BS kinda guy, plus he probably wanted the whole world to know he was moving over rather than Vettel getting the better of him on track




Edited by 37chevy on Tuesday 4th September 09:24

Derek Smith

45,703 posts

249 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
Hungrymc said:
NFC 85 Vette said:
Perhaps, but the pre-race briefing they'd have had, would have discussed all the likely scenarios and how they'd react to each, including lap 1 changes of position.

If they really thought Hamilton wouldn't have a decent enough start to put them under pressure, that's cocky and foolish. It looked as if everyone in a red car had forgotten their script on the day. It also planted the seed that means Hamilton knows he just has to be close enough to unsettle them, and any plan they had, starts to fall to pieces.

Unfortunately, to turn this around, it needs a robust pecking order in the team, right at a time where Kimi's doing quite well on his own merit (he does blow hot and cold, but this has been his strongest season in a long time).
I think you're asking a lot to try and swap positions in the first few turns. There is too much potential for chaos. The main priority is to get both cars through cleanly and ideally in 1st and 2nd, but that isn't straight forward. Its then very hard to let one car past when it has another car right on its tail and closing. Maybe in hindsight, it would have been better to accept that Lewis was likely to follow Seb through, but their best possible outcome was to keep the Merc behind both Ferraris and then swap the cars when safe to do so (which was what I'm sure they were aiming at).

I do think they made an error with qualifying. Maybe they didn't believe in the benefit of slipstreaming (lost time in curve grande and parabolica vs speed at the end of the straights). Maybe they expected Seb to be 2 tenths clear of the Mercs and thought he'd tow Kimi into second?
If KR had slowed then he would probably have let bot SV and LH through. I would have thought it would have been better to allow the cars to go as fast as they could around the first lap and then let SV pass on the pit straight.

I would assume that Ferrari had a plan, one agreed with the drivers. KR seems to me the type of person who would stick with a plan. Not for him making it up as he goes along. Whatever, it was a mess of Ferrari's manufacture. The plan didn't work.

Regarding qualifying, Ferrari wanted to get both cars on the front row. SV made a small error on his fastest lap and it not only cost him a tenth or two, but pole as well. Had he not slipped up, he'd have got it without problem. Had KR gone a bit slower he would have been third.

On the day, I had little doubt that the Ferraris had the edge in top speed. The main thing that confused matters I think was slip streaming. LH was able to stay with KR with apparently little effort. It would have saved him fuel as well. He'd move out of the slipstream on occasion, or put in a slower lap, but was able to use the slipstream to catch up again. I noticed that LH was significantly slower around the Parabolica, losing between a tenth and at times 4/10ths. I assumed this was to cool the left hand side of the car. His front left was marked and was told that the temperature of the rear left was critical.

Perhaps that's why the Ferraris used their tyres so quickly. Had KR taken it easy around the Parabolica, LH would have had an easy pass into Retifilio. In other words, he had to keep it on the limit every time whereas LH could pick and choose.

But then, I could be wrong.




Deesee

Original Poster:

8,461 posts

84 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
Hungrymc said:
NFC 85 Vette said:
Perhaps, but the pre-race briefing they'd have had, would have discussed all the likely scenarios and how they'd react to each, including lap 1 changes of position.

If they really thought Hamilton wouldn't have a decent enough start to put them under pressure, that's cocky and foolish. It looked as if everyone in a red car had forgotten their script on the day. It also planted the seed that means Hamilton knows he just has to be close enough to unsettle them, and any plan they had, starts to fall to pieces.

Unfortunately, to turn this around, it needs a robust pecking order in the team, right at a time where Kimi's doing quite well on his own merit (he does blow hot and cold, but this has been his strongest season in a long time).
I think you're asking a lot to try and swap positions in the first few turns. There is too much potential for chaos. The main priority is to get both cars through cleanly and ideally in 1st and 2nd, but that isn't straight forward. Its then very hard to let one car past when it has another car right on its tail and closing. Maybe in hindsight, it would have been better to accept that Lewis was likely to follow Seb through, but their best possible outcome was to keep the Merc behind both Ferraris and then swap the cars when safe to do so (which was what I'm sure they were aiming at).

I do think they made an error with qualifying. Maybe they didn't believe in the benefit of slipstreaming (lost time in curve grande and parabolica vs speed at the end of the straights). Maybe they expected Seb to be 2 tenths clear of the Mercs and thought he'd tow Kimi into second?
Looking at it all now with the benefit of hindsight I do wonder if Kimi knows he's not going to get another year at Ferrari as if he were you would expect the pre-race briefing to have been along the lines of get going in 1-2 formation and a few laps in when things settle down we'll swap you over. It's almost as if Kimi thought "*** it, I am going for the win" and Vettel knew it before the race started hence he had to race his team mate as well as Hamilton. I still think that Vettel should have played the long game and not have tried to win the race on the first lap as when you haven't got pole you can't do that. Hamilton, Bottas and Mercedes basically out foxed them on their own turf which after Silverstone I think they wanted to do even more (at least in Hamilton's case).

The victory lap in formation while antagonistic was no less so than Ferrari displaying the Union flag in their garage after winning at Silverstone.

While Mercedes are a German team they are based in Brackley and Brixworth so there are deep British connections that I am sure played a part in the whole weekend.

Anyway let's see if Vettel and Ferrari can get some points back at Singapore.... the pressure is certainly on.

Clockwork Cupcake

74,615 posts

273 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
cb1965 said:
While Mercedes are a German team they are based in Brackley and Brixworth so there are deep British connections that I am sure played a part in the whole weekend.
They're about as German as Force India are Indian. smile

The Moose

22,867 posts

210 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
I think there was also a ‘Monza factor’ at play on Sunday.

The Ferrari team were getting a hardon with the thoughts of an amazing afternoon of racing between their two drivers in Italy.

The plan was they would get a great start, pull away from the pack, swap around between 1st and 2nd to give their beloved Tifosi something to get excited about...and then somewhere towards the end, their golden boy would take the lead and bring it home.

Obviously it all went a bit wrong.

RichB

51,605 posts

285 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
cb1965 said:
... Ferrari displaying the Union flag in their garage after winning at Silverstone...
I didn't know they did that. I am sure it's all a bit of banter between the teams, unfortunately the fans don't see that side of it and get wound up.

The Surveyor

7,576 posts

238 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
37chevy said:
The Surveyor said:
You are 100% on the pecking order, Ferrari also need to focus their efforts on getting Seb to the top of the WDC table rather than the ridiculous farce shown in Q3 on Saturday which put Kimi on pole.
ridiculous farce? how so? kimi had no more a tow from Vettel than Vettel had from the Mercedes, vettel didn't get a clean enough lap and suffered for it, kimi had to push to ensure a Ferrari front row because it was so tight.
Vettel will only win the WDC this year if he has the full backing of Ferrari, he is under enough pressure at the moment without Ferrari adding to that by gifting Kimi that advantage in qualifying. The aero disadvantage would indeed be marginal, the psychological disadvantage is much more significant IMHO.

Roofless Toothless

5,678 posts

133 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
rdjohn said:
We saw at Spa that Seb’s car has something very special to deploy during the first half of the first lap.
If that is the case, then so did the two Force Indias.

My reading of it was that Hamilton was slow, for whatever reason, and got swallowed up by everyone behind.

Daston

6,075 posts

204 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
Roofless Toothless said:
If that is the case, then so did the two Force Indias.

My reading of it was that Hamilton was slow, for whatever reason, and got swallowed up by everyone behind.
Does that not normally happen at the start of Spa, the leader always seems to get entre the straight and everyone gains through slip streaming. All it takes is a wide line onto the straight or a few mph down and you get swamped.

Targarama

14,635 posts

284 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
Daston said:
Roofless Toothless said:
If that is the case, then so did the two Force Indias.

My reading of it was that Hamilton was slow, for whatever reason, and got swallowed up by everyone behind.
Does that not normally happen at the start of Spa, the leader always seems to get entre the straight and everyone gains through slip streaming. All it takes is a wide line onto the straight or a few mph down and you get swamped.
One of the Ch4 replays showed Lewis could not get 8th gear on that first lap where he was passed/caught by the top 5 cars. Maybe a problem with his KERs or something mean't with a full fuel load he couldn't pull the same acceleration, but got to a similar top speed by the end of the straight.

smarty156

372 posts

87 months

Tuesday 4th September 2018
quotequote all
Apologies as I haven't read all the posts but my take on the first lap collision is this:
If you look at the heli shots both Vettel and Hamilton were catching Kimi on the approach to the chicane. Vettel had 3 choices: 1. Back off a bit so as not to run into his team mate 2. Keep his foot in but pull to the left to give himself more room (and potentially open up a pass) 3. Run into the back of his team mate.
Clearly 3 isn't on and if he chose 1 Hamilton would have passed him on the left in to the chicane. So his only viable option was 2, which is actually what he chose.
Once Hamilton got alongside though he should have let it go and passed him on the straight instead of trying to block the pass.

As I say, just my take but from the heli shots it's pretty clear. Surprised the commentators didn't pick that up.