WDCs in not the best car?

WDCs in not the best car?

Author
Discussion

chunder27

2,309 posts

209 months

Wednesday 5th September 2018
quotequote all
Scheckter in 1980. That Ferrari was a piece of dump

LP670

825 posts

127 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
chunder27 said:
Scheckter in 1980. That Ferrari was a piece of dump
Indeed it was, it also didn't win any titles in 1980 wink

Dr Z

3,396 posts

172 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
2012 Vettel.

Messy and hard fought campaign.

I know people like lump the four Red Bull championship years into the 'dominance' category but the 2012 RB was most definitely not a dominant car.

angrymoby

2,613 posts

179 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Dr Z said:
2012 Vettel.

Messy and hard fought campaign.

I know people like lump the four Red Bull championship years into the 'dominance' category but the 2012 RB was most definitely not a dominant car.
not a chance, the RB8 won 7 races compared to the 4 for the F2012 ...& it also finished 60pts clear of the Ferrari in the WCC

paua

5,762 posts

144 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
LP670 said:
chunder27 said:
Scheckter in 1980. That Ferrari was a piece of dump
Indeed it was, it also didn't win any titles in 1980 wink
Indeed, Williams & Jones might have a comment on this. First of many for FW.

Mark-C

5,138 posts

206 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
paua said:
LP670 said:
chunder27 said:
Scheckter in 1980. That Ferrari was a piece of dump
Indeed it was, it also didn't win any titles in 1980 wink
Indeed, Williams & Jones might have a comment on this. First of many for FW.
Meanwhile Scheckter DNQ'd the Ferrari in Canada in 1980!

In 1979 when Schecker won the championship I'd say the Ferrari and Williams were very equally matched.

Dr Z

3,396 posts

172 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
angrymoby said:
Dr Z said:
2012 Vettel.

Messy and hard fought campaign.

I know people like lump the four Red Bull championship years into the 'dominance' category but the 2012 RB was most definitely not a dominant car.
not a chance, the RB8 won 7 races compared to the 4 for the F2012 ...& it also finished 60pts clear of the Ferrari in the WCC
Of the 7 race wins, 5 were lights to flag and of those Vettel only enjoyed 3 wins like that (2 won from pole position).

The RB8's average qualifying position is 4.9 +/- 4, which is the worst of the 4 years RB won the championships in. The Mercedes 2014-2016 is light years ahead in comparison.

The McLaren was faster on pace that year (9 pole positions vs 7 for RB), and this is the nadir of the chocolate tyre era when qualifying pace is very important. A car starting on average in the 3rd row has very little hope of winning the Championship, and especially one as volatile as 2012, where consistency is rewarded.

With 13 races done and 7 to go that year Fernando was leading the Championship and the points gap to Vettel was 39 points. Vettel won the next four races on the bounce and finished on the podium twice in the remaining three. That was the Championship.

I think in the modern era this is one of the furthest a driver had come from behind to take the title in the time frame he did--I looked at the stats quite a while ago so I'm just going from memory on this point. smile

generationx

6,773 posts

106 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Mark-C said:
paua said:
LP670 said:
chunder27 said:
Scheckter in 1980. That Ferrari was a piece of dump
Indeed it was, it also didn't win any titles in 1980 wink
Indeed, Williams & Jones might have a comment on this. First of many for FW.
Meanwhile Scheckter DNQ'd the Ferrari in Canada in 1980!

In 1979 when Schecker won the championship I'd say the Ferrari and Williams were very equally matched.
I think Ferrari were fortunate that the FW07 didn't properly emerge until midway through the season, otherwise the results may have been different. Ferrari only won two races in the second half of the year.

The FW07 was to all intents and purposes a "better Lotus 79", and the Ferrari underbody aero was severely hampered by the wide flat-12.

The Lotus that year (the 80 to start with) wasn't properly sorted, and Ligier didn't understand why their JS11 worked sometimes and not others, again due to the aero. McLaren were nowhere and there wasn't really anyone else apart from occasional flashes by the horrifyingly unreliable Renaults.

Ferrari were at the right place at the right time.

angrymoby

2,613 posts

179 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Dr Z said:
Of the 7 race wins, 5 were lights to flag and of those Vettel only enjoyed 3 wins like that (2 won from pole position).

The RB8's average qualifying position is 4.9 +/- 4, which is the worst of the 4 years RB won the championships in. The Mercedes 2014-2016 is light years ahead in comparison.

The McLaren was faster on pace that year (9 pole positions vs 7 for RB), and this is the nadir of the chocolate tyre era when qualifying pace is very important. A car starting on average in the 3rd row has very little hope of winning the Championship, and especially one as volatile as 2012, where consistency is rewarded.

With 13 races done and 7 to go that year Fernando was leading the Championship and the points gap to Vettel was 39 points. Vettel won the next four races on the bounce and finished on the podium twice in the remaining three. That was the Championship.

I think in the modern era this is one of the furthest a driver had come from behind to take the title in the time frame he did--I looked at the stats quite a while ago so I'm just going from memory on this point. smile
faster isn't always 'better'

& anyone claiming the mp4-27 over the season as whole was the better car, is ...well, brave

no one disputes that the Ferrari & Mclaren were on terms with the RB8 for the first half of that season, but it mullered them in the second half

It wasn't Red Bulls most dominant car/year ...but again, that doesn't mean it wasn't dominant either


Edited by angrymoby on Thursday 6th September 12:42

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
I was not born in 1970 but what about Jochen Rindt?

Was the Lotus Ford the best car that year?

Tragic that Jochen Rindt died before winning the Championship frown

Edited by anonymous-user on Thursday 6th September 19:44

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

153 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
ELUSIVEJIM said:
Terrible that Jochen Rindt is the only Champion to have died achieving that success.
This would benefit from a rephrase Jim....

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
The thing is I don't think anyone has managed to win the WC in a car that was significantly worse than another for the whole season.

The closest I can remember anyone coming was Alonso in 2012 and Schumacher in 1997/1998

Dr Z

3,396 posts

172 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
angrymoby said:
faster isn't always 'better'

& anyone claiming the mp4-27 over the season as whole was the better car, is ...well, brave

no one disputes that the Ferrari & Mclaren were on terms with the RB8 for the first half of that season, but it mullered them in the second half

It wasn't Red Bulls most dominant car/year ...but again, that doesn't mean it wasn't dominant either
Well, we have to first define dominance to determine if the RB8 was dominant or not.

If we look through history, cars that have collected 40% or more wins in a season have tended to win both Championships (and pretty comfortably in most cases). I would put my dominance cut off point there at 40%. Generally, those seasons that have any one car/team not able to win 40% or more races are often the most interesting and competitive.

The MP4/27 won 7 races too, as did the RB8, which is only 35% of the races in that season. If we say the RB8 was dominant, we'd have to say the MP4/23 was also dominant (winning 33% of the races in 2008) and I very much doubt we'd say that.

Some win percentages:

Year Team Win %
1950 Alfa Romeo 100
1951 Alfa Romeo 57
1952 Ferrari 100
1953 Ferrari 87.5
1954 Maserati/Mercedes 75
1955 Mercedes 83
1956 Ferrari 71
1957 Maserati 57
1958 Ferrari 20
1959 Cooper 62.5
1960 Cooper 67
1961 Ferrari 62.5
1962 BRM 44
1963 Lotus 70
1964 Ferrari 30
1965 Lotus 60
1966 Brabham 44
1967 Brabham 36
1968 Lotus 42
1969 Matra 55
1970 Lotus 46
1971 Tyrrell 64
1972 Lotus 42
1973 Tyrrell 33
1974 McLaren 27
1975 Ferrari 43
1976 McLaren 37.5
1977 Ferrari 24
1978 Lotus 50
1979 Ferrari 40
1980 Williams 43
1981 Brabham 20
1982 Williams 6
1983 Brabham 27
1984 McLaren 75
1985 McLaren 37.5
1986 McLaren 25
1987 Williams 56.25
1988 McLaren 94
1989 McLaren 62.5
1990 McLaren 37.5
1991 McLaren 50
1992 Williams 62.5
1993 Williams 62.5
1994 Benetton 50
1995 Benetton 65
1996 Williams 75
1997 Williams 47
1998 McLaren 56
1999 McLaren 44
2000 Ferrari 59
2001 Ferrari 53
2002 Ferrari 88
2003 Ferrari 50
2004 Ferrari 83
2005 Renault 42
2006 Renault 44
2007 Ferrari 53
2008 McLaren 33
2009 Brawn 47
2010 Red Bull 47
2011 Red Bull 63
2012 Red Bull 35
2013 Red Bull 68
2014 Mercedes  84
2015 Mercedes 84
2016 Mercedes 90
2017 Mercedes 60


Bolded are years when other cars won more races and the WDC would be a candidate for achieving it in a lesser car. RB8's record is a bit too low for me to consider it a dominant car.

Edited by Dr Z on Thursday 6th September 18:11

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Vocal Minority said:
This would benefit from a rephrase Jim....
boxedin

TheLimla

1,829 posts

195 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
1995 - iirc whilst the Williams was probably the quicker car, it was another tightly packaged newey design that didn't have as bigger fuel tank as the Benetton. This meant they couldn't run the optimum fuel strategies like the Benetton could.

angrymoby

2,613 posts

179 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Dr Z said:
Well, we have to first define dominance to determine if the RB8 was dominant or not.

If we look through history, cars that have collected 40% or more wins in a season have tended to win both Championships (and pretty comfortably in most cases). I would put my dominance cut off point there at 40%. Generally, those seasons that have any one car/team not able to win 40% or more races are often the most interesting and competitive.

The MP4/27 won 7 races too, as did the RB8, which is only 35% of the races in that season. If we say the RB8 was dominant, we'd have to say the MP4/23 was also dominant (winning 33% of the races in 2008) and I very much doubt we'd say that.

Some win percentages:

Year Team Win %
1950 Alfa Romeo 100
1951 Alfa Romeo 57
1952 Ferrari 100
1953 Ferrari 87.5
1954 Maserati/Mercedes 75
1955 Mercedes 83
1956 Ferrari 71
1957 Maserati 57
1958 Ferrari 20
1959 Cooper 62.5
1960 Cooper 67
1961 Ferrari 62.5
1962 BRM 44
1963 Lotus 70
1964 Ferrari 30
1965 Lotus 60
1966 Brabham 44
1967 Brabham 36
1968 Lotus 42
1969 Matra 55
1970 Lotus 46
1971 Tyrrell 64
1972 Lotus 42
1973 Tyrrell 33
1974 McLaren 27
1975 Ferrari 43
1976 McLaren 37.5
1977 Ferrari 24
1978 Lotus 50
1979 Ferrari 40
1980 Williams 43
1981 Brabham 20
1982 Williams 6
1983 Brabham 27
1984 McLaren 75
1985 McLaren 37.5
1986 McLaren 25
1987 Williams 56.25
1988 McLaren 94
1989 McLaren 62.5
1990 McLaren 37.5
1991 McLaren 50
1992 Williams 62.5
1993 Williams 62.5
1994 Benetton 50
1995 Benetton 65
1996 Williams 75
1997 Williams 47
1998 McLaren 56
1999 McLaren 44
2000 Ferrari 59
2001 Ferrari 53
2002 Ferrari 88
2003 Ferrari 50
2004 Ferrari 83
2005 Renault 42
2006 Renault 44
2007 Ferrari 53
2008 McLaren 33
2009 Brawn 47
2010 Red Bull 47
2011 Red Bull 63
2012 Red Bull 35
2013 Red Bull 68
2014 Mercedes  84
2015 Mercedes 84
2016 Mercedes 90
2017 Mercedes 60


Bolded are years when other cars won more races and the WDC would be a candidate for achieving it in a lesser car. RB8's record is a bit too low for me to consider it a dominant car.

Edited by Dr Z on Thursday 6th September 18:11
brilliant & cheers for that Z ...certainly starts to give a truer picture

2012 is interesting as i'd forgotten how many wins McLaren had had ...probably because of the amount of dnf's/ mechanical issues it had (& Hamilton going into full on meltdown mode)

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
Gaz. said:
What full meltdown did he have in 2012?
He didn't, some on here manufacture a false reality based on their personal feelings about drivers and those feelings are usually garnered from the press rather than via any thinking for themselves!

angrymoby

2,613 posts

179 months

Thursday 6th September 2018
quotequote all
cb1965 said:
He didn't, some on here manufacture a false reality based on their personal feelings about drivers and those feelings are usually garnered from the press rather than via any thinking for themselves!
hands up, it was a mistake with 2011

no idea what you're going on about re: press etc etc tbh


Edited by angrymoby on Thursday 6th September 21:22

anonymous-user

55 months

Friday 7th September 2018
quotequote all
angrymoby said:
no idea what you're going on about re: press etc etc tbh
The media control your thinking rather than you actually looking at the facts! Don't worry, you're not alone. HTH smile

coppice

8,624 posts

145 months

Friday 7th September 2018
quotequote all
As an old fart , perhaps I may offer some longer perspective than the Red Bull era ?

1970 - Lotus 72 was the best car , once they'd got it working. And it was so good that the last F1 race (not GP) it won was 4 years later .

1966/67 - the Brabham Repco didn't have as much power as many, but it worked .

1972- so evenly matched at the front - Stewart , Ickx , Fittipaldi in Tyrrell, Ferrari and Lotus (72!) .

Lauda won in his Ferrari in 1977 , but Lotus's star was in the ascendant and the 78 was as good as anything.

82- Rosberg's Williams I'd say was the penultimate time the best car didn't win . Not that there was a best car that year - so close. But nothing was better than Rosberg's Williams at 83 Monaco , as long as a bloke called Keke was driving !

86- Prost- the McLaren was no Williams ...