WDCs in not the best car?
Discussion
Dr Z said:
2012 Vettel.
Messy and hard fought campaign.
I know people like lump the four Red Bull championship years into the 'dominance' category but the 2012 RB was most definitely not a dominant car.
not a chance, the RB8 won 7 races compared to the 4 for the F2012 ...& it also finished 60pts clear of the Ferrari in the WCCMessy and hard fought campaign.
I know people like lump the four Red Bull championship years into the 'dominance' category but the 2012 RB was most definitely not a dominant car.
paua said:
LP670 said:
chunder27 said:
Scheckter in 1980. That Ferrari was a piece of dump
Indeed it was, it also didn't win any titles in 1980 In 1979 when Schecker won the championship I'd say the Ferrari and Williams were very equally matched.
angrymoby said:
Dr Z said:
2012 Vettel.
Messy and hard fought campaign.
I know people like lump the four Red Bull championship years into the 'dominance' category but the 2012 RB was most definitely not a dominant car.
not a chance, the RB8 won 7 races compared to the 4 for the F2012 ...& it also finished 60pts clear of the Ferrari in the WCCMessy and hard fought campaign.
I know people like lump the four Red Bull championship years into the 'dominance' category but the 2012 RB was most definitely not a dominant car.
The RB8's average qualifying position is 4.9 +/- 4, which is the worst of the 4 years RB won the championships in. The Mercedes 2014-2016 is light years ahead in comparison.
The McLaren was faster on pace that year (9 pole positions vs 7 for RB), and this is the nadir of the chocolate tyre era when qualifying pace is very important. A car starting on average in the 3rd row has very little hope of winning the Championship, and especially one as volatile as 2012, where consistency is rewarded.
With 13 races done and 7 to go that year Fernando was leading the Championship and the points gap to Vettel was 39 points. Vettel won the next four races on the bounce and finished on the podium twice in the remaining three. That was the Championship.
I think in the modern era this is one of the furthest a driver had come from behind to take the title in the time frame he did--I looked at the stats quite a while ago so I'm just going from memory on this point.
Mark-C said:
paua said:
LP670 said:
chunder27 said:
Scheckter in 1980. That Ferrari was a piece of dump
Indeed it was, it also didn't win any titles in 1980 In 1979 when Schecker won the championship I'd say the Ferrari and Williams were very equally matched.
The FW07 was to all intents and purposes a "better Lotus 79", and the Ferrari underbody aero was severely hampered by the wide flat-12.
The Lotus that year (the 80 to start with) wasn't properly sorted, and Ligier didn't understand why their JS11 worked sometimes and not others, again due to the aero. McLaren were nowhere and there wasn't really anyone else apart from occasional flashes by the horrifyingly unreliable Renaults.
Ferrari were at the right place at the right time.
Dr Z said:
Of the 7 race wins, 5 were lights to flag and of those Vettel only enjoyed 3 wins like that (2 won from pole position).
The RB8's average qualifying position is 4.9 +/- 4, which is the worst of the 4 years RB won the championships in. The Mercedes 2014-2016 is light years ahead in comparison.
The McLaren was faster on pace that year (9 pole positions vs 7 for RB), and this is the nadir of the chocolate tyre era when qualifying pace is very important. A car starting on average in the 3rd row has very little hope of winning the Championship, and especially one as volatile as 2012, where consistency is rewarded.
With 13 races done and 7 to go that year Fernando was leading the Championship and the points gap to Vettel was 39 points. Vettel won the next four races on the bounce and finished on the podium twice in the remaining three. That was the Championship.
I think in the modern era this is one of the furthest a driver had come from behind to take the title in the time frame he did--I looked at the stats quite a while ago so I'm just going from memory on this point.
faster isn't always 'better'The RB8's average qualifying position is 4.9 +/- 4, which is the worst of the 4 years RB won the championships in. The Mercedes 2014-2016 is light years ahead in comparison.
The McLaren was faster on pace that year (9 pole positions vs 7 for RB), and this is the nadir of the chocolate tyre era when qualifying pace is very important. A car starting on average in the 3rd row has very little hope of winning the Championship, and especially one as volatile as 2012, where consistency is rewarded.
With 13 races done and 7 to go that year Fernando was leading the Championship and the points gap to Vettel was 39 points. Vettel won the next four races on the bounce and finished on the podium twice in the remaining three. That was the Championship.
I think in the modern era this is one of the furthest a driver had come from behind to take the title in the time frame he did--I looked at the stats quite a while ago so I'm just going from memory on this point.
& anyone claiming the mp4-27 over the season as whole was the better car, is ...well, brave
no one disputes that the Ferrari & Mclaren were on terms with the RB8 for the first half of that season, but it mullered them in the second half
It wasn't Red Bulls most dominant car/year ...but again, that doesn't mean it wasn't dominant either
Edited by angrymoby on Thursday 6th September 12:42
angrymoby said:
faster isn't always 'better'
& anyone claiming the mp4-27 over the season as whole was the better car, is ...well, brave
no one disputes that the Ferrari & Mclaren were on terms with the RB8 for the first half of that season, but it mullered them in the second half
It wasn't Red Bulls most dominant car/year ...but again, that doesn't mean it wasn't dominant either
Well, we have to first define dominance to determine if the RB8 was dominant or not.& anyone claiming the mp4-27 over the season as whole was the better car, is ...well, brave
no one disputes that the Ferrari & Mclaren were on terms with the RB8 for the first half of that season, but it mullered them in the second half
It wasn't Red Bulls most dominant car/year ...but again, that doesn't mean it wasn't dominant either
If we look through history, cars that have collected 40% or more wins in a season have tended to win both Championships (and pretty comfortably in most cases). I would put my dominance cut off point there at 40%. Generally, those seasons that have any one car/team not able to win 40% or more races are often the most interesting and competitive.
The MP4/27 won 7 races too, as did the RB8, which is only 35% of the races in that season. If we say the RB8 was dominant, we'd have to say the MP4/23 was also dominant (winning 33% of the races in 2008) and I very much doubt we'd say that.
Some win percentages:
Year | Team | Win % |
1950 | Alfa Romeo | 100 |
1951 | Alfa Romeo | 57 |
1952 | Ferrari | 100 |
1953 | Ferrari | 87.5 |
1954 | Maserati/Mercedes | 75 |
1955 | Mercedes | 83 |
1956 | Ferrari | 71 |
1957 | Maserati | 57 |
1958 | Ferrari | 20 |
---|---|---|
1959 | Cooper | 62.5 |
1960 | Cooper | 67 |
1961 | Ferrari | 62.5 |
1962 | BRM | 44 |
1963 | Lotus | 70 |
1964 | Ferrari | 30 |
1965 | Lotus | 60 |
1966 | Brabham | 44 |
1967 | Brabham | 36 |
1968 | Lotus | 42 |
1969 | Matra | 55 |
1970 | Lotus | 46 |
1971 | Tyrrell | 64 |
1972 | Lotus | 42 |
1973 | Tyrrell | 33 |
1974 | McLaren | 27 |
1975 | Ferrari | 43 |
1976 | McLaren | 37.5 |
1977 | Ferrari | 24 |
1978 | Lotus | 50 |
1979 | Ferrari | 40 |
1980 | Williams | 43 |
1981 | Brabham | 20 |
1982 | Williams | 6 |
1983 | Brabham | 27 |
1984 | McLaren | 75 |
1985 | McLaren | 37.5 |
1986 | McLaren | 25 |
1987 | Williams | 56.25 |
1988 | McLaren | 94 |
1989 | McLaren | 62.5 |
1990 | McLaren | 37.5 |
1991 | McLaren | 50 |
1992 | Williams | 62.5 |
1993 | Williams | 62.5 |
1994 | Benetton | 50 |
1995 | Benetton | 65 |
1996 | Williams | 75 |
1997 | Williams | 47 |
1998 | McLaren | 56 |
1999 | McLaren | 44 |
2000 | Ferrari | 59 |
2001 | Ferrari | 53 |
2002 | Ferrari | 88 |
2003 | Ferrari | 50 |
2004 | Ferrari | 83 |
2005 | Renault | 42 |
2006 | Renault | 44 |
2007 | Ferrari | 53 |
2008 | McLaren | 33 |
2009 | Brawn | 47 |
2010 | Red Bull | 47 |
2011 | Red Bull | 63 |
2012 | Red Bull | 35 |
2013 | Red Bull | 68 |
2014 | Mercedes | 84 |
2015 | Mercedes | 84 |
2016 | Mercedes | 90 |
2017 | Mercedes | 60 |
Bolded are years when other cars won more races and the WDC would be a candidate for achieving it in a lesser car. RB8's record is a bit too low for me to consider it a dominant car.
Edited by Dr Z on Thursday 6th September 18:11
Dr Z said:
Well, we have to first define dominance to determine if the RB8 was dominant or not.
If we look through history, cars that have collected 40% or more wins in a season have tended to win both Championships (and pretty comfortably in most cases). I would put my dominance cut off point there at 40%. Generally, those seasons that have any one car/team not able to win 40% or more races are often the most interesting and competitive.
The MP4/27 won 7 races too, as did the RB8, which is only 35% of the races in that season. If we say the RB8 was dominant, we'd have to say the MP4/23 was also dominant (winning 33% of the races in 2008) and I very much doubt we'd say that.
Some win percentages:
Bolded are years when other cars won more races and the WDC would be a candidate for achieving it in a lesser car. RB8's record is a bit too low for me to consider it a dominant car.
brilliant & cheers for that Z ...certainly starts to give a truer picture If we look through history, cars that have collected 40% or more wins in a season have tended to win both Championships (and pretty comfortably in most cases). I would put my dominance cut off point there at 40%. Generally, those seasons that have any one car/team not able to win 40% or more races are often the most interesting and competitive.
The MP4/27 won 7 races too, as did the RB8, which is only 35% of the races in that season. If we say the RB8 was dominant, we'd have to say the MP4/23 was also dominant (winning 33% of the races in 2008) and I very much doubt we'd say that.
Some win percentages:
Year | Team | Win % |
1950 | Alfa Romeo | 100 |
1951 | Alfa Romeo | 57 |
1952 | Ferrari | 100 |
1953 | Ferrari | 87.5 |
1954 | Maserati/Mercedes | 75 |
1955 | Mercedes | 83 |
1956 | Ferrari | 71 |
1957 | Maserati | 57 |
1958 | Ferrari | 20 |
---|---|---|
1959 | Cooper | 62.5 |
1960 | Cooper | 67 |
1961 | Ferrari | 62.5 |
1962 | BRM | 44 |
1963 | Lotus | 70 |
1964 | Ferrari | 30 |
1965 | Lotus | 60 |
1966 | Brabham | 44 |
1967 | Brabham | 36 |
1968 | Lotus | 42 |
1969 | Matra | 55 |
1970 | Lotus | 46 |
1971 | Tyrrell | 64 |
1972 | Lotus | 42 |
1973 | Tyrrell | 33 |
1974 | McLaren | 27 |
1975 | Ferrari | 43 |
1976 | McLaren | 37.5 |
1977 | Ferrari | 24 |
1978 | Lotus | 50 |
1979 | Ferrari | 40 |
1980 | Williams | 43 |
1981 | Brabham | 20 |
1982 | Williams | 6 |
1983 | Brabham | 27 |
1984 | McLaren | 75 |
1985 | McLaren | 37.5 |
1986 | McLaren | 25 |
1987 | Williams | 56.25 |
1988 | McLaren | 94 |
1989 | McLaren | 62.5 |
1990 | McLaren | 37.5 |
1991 | McLaren | 50 |
1992 | Williams | 62.5 |
1993 | Williams | 62.5 |
1994 | Benetton | 50 |
1995 | Benetton | 65 |
1996 | Williams | 75 |
1997 | Williams | 47 |
1998 | McLaren | 56 |
1999 | McLaren | 44 |
2000 | Ferrari | 59 |
2001 | Ferrari | 53 |
2002 | Ferrari | 88 |
2003 | Ferrari | 50 |
2004 | Ferrari | 83 |
2005 | Renault | 42 |
2006 | Renault | 44 |
2007 | Ferrari | 53 |
2008 | McLaren | 33 |
2009 | Brawn | 47 |
2010 | Red Bull | 47 |
2011 | Red Bull | 63 |
2012 | Red Bull | 35 |
2013 | Red Bull | 68 |
2014 | Mercedes | 84 |
2015 | Mercedes | 84 |
2016 | Mercedes | 90 |
2017 | Mercedes | 60 |
Bolded are years when other cars won more races and the WDC would be a candidate for achieving it in a lesser car. RB8's record is a bit too low for me to consider it a dominant car.
Edited by Dr Z on Thursday 6th September 18:11
2012 is interesting as i'd forgotten how many wins McLaren had had ...probably because of the amount of dnf's/ mechanical issues it had (& Hamilton going into full on meltdown mode)
cb1965 said:
He didn't, some on here manufacture a false reality based on their personal feelings about drivers and those feelings are usually garnered from the press rather than via any thinking for themselves!
hands up, it was a mistake with 2011no idea what you're going on about re: press etc etc tbh
Edited by angrymoby on Thursday 6th September 21:22
As an old fart , perhaps I may offer some longer perspective than the Red Bull era ?
1970 - Lotus 72 was the best car , once they'd got it working. And it was so good that the last F1 race (not GP) it won was 4 years later .
1966/67 - the Brabham Repco didn't have as much power as many, but it worked .
1972- so evenly matched at the front - Stewart , Ickx , Fittipaldi in Tyrrell, Ferrari and Lotus (72!) .
Lauda won in his Ferrari in 1977 , but Lotus's star was in the ascendant and the 78 was as good as anything.
82- Rosberg's Williams I'd say was the penultimate time the best car didn't win . Not that there was a best car that year - so close. But nothing was better than Rosberg's Williams at 83 Monaco , as long as a bloke called Keke was driving !
86- Prost- the McLaren was no Williams ...
1970 - Lotus 72 was the best car , once they'd got it working. And it was so good that the last F1 race (not GP) it won was 4 years later .
1966/67 - the Brabham Repco didn't have as much power as many, but it worked .
1972- so evenly matched at the front - Stewart , Ickx , Fittipaldi in Tyrrell, Ferrari and Lotus (72!) .
Lauda won in his Ferrari in 1977 , but Lotus's star was in the ascendant and the 78 was as good as anything.
82- Rosberg's Williams I'd say was the penultimate time the best car didn't win . Not that there was a best car that year - so close. But nothing was better than Rosberg's Williams at 83 Monaco , as long as a bloke called Keke was driving !
86- Prost- the McLaren was no Williams ...
Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff