Official Italian Grand Prix Thread ***SPOILERS***
Discussion
Drive Blind said:
This will refocus the discussion of how you treat run off areas.
You leave nice smooth tarmac the drivers take the piss with track limits.
Anything else the drivers complain.
Is it time to introduce some sort of GPS system where the power is reduced/cut on a car that's off the track ?
Gravel works fine, the Track Director at Spa, will be putting that in for next yr..You leave nice smooth tarmac the drivers take the piss with track limits.
Anything else the drivers complain.
Is it time to introduce some sort of GPS system where the power is reduced/cut on a car that's off the track ?
That Verstoppen/Sausage curb, that’s a 250kph corner in F1 trim ... crazy...
Mr_Thyroid said:
Another tick for the halo.
I am not sure it has done anything there. Drivers were well protected before in upside down accidents by the structure under the airbox, the Halo was primarily introduced to help deflect external debris such as a tyre or piece of bodywork.Sadly Jules Bianchi would not have been saved by the halo, his injury was due to the deceleration involved in the impact in his crash.
Seems to me every time a car gets airborne now there is a slew of comments stating the halo saved all and sundry, it is simply not the case.
Drive Blind said:
This will refocus the discussion of how you treat run off areas.
You leave nice smooth tarmac the drivers take the piss with track limits.
Anything else the drivers complain.
Is it time to introduce some sort of GPS system where the power is reduced/cut on a car that's off the track ?
Or just put a gravel trap on the outside of the corner.You leave nice smooth tarmac the drivers take the piss with track limits.
Anything else the drivers complain.
Is it time to introduce some sort of GPS system where the power is reduced/cut on a car that's off the track ?
I very much doubt that curb will be there for the rest of the weekend.
Very difficult to see on that footage if he destroyed the kerb, if there was something lying on the kerb that acted like a ramp or if the kerb ripped the bottom off the car which would mean there might have been an issue with his ride height.
Horrific crash and given the circumstances so soon after Spa, motor racing dodged a bullet there especially given how fortunate the marshal's were as well. If it was definitely caused by the kerb then I would imagine the Monza authorities will have some questions to answer.
Horrific crash and given the circumstances so soon after Spa, motor racing dodged a bullet there especially given how fortunate the marshal's were as well. If it was definitely caused by the kerb then I would imagine the Monza authorities will have some questions to answer.
paulguitar said:
I am not sure it has done anything there. Drivers were well protected before in upside down accidents by the structure under the airbox, the Halo was primarily introduced to help deflect external debris such as a tyre or piece of bodywork.
Sadly Jules Bianchi would not have been saved by the halo, his injury was due to the deceleration involved in the impact in his crash.
Seems to me every time a car gets airborne now there is a slew of comments stating the halo saved all and sundry, it is simply not the case.
He landed upside down on the tyre wall - maybe you'd like to sit in the car while we recreate it without a halo.Sadly Jules Bianchi would not have been saved by the halo, his injury was due to the deceleration involved in the impact in his crash.
Seems to me every time a car gets airborne now there is a slew of comments stating the halo saved all and sundry, it is simply not the case.
Mr_Thyroid said:
paulguitar said:
I am not sure it has done anything there. Drivers were well protected before in upside down accidents by the structure under the airbox, the Halo was primarily introduced to help deflect external debris such as a tyre or piece of bodywork.
Sadly Jules Bianchi would not have been saved by the halo, his injury was due to the deceleration involved in the impact in his crash.
Seems to me every time a car gets airborne now there is a slew of comments stating the halo saved all and sundry, it is simply not the case.
He landed upside down on the tyre wall - maybe you'd like to sit in the car while we recreate it without a halo.Sadly Jules Bianchi would not have been saved by the halo, his injury was due to the deceleration involved in the impact in his crash.
Seems to me every time a car gets airborne now there is a slew of comments stating the halo saved all and sundry, it is simply not the case.
edit: I'm pretty certain I can guess what his answer will be.
37chevy said:
Mr_Thyroid said:
He landed upside down on the tyre wall - maybe you'd like to sit in the car while we recreate it without a halo.
I’m no halo far, but I agree, think it just saved his life given the cockpit opening hit the top of the tyre wallGassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff