F1 cancelled this year?

F1 cancelled this year?

Author
Discussion

Deesee

8,461 posts

84 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
jsf said:
Last race of 2019 scrutineer checks carried out

P1 and P2..
Well done you can use the internet and copy pasta.

How do think these FIA checks were done, with a tape measure and a dip stick and rule of eye..

Remember Seb burning up the mobile weighbridge.. you don’t do that unless your ‘ahem’ underweight’

Renault ‘emp’ the two cars in Bahrain last yr, so far underweight, can’t finish the race and be DQ..

Merc oil burning for 5 yrs, Ferrari using 115kg of fuel For the last 2 yrs..

No one can catch you unless you slip up or are grassed up.

Anyway said enough..

anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
Deesee said:
Well done you can use the internet and copy pasta.

How do think these FIA checks were done, with a tape measure and a dip stick and rule of eye..

Remember Seb burning up the mobile weighbridge.. you don’t do that unless your ‘ahem’ underweight’

Renault ‘emp’ the two cars in Bahrain last yr, so far underweight, can’t finish the race and be DQ..

Merc oil burning for 5 yrs, Ferrari using 115kg of fuel For the last 2 yrs..

No one can catch you unless you slip up or are grassed up.

Anyway said enough..
world class gibberish there.

Deesee

8,461 posts

84 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
jsf said:
Last race of 2019 scrutineer checks carried out

P1 and P2
Before the first free practice session:
An engine oil sample was taken from car number 27.
During the first free practice session:
The tyre starting pressures of all cars during P1 were checked.
The engine high rev limit bands were checked on all cars.
The fuel flow meter calibration checksum was checked on all cars.
The instantaneous fuel mass flow of all cars was checked.
The fuel temperature of all cars was checked.
The plenum temperature of all cars was checked.
After the first free practice session:
It was checked that all cars did not exceed 15000 rpm during the first free practice session.
The fuel pressure of all cars during the first free practice session was checked.
The logged pressure within the engine cooling system during the first free practice session was
checked on all cars.
The IVT code and calibration checksums were checked on all cars.
The ES state of charge on-track limits were checked on all cars.
The lap energy release and recovery limits were checked on all cars.
The MGU-K power limits were checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-K speed was checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-K torque was checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-H speed was checked on all cars.
A fuel sample was taken from car number 26.
Before the second free practice session:
An engine oil sample was taken from car number 88.
During the second free practice session:
The tyre starting pressures of all cars during P2 were checked.
The engine high rev limit bands were checked on all cars.
The fuel flow meter calibration checksum was checked on all cars.
The instantaneous fuel mass flow of all cars was checked.
The fuel temperature of all cars was checked.
The plenum temperature of all cars was checked.
After the second free practice session:
Car numbers 77 and 27 were weighed.
Car numbers 77 and 27 were checked for the following:
1) Bodywork around the front wheels
2) Front wing height and overhang
3) Rear wing height and overhang
4) Front and rear wing width
5) Rear wing configuration
6) Rear bodywork area
7) Rear winglet height
8) Stepped bottom
9) Overall height
10) Overall width
The profile of the in Article 3.3.1 of the 2019 Formula One Technical Regulations prescribed front
wing section was checked on car number 27.
The minimum distance between the adjacent rear wing sections at any longitudinal vertical plane was
checked on car numbers 77 and 27.
It was confirmed for car numbers 77 and 27 that any vertical cross section of bodywork normal to
the car centre line and situated in the volumes defined in Article 3.5.7 form one tangent continuous
curve on its external surface with a radius no less than 75mm.
The concave radius of sections of the two rear wing elements which are in contact with the external
air stream was checked on car numbers 77 and 27.
The front and rear brake air duct dimensions were checked on car numbers 77 and 27.
The IVT code and calibration checksums were checked on all cars.
The ES state of charge on-track limits were checked on all cars.
The lap energy release and recovery limits were checked on all cars.
The MGU-K power limits were checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-K speed was checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-K torque was checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-H speed was checked on all cars.
The tyres used by all drivers during the sessions today have been checked.
A fuel sample was taken from car number 03.
The results of fuel analyses show that the fuels were the same as ones, which had been approved
for use by the relevant competitors prior to the Event.
Further the density change of the fuel samples taken today was within the permitted limits.
The engine oil samples have been analysed by FTIR spectroscopy and viscometry.
The results of the FTIR analyses show that the sampled oils were consistent with reference engine
oil samples which had been approved for use by the relevant competitors prior to the Event.
All the above items were found to be in conformity with the 2019 FIA Formula One Technical
Regulations.

P3 and Qualy
Before the third free practice session:
An engine oil sample was taken from car number 26.
During the third free practice session:
The tyre starting pressures of all cars during P3 were checked.
The engine high rev limit bands were checked on all cars.
The fuel flow meter calibration checksum was checked on all cars.
The instantaneous fuel mass flow of all cars was checked.
The fuel temperature of all cars was checked.
The plenum temperature of all cars was checked.
The ES state of charge on-track limits were checked on all cars.
The lap energy release and recovery limits were checked on all cars.
The MGU-K power limits were checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-K speed was checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-K torque was checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-H speed was checked on all cars.
Before the qualifying practice session:
An engine oil sample was taken from car numbers 08 and 18.
The thickness of the brake discs of all cars taking part in the qualifying session was checked.
During the qualifying practice session:
Car numbers 44, 20, 04, 11, 07, 26, 10 and 88 were weighed.
The weight distribution was checked on car numbers 44, 20, 04, 11, 07, 26, 10 and 88.
The tyre starting pressures of all cars during the qualifying sessions were checked.
Fuel samples were taken from car numbers 11 and 88.
After the qualifying practice session:
Car numbers 44, 77, 05, 16, 33, 23, 03, 27, 55 and 04 were weighed.
Car numbers 44, 77, 05, 16, 33, 23, 03, 27, 55 and 04 were checked for the following:
1) Bodywork around the front wheels
2) Front wing height and overhang
3) Rear wing height and overhang
4) Front and rear wing width
5) Rear wing configuration
6) Rear bodywork area
7) Rear winglet height
8) Stepped bottom
9) Diffuser height
10) Diffuser width
11) Overall height
12) Overall width
The chassis identification transponders have been confirmed for car numbers 44, 77, 05, 16, 33,
23, 03, 27, 55 and 04.
The profile of the prescribed front wing section in Article 3.3.1 of the 2019 Formula One Technical
Regulations was checked on car numbers 44, 77, 05, 16, 33, 23, 03, 27, 55 and 04.
The minimum distance between the adjacent rear wing sections at any longitudinal vertical plane was
checked on car numbers 44, 77, 05, 16, 33, 23, 03, 27, 55 and 04.
It was confirmed for car numbers 44, 77, 05, 16, 33, 23, 03, 27, 55 and 04 that any vertical cross
section of bodywork normal to the car centre line and situated in the volumes defined in Article 3.5.7
form one tangent continuous curve on its external surface with a radius no less than 75mm.
The concave radius of sections of the two rear wing elements which are in contact with the external
air stream was checked on car numbers 44, 77, 05, 16, 33, 23, 03, 27, 55 and 04.
The front and rear brake air duct dimensions were checked on car numbers 44, 77, 05, 16, 33, 23,
03, 27, 55 and 04.
The inclination, the diameter and the position of the last 150mm of the exhaust tailpipes were
checked on car numbers 44, 77, 05, 16, 33, 23, 03, 27, 55 and 04.
A horizontal rear wing deflection test was carried out on car numbers 44, 16 and 33.
The uppermost rear wing element adjustable positions were checked on car numbers 44, 77, 05, 16,
33, 23, 03, 27, 55 and 04.
The engine high rev limit bands were checked on all cars.
The plenum temperature was checked on all cars.
The IVT code and calibration checksums were checked on all cars.
The IVT temperatures were checked on all cars.
The ES state of charge on-track limits were checked on all cars.
The lap energy release and recovery limits were checked on all cars.
The MGU-K power limits were checked on car all cars.
The maximum MGU-K speed was checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-K torque was checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-H speed was checked on all cars.
The TAG320 locked status was checked on all cars.
The session type has been confirmed for all cars.
Chassis FIA checksum was checked on all cars taking part in the qualifying sessions.
Torque sensor software version checks have been carried out on all cars.
Torque sensor calibration checks have been carried out on all cars.
The torque coordinator demands were checked on all cars.
The torque control was checked on all cars.
The rear brakes pressure control was checked on all cars.
Gear shift data checks have been carried out for car numbers 05, 16 and 55.
It was checked that all cars did not exceed 15000 rpm during the qualifying practice session.
The fuel pressure of all cars during the qualifying session was checked.
The logged pressure within the engine cooling system during the qualifying session was checked on
all cars.
The tyres used by all drivers during the sessions today have been checked.
Fuel flow meter calibration checksums were checked on all cars.
The instantaneous fuel mass flow of all cars was checked.
The fuel temperature of all cars was checked.
Fuel samples were taken from car numbers 16 and 55.
All the fuel samples have been checked for density and analysed by gas chromatography.
The results of fuel analyses show that the fuels were the same as ones, which had been approved
for use by the relevant competitors prior to the Event.
Further the density change of the fuel samples taken today was within the permitted limits.
An engine oil sample was taken from car number 16.
The engine oil samples have been analysed by FTIR spectroscopy and viscometry.
The results of the FTIR analyses show that the sampled oils were consistent with reference engine
oil samples which had been approved for use by the relevant competitors prior to the Event.
The following software versions have been used by the teams during the qualifying sessions:
Team FIA Standard ECU
system version
Mercedes AMG Petronas Motorsport SR1119
Scuderia Ferrari Mission Winnow SR1118
Aston Martin Red Bull Racing SR1119
Renault F1 Team SR1118
Haas F1 Team SR1118
McLaren F1 Team SR1119
SportPesa Racing Point F1 Team SR1119
Alfa Romeo Racing SR1118
Red Bull Toro Rosso Honda SR1119
ROKiT Williams Racing SR1119
All the above items were found to be in conformity with the 2019 FIA Formula One Technical
Regulations.

Race
Before the race:
The following parts have been replaced today after 16:17 and before the start of the race:
McLaren Renault:
Car 55: Seat belt buckle
A symmetric and an asymmetric front wing deflection test was carried out on car numbers 44, 16 and
33.
A fuel sample was taken from car numbers 23, 08 and 99 and analysed during the race.
An engine oil sample was taken from car number 33 and 99.
On the grid it was checked that all cars had fitted their tyres when the “3-Minutes” signal was given.
On the grid it was checked that the top ten cars had fitted the tyres which they had used when doing
their fastest lap in Q2.
On the grid the temperature of the LHS and RHS front and rear tyre was checked on car number 26.
On the grid the minimum tyre starting pressure of the LHS and RHS front and rear tyre was checked
on all cars.
After the race:
The following cars were weighed:
Number Car Driver
44 Mercedes Lewis Hamilton
77 Mercedes Valtteri Bottas
05 Ferrari Sebastian Vettel
16 Ferrari Charles Leclerc
33 RBR Honda Max Verstappen
23 RBR Honda Alexander Albon
03 Renault Daniel Ricciardo
20 Haas Ferrari Kevin Magnussen
55 McLaren Renault Carlos Sainz
04 McLaren Renault Lando Norris
11 Racing Point Mercedes Sergio Perez
07 Alfa Romeo Ferrari Kimi Räikkönen
26 Toro Rosso Honda Daniil Kvyat
63 Williams Mercedes George Russell
The steering wheel of all classified cars has been checked.
Car numbers 11 and 26 were checked for the following:
1) Bodywork around the front wheels
2) Front wing height and overhang
3) Rear wing height and overhang
4) Front and rear wing width
5) Rear wing configuration
6) Rear bodywork area
7) Rear winglet height
8) Skidblock thickness
9) Stepped bottom
10) Diffuser height
11) Diffuser area
12) Overall height
13) Overall width
The profile of the in Article 3.3.1 of the 2019 Formula One Technical Regulations prescribed front
wing section was checked on car numbers 11 and 26.
The minimum distance between the adjacent rear wing sections at any longitudinal vertical plane was
checked on car numbers 11 and 26.
It was confirmed for car numbers 11 and 26 that any vertical cross section of bodywork normal to
the car centre line and situated in the volumes defined in Article 3.5.7 form one tangent continuous
curve on its external surface with a radius no less than 75mm.
The concave radius of sections of the two rear wing elements which are in contact with the external
air stream was checked on car numbers 11 and 26.
The front and rear brake air duct dimensions were checked on car numbers 11 and 26.
The engine high rev limit bands were checked on all cars.
The plenum temperature was checked on all cars.
The IVT code and calibration checksums were checked on all cars.
The IVT temperatures were checked on all cars.
The ES state of charge on-track limits were checked on all cars.
The lap energy release and recovery limits were checked on all cars.
The MGU-K power limits were checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-K speed was checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-K torque was checked on all cars.
The maximum MGU-H speed was checked on all cars.
The TAG320 locked status was checked on all cars.
The session type has been confirmed for all cars.
Chassis FIA checksum was checked on all cars taking part in the race.
The torque coordinator demands were checked on all cars.
The torque control was checked on all cars.
The rear brakes pressure control was checked on all cars.
The brake temperature warnings were checked on all cars.
The race start data of all cars have been checked.
Single clutch paddle use for the race start has been checked on all cars.
The MGU-K use at the race start was checked on all cars.
It was checked on all cars that the ES was not charged while the car was stationary in the pits.
It was checked that no car exceeded 80 km/h when leaving the formation grid prior to the start of the
race.
It was verified on all cars that the MD5 checksum of the PCU8 (dash board display) used on the car
matched the configuration lodged with the FiA prior to the qualifying session.
Fuel flow meter calibration checksums were checked on all cars.
The instantaneous fuel mass flow of all cars was checked.
The fuel temperature of all cars was checked.
The total fuel mass consumed by all cars during the race was checked.
A fuel sample was taken from car number 44.
The fuel samples have been checked for density and analysed by gas chromatography.
The results of all the fuel analyses show that the fuels were the same as ones, which had been
approved for use by the relevant competitors prior to the Event.
Further the density change of the fuel samples taken today was within the permitted limits.
An engine oil sample was taken from car number 44.
The engine oil samples have been analysed by FTIR spectroscopy and viscometry.
The results of the FTIR analyses show that the sampled oils were consistent with reference engine
oil samples which had been approved for use by the relevant competitors prior to the Event.
All car weights and the items checked were found to be in conformity with the 2019 FIA Formula One
Technical Regulations.
So what’s your point??

Deesee

8,461 posts

84 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
jsf said:
world class gibberish there.
Thanks, any more copy pasta jsf???


anonymous-user

55 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
Deesee said:
Thanks, any more copy pasta jsf???
Nope, i think the point has been made about how many scrutineering checks are done during a GP. It's not all self assessment as suggested.

Deesee

8,461 posts

84 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
jsf said:
Deesee said:
Thanks, any more copy pasta jsf???
Nope, i think the point has been made about how many scrutineering checks are done during a GP. It's not all self assessment as suggested.
Of course there are tests, although most of what are recorded are by sensors, or when the team wheels them in and self certificates.. which is the majority of time.

On your basis Jo Bauer has a lot of tests (50+ on every car between sessions)..

Nickp82

3,194 posts

94 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Too late... I'm already working on two shows that normally have live audiences that are looking in to ways of including home viewer footage and reactions. It's the obvious, and awkward solution to a socially distanced world.

Personally I hate the idea but I can well imagine FOM looking to do something similar for F1.
Fantastic idea, just imagine if you had, say, Rylan and Stacey Solomon reacting to the race events, how good would that be!

craigjm

17,962 posts

201 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
Deesee said:
So what’s your point??
Did you really have to quote it just to make everything so much longer?

TheDeuce

21,737 posts

67 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
Nickp82 said:
TheDeuce said:
Too late... I'm already working on two shows that normally have live audiences that are looking in to ways of including home viewer footage and reactions. It's the obvious, and awkward solution to a socially distanced world.

Personally I hate the idea but I can well imagine FOM looking to do something similar for F1.
Fantastic idea, just imagine if you had, say, Rylan and Stacey Solomon reacting to the race events, how good would that be!
For me I'd hate it, so far as F1 goes. But many in the industry are currently looking for creative ways to inject live response back in to TV so it's entirely possible FOM will sign off on some sort of weird plan. Hopefully they'll do it in a decent way, if they do it at all - perhaps an ex driver or two watching remotely might be acceptable!


Nickp82

3,194 posts

94 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
Actually now you mention it, Fernando Alonso would be a great candidate for that I reckon smile

TheDeuce

21,737 posts

67 months

Sunday 7th June 2020
quotequote all
Nickp82 said:
Actually now you mention it, Fernando Alonso would be a great candidate for that I reckon smile
Oh god.. Not him again. I think you'll struggle to find anyone influential in the sport today that welcomes his opinion, especially if broadcast live.

shirt

22,618 posts

202 months

Monday 8th June 2020
quotequote all
Deesee said:
shirt said:
Deesee said:
By self as been the rule the last few yrs, teams use the weighbridge, and any seals that need ‘reviewing’ can be done by distance.
since when? removing the scrutineers would easily enable teams to break parc ferme conditions as well as a whole host of other rules as and when they like.
FIA officials will still be in the FIA garage, most of the checks are done before they get there.

Most checks now are self served and be under/over weight then it’s your problem, they all have a time slot to check the weight of the car.

The FIA have been more like ‘referee’ for the last few years, rather than last bastain of scrutiny.

In the (hopefully) temporary environment there’s no room to break Parc Ferme, with hours etc, if anything it will become more self policing.
Parc ferme conditions include things like being unable to make any changes to the car, so things like suspension and aero settings between quali and the race (Very quick and easy to change) as well as physical items. It’s things like this I was thinking of not the nth letter of the regs. There’s no way car set-up would be self policed if either team or driver demanded it.

So yes, referee stuff, but would mean playing without one for the season.

NRS

22,197 posts

202 months

Monday 8th June 2020
quotequote all
Donbot said:
Craigyp79 said:
No, instead they'll be continually cutting away to action shots of online watch parties..
DON'T GIVE THEM IDEAS!
laugh

I wonder if Hamilton will still be thanking the best fans in the world at each race too? biggrin

Deesee

8,461 posts

84 months

Monday 8th June 2020
quotequote all
shirt said:
Deesee said:
shirt said:
Deesee said:
By self as been the rule the last few yrs, teams use the weighbridge, and any seals that need ‘reviewing’ can be done by distance.
since when? removing the scrutineers would easily enable teams to break parc ferme conditions as well as a whole host of other rules as and when they like.
FIA officials will still be in the FIA garage, most of the checks are done before they get there.

Most checks now are self served and be under/over weight then it’s your problem, they all have a time slot to check the weight of the car.

The FIA have been more like ‘referee’ for the last few years, rather than last bastain of scrutiny.

In the (hopefully) temporary environment there’s no room to break Parc Ferme, with hours etc, if anything it will become more self policing.
Parc ferme conditions include things like being unable to make any changes to the car, so things like suspension and aero settings between quali and the race (Very quick and easy to change) as well as physical items. It’s things like this I was thinking of not the nth letter of the regs. There’s no way car set-up would be self policed if either team or driver demanded it.

So yes, referee stuff, but would mean playing without one for the season.
I seem to remember last year (or the yr before), that some one cracked a rear wing in Quali and it was found on the Sunday morning, and they did not have an exact spare, so the penalty was a pit lane start. I can only assume that they will plaster the car parts with unique holographed/QR no tamper stickers for parc ferme, as thing can look and measure the same but not be.

It's quite telling that from next year they have raised the car minimum weight for the sole reason of additional sensors, theres a conscious awareness that teams are somewhat bending the rules.

Exige77

6,518 posts

192 months

Monday 8th June 2020
quotequote all
Deesee said:
I seem to remember last year (or the yr before), that some one cracked a rear wing in Quali and it was found on the Sunday morning, and they did not have an exact spare, so the penalty was a pit lane start. I can only assume that they will plaster the car parts with unique holographed/QR no tamper stickers for parc ferme, as thing can look and measure the same but not be.

It's quite telling that from next year they have raised the car minimum weight for the sole reason of additional sensors, theres a conscious awareness that teams are somewhat bending the rules.
The teams have always bent the rules.

They do/did what ever they can get away with.

The more sensors or test equipment available to the scrutineers, the more bending the rules will be stopped.

Motorsport has always been full of cheating, even in Cadet Karts. It’s a cat and mouse game between competitors and the sport’s administrators.

sparta6

3,699 posts

101 months

Monday 8th June 2020
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
Nickp82 said:
Actually now you mention it, Fernando Alonso would be a great candidate for that I reckon smile
Oh god.. Not him again. I think you'll struggle to find anyone influential in the sport today that welcomes his opinion, especially if broadcast live.
Alonso is a relative lightweight.

Piers Morgan keeps getting his opinions broadcast, on every single subject under the sun biggrin

sparta6

3,699 posts

101 months

Monday 8th June 2020
quotequote all
Exige77 said:
The teams have always bent the rules.

They do/did what ever they can get away with.

The more sensors or test equipment available to the scrutineers, the more bending the rules will be stopped.

Motorsport has always been full of cheating, even in Cadet Karts. It’s a cat and mouse game between competitors and the sport’s administrators.
Unfortunately this is correct.

Little wonder most people prefer the straight forward rules of football.

TheDeuce

21,737 posts

67 months

Monday 8th June 2020
quotequote all
sparta6 said:
TheDeuce said:
Nickp82 said:
Actually now you mention it, Fernando Alonso would be a great candidate for that I reckon smile
Oh god.. Not him again. I think you'll struggle to find anyone influential in the sport today that welcomes his opinion, especially if broadcast live.
Alonso is a relative lightweight.

Piers Morgan keeps getting his opinions broadcast, on every single subject under the sun biggrin
Those paying Morgan aren't the ones he has opinions about though wink

That's the issue with Alonso. Pay him to drive your car, he'll announce to the globe that its a POS. Also the engine is a POS - and it's all the fault of the team, who didn't listen to him and don't know what they're doing. Popular guy....!

sparta6

3,699 posts

101 months

Monday 8th June 2020
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
sparta6 said:
TheDeuce said:
Nickp82 said:
Actually now you mention it, Fernando Alonso would be a great candidate for that I reckon smile
Oh god.. Not him again. I think you'll struggle to find anyone influential in the sport today that welcomes his opinion, especially if broadcast live.
Alonso is a relative lightweight.

Piers Morgan keeps getting his opinions broadcast, on every single subject under the sun biggrin
Those paying Morgan aren't the ones he has opinions about though wink

That's the issue with Alonso. Pay him to drive your car, he'll announce to the globe that its a POS. Also the engine is a POS - and it's all the fault of the team, who didn't listen to him and don't know what they're doing. Popular guy....!
Indeed, Morgan is a deft hand at the money game, including when he was at The Mirror wink

Alonso probably had a point on the engine, but airing it in such a way is a big no-no.
Prost was sacked by Ferrari for a similar public outburst. He probably didn't fancy 5 years trying to develop that dog into a contender biggrin


shirt

22,618 posts

202 months

Tuesday 9th June 2020
quotequote all
Deesee said:
I seem to remember last year (or the yr before), that some one cracked a rear wing in Quali and it was found on the Sunday morning, and they did not have an exact spare, so the penalty was a pit lane start. I can only assume that they will plaster the car parts with unique holographed/QR no tamper stickers for parc ferme, as thing can look and measure the same but not be.

It's quite telling that from next year they have raised the car minimum weight for the sole reason of additional sensors, theres a conscious awareness that teams are somewhat bending the rules.
They didn’t have an exact spare or thought running a different spec was worth the pitlane start? I don’t buy the story as presented, no way that damage would go undetected for a start - either visually or via sensor data. The only way it wouldn't be an exact spare was if it was a development part.

For a very long time now, the car must start the race with the exact same setup as it finished quali. Putting extra stickers on parts with adjustable elements does nothing to police that. It’s absolutely fundamental to the rules as they stand to have garage scrutineers. Unless the rules are revised/waived this season there’s no way around it.

Personally I think the main issue this season will be lower teams running out of parts as trips into the barriers take their toll. Looking at you, Haas drivers!

NB - extra sensor data is meaningless if no one checks it, which they won’t unless the competition dobs the ‘rule bending’ team in accompanied by a best guess at what’s going on and what the FIA should look for.