The Official F1 2023 silly season *contains speculation*
Discussion
mattdavies said:
entropy said:
spikyone said:
I'm not denying he's a very fast driver, the discussion was about the suggestion that he seems like a decent guy.
The discussion is also about why teams are endeared to Alonso. First and foremost he's a top class driver and teams are wiling to gamble to put up with the aggro. He is not the first driver nor sportsperson to have employers bend over backwards.Merc allowed Hamilton's bling lifestyle without complaint despite the critics;
LH is allowed to live his lifestyle how he wants away from the race track not in team clothing as long as it doesnt affect his performance, he also doesnt harshly critise the team.
Anyway, as above, Aston know exactly what they are getting with a 2xWDC with a history of getting the best out of cars - they've done their risk assessment and reckon FA is worth the "trouble".
Fernando, great guy, race pace is still first class, with Hamilton most complete driver on the grid. Winner of 2x WDC. Could have been 5. Highly decorated driver with 30+ wins in an era of a tyre war and refuelling.
Alonso, one man wrecking machine, takes no prisoners with team principles or delegates. Team mates are expendable canon fodder. Lost 3 championships to questionable decisions (his). Was out of F1 for 3 yrs and not missed.
Alonso, one man wrecking machine, takes no prisoners with team principles or delegates. Team mates are expendable canon fodder. Lost 3 championships to questionable decisions (his). Was out of F1 for 3 yrs and not missed.
Deesee said:
Fernando, great guy, race pace is still first class, with Hamilton most complete driver on the grid. Winner of 2x WDC. Could have been 5. Highly decorated driver with 30+ wins in an era of a tyre war and refuelling.
Alonso, one man wrecking machine, takes no prisoners with team principles or delegates. Team mates are expendable canon fodder. Lost 3 championships to questionable decisions (his). Was out of F1 for 3 yrs and not missed.
I like the distinction there...Alonso, one man wrecking machine, takes no prisoners with team principles or delegates. Team mates are expendable canon fodder. Lost 3 championships to questionable decisions (his). Was out of F1 for 3 yrs and not missed.
It's interesting when you discuss Fernando with his fans, they rhapsodise about his strategic sense, and how deeply he engages with / dictates to the team on race strategy.
Except for the 28th of September 2008 of course, inexplicably Alonso couldn't be bothered to get involved on strategy in the slightest on that day.....
blackmme said:
I like the distinction there...
It's interesting when you discuss Fernando with his fans, they rhapsodise about his strategic sense, and how deeply he engages with / dictates to the team on race strategy.
Except for the 28th of September 2008 of course, inexplicably Alonso couldn't be bothered to get involved on strategy in the slightest on that day.....
Nicely articulated sir. It's interesting when you discuss Fernando with his fans, they rhapsodise about his strategic sense, and how deeply he engages with / dictates to the team on race strategy.
Except for the 28th of September 2008 of course, inexplicably Alonso couldn't be bothered to get involved on strategy in the slightest on that day.....
carl_w said:
Giovinazzi to drive the Haas in FP1 for the Italian and US GPs. Potential Haas signing for next year?
He's the official reserve driver for Ferrari including Alfa and Haas. So just doing what Kubica has done this year 3 times as Alfa's reserve driver.Last in the championship with zero points in Formula E won't get you an F1 drive.
the-norseman said:
Wonder if Ferrari are going to let Mick do a FP1 in their car?
Ferrari have Mick, Gio and Robert S as test drivers.
Ferrari are in a battle to claw their way back in the title race. Why waste a session on the wrong driver? Its the sort of thing uncle ralph would suggest.Ferrari have Mick, Gio and Robert S as test drivers.
Then again its ferrari so another strategic blunder?
The mandatory FP1 ‘young driver’ is supposed to have at least 25 super licence points, and fewer than two GP starts.
https://www.gpblog.com/en/news/104961/young-driver...
So the likes of Kubica, Schumacher and Giovinazzi are too experienced to be eligible, although the teams can of course run them in FP1 sessions at their discretion, presumably if the cheque is big enough.
https://www.gpblog.com/en/news/104961/young-driver...
So the likes of Kubica, Schumacher and Giovinazzi are too experienced to be eligible, although the teams can of course run them in FP1 sessions at their discretion, presumably if the cheque is big enough.
Fundoreen said:
Ferrari are in a battle to claw their way back in the title race. Why waste a session on the wrong driver? Its the sort of thing uncle ralph would suggest.
Then again its ferrari so another strategic blunder?
its compulsory to run a young driver, but as per the post below think Robert S will be the one they run. Then again its ferrari so another strategic blunder?
Merc Twitter Admin (personal account).. posting this..
https://twitter.com/CosmicDanzo/status/15613974321...
Id like to see it..
https://twitter.com/CosmicDanzo/status/15613974321...
Id like to see it..
Deesee said:
Merc Twitter Admin (personal account).. posting this..
https://twitter.com/CosmicDanzo/status/15613974321...
Id like to see it..
Screenshot it as it wont show me what the tweet is.https://twitter.com/CosmicDanzo/status/15613974321...
Id like to see it..
Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff