Official 2024 Chinese Grand Prix Thread ***SPOILERS***

Official 2024 Chinese Grand Prix Thread ***SPOILERS***

Poll: Official 2024 Chinese Grand Prix Thread ***SPOILERS***

Total Members Polled: 92

Perez: 32%
Leclerc: 9%
Sainz: 35%
Russell: 1%
Hamilton: 8%
Norris: 14%
Piastri: 1%
Alonso: 1%
Author
Discussion

TheDeuce

21,703 posts

67 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
BrettMRC said:
DRS would be much more interesting if it was limited to a set number of activations per race, and can be used in any DRS zone regardless of current distance to the next nearest car.

I think the strategy implications would be interesting with that!
That's effectively what push to pass could achieve. There could be any number ways a driver could trigger/earn additional deployable power, and number of times or how much extra power they can use in a lap or race could be set within the rules too.

For example, they could set it up so the longer you can stay within 1 second of the car in front, the more 'boost' power can be generated - which would force close driving for a few laps ahead of eventually making a clean pass, not dissimilar to a DRS pass but it could happen anywhere on the circuit that the driver chooses. It would also be 'earned' more than a DRS pass due to the time taken to generate the required boost.

It would also avoid the current DRS re-pass nonsense, as the car that had been passed wouldn't be able to stay within a second of the car that passed it for long enough to build up enough boost to re-pass, because they car that passed it was fundamentally faster and will be gone down the road soon enough.

I'm still not sure if I like anything artificial tbh, but at a practical level an electric boost push to pass system can do all that DRS currently does but offers more flexibility with regard to how it's used and what the rules can demand - so it's a better potential solution, an evolution.

g4ry13

17,006 posts

256 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
romft123 said:
Max was 3 seconds ahead of second place after 4 laps, 6 seconds ahead after 7. Thats just incredible. Just HTF can anyone get near that
They can't. That Red Bull is 1-2 seconds a lap faster than the best of the rest.

We are not going to see any racing until 2026, assuming that temas diverge and we don't simply find one has utterly nailed it again....
We might see some racing towards the end of next season. Then the gap will become huge again the following season with the reg changes. Much like what happened in 2021 when Max won the first championship.

From a spectator perspective, they should have kept the cars as they were in 2021 and had another season.

Bo_apex

2,568 posts

219 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
g4ry13 said:
Jasandjules said:
romft123 said:
Max was 3 seconds ahead of second place after 4 laps, 6 seconds ahead after 7. Thats just incredible. Just HTF can anyone get near that
They can't. That Red Bull is 1-2 seconds a lap faster than the best of the rest.

We are not going to see any racing until 2026, assuming that temas diverge and we don't simply find one has utterly nailed it again....
We might see some racing towards the end of next season. Then the gap will become huge again the following season with the reg changes. Much like what happened in 2021 when Max won the first championship.

From a spectator perspective, they should have kept the cars as they were in 2021 and had another season.
Max is proving to be Schumacher-esq in extracting the maximum from his car with metronomic style.

Sainz jumping into the second Red Bull would spice things up but they've been team mates before and Max had the measure of Carlos.

P2 onwards is pretty tight this season.

paulguitar

23,507 posts

114 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Bo_apex said:
Max is proving to be Schumacher-esq in extracting the maximum from his car with metronomic style.

Sainz jumping into the second Red Bull would spice things up but they've been team mates before and Max had the measure of Carlos.

P2 onwards is pretty tight this season.
Yes, it's currently quite similar to the Schumacher dominance seasons. Significant car advantage and subservient number two journeyman in the second car.

Not sure whether the Verstappen and the Sainz families can happily exist in the same team. Punchy Jos didn't like having them around very much last time. They'd be a good pairing if they could work together, Carlos doesn't quite have the ultimate pace of MV but would be a solid and reliable backup, plus perhaps occasionally we might even get a bit of racing, if Red Bull would let them do it.



g4ry13

17,006 posts

256 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Bo_apex said:
g4ry13 said:
Jasandjules said:
romft123 said:
Max was 3 seconds ahead of second place after 4 laps, 6 seconds ahead after 7. Thats just incredible. Just HTF can anyone get near that
They can't. That Red Bull is 1-2 seconds a lap faster than the best of the rest.

We are not going to see any racing until 2026, assuming that temas diverge and we don't simply find one has utterly nailed it again....
We might see some racing towards the end of next season. Then the gap will become huge again the following season with the reg changes. Much like what happened in 2021 when Max won the first championship.

From a spectator perspective, they should have kept the cars as they were in 2021 and had another season.
Max is proving to be Schumacher-esq in extracting the maximum from his car with metronomic style.

Sainz jumping into the second Red Bull would spice things up but they've been team mates before and Max had the measure of Carlos.

P2 onwards is pretty tight this season.
It's been 9 years since they were teammates. Both drivers have obviously developed in that timeframe.

Maybe Carlos has improved significantly to his performance in 2015 and the gap would now be closer between the two.

Either way, Carlos isn't going to Red Bull.

rdjohn

6,188 posts

196 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
g4ry13 said:
We might see some racing towards the end of next season. Then the gap will become huge again the following season with the reg changes. Much like what happened in 2021 when Max won the first championship.

From a spectator perspective, they should have kept the cars as they were in 2021 and had another season.
The YouTube video earlier showed just how complex the ICE, GEN and BAT are going to be, couple that with variable aero rather than DRS and these cars are likely to be monsters to drive and return to back-markers being lapped several time.

If drivers can actually manage them, it should reward skilled drivers, rather than the best design team.

heebeegeetee

28,776 posts

249 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
HardtopManual said:
heebeegeetee said:
I feel quite sad watching that. In the modern era, those laps-long battles are replaced with a simple DRS pass at the end of a straight.

Then there's the noise.
The problem is, that video is a perfect example of why they came up with DRS in the first place. So that the battle could eventually have a conclusion. Before DRS battles like in that video did used to drag on, and on, and on... And the faster driver in the faster car often couldn't pass because they didnt have enough of a speed differential to get it done - so often the slower car and/or driver would finish the race ahead as a result. Is that better/worse than DRS? It's a debateable imo, and at the time it was very much the fact that people were grumbling 'these cars can't pass one another'...

ETA: I agree about the noise cloud9
But "back then" does seem a lot more like proper racing.

thegreenhell

15,403 posts

220 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
rdjohn said:
g4ry13 said:
We might see some racing towards the end of next season. Then the gap will become huge again the following season with the reg changes. Much like what happened in 2021 when Max won the first championship.

From a spectator perspective, they should have kept the cars as they were in 2021 and had another season.
The YouTube video earlier showed just how complex the ICE, GEN and BAT are going to be, couple that with variable aero rather than DRS and these cars are likely to be monsters to drive and return to back-markers being lapped several time.

If drivers can actually manage them, it should reward skilled drivers, rather than the best design team.
By the sounds of it, it will reward skilled button pushers who have the best team of engineers behind them telling them which buttons to push.

Personally I'd like to see less complexity, not more. Every layer of technology seems to take something away from the racing, to be replaced by some sticking plaster gimmick when people complain that the racing is more boring than ever.

vaud

50,597 posts

156 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
thegreenhell said:
By the sounds of it, it will reward skilled button pushers who have the best team of engineers behind them telling them which buttons to push.

Personally I'd like to see less complexity, not more. Every layer of technology seems to take something away from the racing, to be replaced by some sticking plaster gimmick when people complain that the racing is more boring than ever.
The problem is two fold:

1) You can't put the genie back in the bottle
2) If you clip F1 speeds and pace then you need to neuter F2,F3, etc as F1 has to be the fastest.

Personally:

1) even less aero
2) gearboxes with clutches (I'd allow for an interlock that prevents a catastrophic downshift) but put some more variables back to the driver. Would probably mean a drop to 6 speed boxes and then allow them to pick ratios per track
3) tyre war? maybe
4) refuelling - part of me says yes, part no...

isaldiri

18,605 posts

169 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
g4ry13 said:
romft123 said:
Max was 3 seconds ahead of second place after 4 laps, 6 seconds ahead after 7. Thats just incredible. Just HTF can anyone get near that
When safety car period came to an end he was pulling about a second gap within the first sector.
While Verstappen clearly was the fastest driver around, the RB (in his hands) didn't have a second plus a lap gap over the next fastest car.

The early gap that Verstappen opened up was due to Alonso holding up Perez then Norris, the latter 2 being fairly evenly matched in pace actually over the race with Perez being around 0.5s a lap slower than his team-mate (a tad embarassing that but it wasn't the largest pace gap between team-mates in the race either).

Verstappen was mostly around 0.4-0.5s a lap faster (probably the lower end of that in the 2nd stint and the higher end in the first) over Norris once he was past Alonso and later after the pit stops where their pace would have been broadly comparable.

Edited by isaldiri on Monday 22 April 17:38

jm doc

2,791 posts

233 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
romft123 said:
Max was 3 seconds ahead of second place after 4 laps, 6 seconds ahead after 7. Thats just incredible. Just HTF can anyone get near that
They can't. That Red Bull is 1-2 seconds a lap faster than the best of the rest.

We are not going to see any racing until 2026, assuming that temas diverge and we don't simply find one has utterly nailed it again....
But does anyone really believe Max is 1-2 seconds a lap faster than Perez?

romft123

315 posts

5 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
jm doc said:
Jasandjules said:
romft123 said:
Max was 3 seconds ahead of second place after 4 laps, 6 seconds ahead after 7. Thats just incredible. Just HTF can anyone get near that
They can't. That Red Bull is 1-2 seconds a lap faster than the best of the rest.

We are not going to see any racing until 2026, assuming that temas diverge and we don't simply find one has utterly nailed it again....
But does anyone really believe Max is 1-2 seconds a lap faster than Perez?
Did you watch the race yesterday?

thegreenhell

15,403 posts

220 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
vaud said:
The problem is two fold:

1) You can't put the genie back in the bottle
2) If you clip F1 speeds and pace then you need to neuter F2,F3, etc as F1 has to be the fastest.

Personally:

1) even less aero
2) gearboxes with clutches (I'd allow for an interlock that prevents a catastrophic downshift) but put some more variables back to the driver. Would probably mean a drop to 6 speed boxes and then allow them to pick ratios per track
3) tyre war? maybe
4) refuelling - part of me says yes, part no...
They don't need to make them slower, just less complex. The current cars aren't actually any faster than any from the last 20 or so years because the regulations always artificially peg them back to that sort of level, and that will likely continue forevermore due to the circuits they race on and the frailty of the human bodies that have to pilot the cars.

The next generation cars look to be even more of a techno wkfest than the current ones, which will place even more importance on the design and engineering teams and less on the drivers. There will simply be more needless systems like active aero and all the hybrid battery management that need to be optimised, and I can easily see another 2014 or 2022 scenario where one team aces it and others fk it up. They will all then spend the next five or six years trying to catch up within the limited budget and development they are allowed now until the rules all change again and somebody else takes their turn to dominate for a while.

Forester1965

1,535 posts

4 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
It's the artificial juxtaposition of having to electrify the cars to placate the manufacturers whilst not going full electric because the technology isn't there to drive a GP distance and the silence would be wk.

In which case let's just have ICE and drop the pretence.

paulguitar

23,507 posts

114 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
romft123 said:
Did you watch the race yesterday?
The average quali gap between Verstappen and Perez is, what, about 0.3ish?



TheDeuce

21,703 posts

67 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
It's the artificial juxtaposition of having to electrify the cars to placate the manufacturers whilst not going full electric because the technology isn't there to drive a GP distance and the silence would be wk.

In which case let's just have ICE and drop the pretence.
It's very clear that F1 has begun and is continuing the lengthy process of electrifying the cars, the end goal will certainly be fully electric.

That can't happen yet due to battery technology, but they're already increasing the electric side considerably from 2026 onwards - and with scope for more.

Rapid recharging is also an area of fast development (in the transport world at large, not in F1) but will probably soon enough make it possible to recharge a racing cars battery in seconds, so not dissimilar to 're-fuelling'. F1 will probably remain around a decade behind road car powertrains, so they won't be fully electric for quite some time. It's bound to happen though.


paulguitar

23,507 posts

114 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
TheDeuce said:
It's very clear that F1 has begun and is continuing the lengthy process of electrifying the cars, the end goal will certainly be fully electric.

That can't happen yet due to battery technology, but they're already increasing the electric side considerably from 2026 onwards - and with scope for more.

Rapid recharging is also an area of fast development (in the transport world at large, not in F1) but will probably soon enough make it possible to recharge a racing cars battery in seconds, so not dissimilar to 're-fuelling'. F1 will probably remain around a decade behind road car powertrains, so they won't be fully electric for quite some time. It's bound to happen though.
I hope I'm dead by then.



TheDeuce

21,703 posts

67 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
TheDeuce said:
It's very clear that F1 has begun and is continuing the lengthy process of electrifying the cars, the end goal will certainly be fully electric.

That can't happen yet due to battery technology, but they're already increasing the electric side considerably from 2026 onwards - and with scope for more.

Rapid recharging is also an area of fast development (in the transport world at large, not in F1) but will probably soon enough make it possible to recharge a racing cars battery in seconds, so not dissimilar to 're-fuelling'. F1 will probably remain around a decade behind road car powertrains, so they won't be fully electric for quite some time. It's bound to happen though.
I hope I'm dead by then.
I expect F1 cars will still have engines until at least 2040. Is that long enough to get ones affairs in order?

Bo_apex

2,568 posts

219 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
paulguitar said:
Bo_apex said:
Max is proving to be Schumacher-esq in extracting the maximum from his car with metronomic style.

Sainz jumping into the second Red Bull would spice things up but they've been team mates before and Max had the measure of Carlos.

P2 onwards is pretty tight this season.
Yes, it's currently quite similar to the Schumacher dominance seasons. Significant car advantage and subservient number two journeyman in the second car.
Red Bull is more reminiscent of the Mercedes order with Bottas / Hamilton.


Bo_apex

2,568 posts

219 months

Monday 22nd April
quotequote all
Forester1965 said:
It's the artificial juxtaposition of having to electrify the cars to placate the manufacturers whilst not going full electric because the technology isn't there to drive a GP distance and the silence would be wk.

In which case let's just have ICE and drop the pretence.
Agree.
Otherwise F1 will evolve into something truly exciting like FE.

V10's would also reduce the budgets.

China lap record still held by MSC in a V10 ? Such is progress biggrin