Discussion
I had a 1981 900 in the 80s and while it was a worthy enough car, I lost interest after being loaned a Cavalier Mk II 1.6 which seemed like a GTI in comparison. It rusted in the hatch and the engine mounts came loose which was odd. I did like it but these days I think it would really feel its age.
Kiltox said:
These any good? Specifically a 2.0 automatic.
Not needing it to set the world on fire, just drive around it
Which shape? Classic (79-93) or GM (94-98)?Not needing it to set the world on fire, just drive around it
The classics are lovely old buses but condition is everything.
GM cars are not the last word in handling and the 2.0 is slow and very thirsty (especially attached to an auto box). The later the better. A comfy place to soak up the miles though.
I had a GM one once, 1994 model, bought it 110,000, sold at 150,000. Worked like a dream. fantastic in a straight line (very comfortable), takes corners like a whale on a skateboard though. Huge boot as well, swallowed a washing machine once.
A very good workhorse, I had 2.0i manual and was getting 34mpg in everyday driving and alot of motorway miles.
A very good workhorse, I had 2.0i manual and was getting 34mpg in everyday driving and alot of motorway miles.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff