Why do diesels have lower rev limiter?

Why do diesels have lower rev limiter?

Author
Discussion

Man from UNCLE

3,762 posts

219 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
manic47 said:
I have some experience of this. weeping
+1 I was able to get to the hard shoulder & stall it. A ride home from the AA & a change of turbo for a second hand one I had in stock & everything was good again.

FreeLitres

6,054 posts

178 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
Thank God I don't have one of these nasty oil-burning killing machines!

Man from UNCLE

3,762 posts

219 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
^^ I wouldn't be without mine.

Agoogy

7,274 posts

249 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
easily sorted...gently rub off the numbers that are ont he rev counter now and then carefully apply some new numbers whereby it starts at 0 and where it currently says 5,000, you put 7 or 8,000 bingo.

All of a sudden the performance matches your visual expectation based on perceived revs...

angusc43

11,506 posts

209 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
paddyhasneeds said:
Sorry to show my lack of engine knowledge here, but why do diesels always have a much lower rev limiter than petrol cars?
Because they are designed to go in tractors and in industrial plant.

angusc43

11,506 posts

209 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
angusc43 said:
paddyhasneeds said:
Sorry to show my lack of engine knowledge here, but why do diesels always have a much lower rev limiter than petrol cars?
Because they are designed to go in tractors and in industrial plant.
And what does that have to do with the rev limit? Nothing? Cool.
I was being tongue in cheek. As others have pointed out it's because of the time it takes to burn diesel via compression as opposed to burning petrol via a spark.

But diesel engines are good for tractors. A million farmers can't be wrong.

Charlie Foxtrot

3,046 posts

216 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
Mikeyplum said:
There is also a good, sort of, tutorial where this yank guy strips down an engine which was victim to the turbo seals going and "running away"... should see the state on the internals! yikes
This one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmkHTkmj2_U

I love it at 5 min in when he is explaining the spun bearings and says "this engine was on the edge of taking a st!"

It's a very good video.

Mikeyplum

1,646 posts

170 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
Charlie Foxtrot said:
This one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmkHTkmj2_U

I love it at 5 min in when he is explaining the spun bearings and says "this engine was on the edge of taking a st!"

It's a very good video.
Can't tell at the moment as I'm in work (Damn you "Media Streaming Banned" filters!!)
But I'm guessing that's the one! laugh

I love how excited he is about a mashed engine!!

angusc43

11,506 posts

209 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
angusc43 said:
doogz said:
angusc43 said:
paddyhasneeds said:
Sorry to show my lack of engine knowledge here, but why do diesels always have a much lower rev limiter than petrol cars?
Because they are designed to go in tractors and in industrial plant.
And what does that have to do with the rev limit? Nothing? Cool.
I was being tongue in cheek. As others have pointed out it's because of the time it takes to burn diesel via compression as opposed to burning petrol via a spark.

But diesel engines are good for tractors. A million farmers can't be wrong.
Ah, fair enough, thought you were being a retarded petrol snob.
You got me there. I have been a a retarded petrol snob for 30 years. I experienced bad psychological damage in the late 80's/early 90s from driving some truly awful first gen diesels (Cavalier 1.7 TDi anyone?) Very slowly coming round to the view that the latest diesels are maybe worth looking at. Actually quite enjoyed the test drive in a E Class 280 CDI. Not enough to buy it though. Maybe next time. Unless I test drive a 5.5 V8 E Class first.....



Vladimir

6,917 posts

159 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
Just thinking about this on my walk around the countryside (as you do).

Now a four pot single turbo diesel (like our old Astra 1.9CDTi 150) can be hustled along fairly quickly BUT the useful power band is 2500rpm to about 4000rpm - 1500 of useful revs.

But then look at a decent bi-turbo six pot like our current 335d - useful rev range is 1500 (when turbo one kicks in) to just under the red line - 5000rpm. That's 3500 useful revs - more than twice the four pot.

However most judge all diesels on mainstream four pots and that's that - fair enough the view of them is fairly dim.

Now let's compare to a mad bad purists high revving car - maybe a CTR, maybe a more exotic 911 Turbo - useful rev range for a CTR? I'd say 6000-9000. And the 911 Turbo - no point revving it about 5500rpm and the fun starts at 3000ish - so 2500rpm of fun.

So while the noise isn't as good (I'd say a wrung out 330d/35d unit sounds better than most four pots though), the "fun band" is similar.

Ready for a cr4p analogy?

It's like only taking notice of boxers that punch to the head while ignoring body punch boxers like Hatton because they don't box as "pretty." Both come up with the same result - going quickly - but one is more glam and therefore "cooler."

Charlie Foxtrot

3,046 posts

216 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
Mikeyplum said:
Charlie Foxtrot said:
This one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmkHTkmj2_U

I love it at 5 min in when he is explaining the spun bearings and says "this engine was on the edge of taking a st!"

It's a very good video.
Can't tell at the moment as I'm in work (Damn you "Media Streaming Banned" filters!!)
But I'm guessing that's the one! laugh

I love how excited he is about a mashed engine!!
I've just been watching loads of his videos running diagnostics on fked engines. It's great, nothing I didn't know already but really good wathing and a guy who must really enjoy his work.

Mikeyplum

1,646 posts

170 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
Charlie Foxtrot said:
Mikeyplum said:
Charlie Foxtrot said:
This one? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmkHTkmj2_U

I love it at 5 min in when he is explaining the spun bearings and says "this engine was on the edge of taking a st!"

It's a very good video.
Can't tell at the moment as I'm in work (Damn you "Media Streaming Banned" filters!!)
But I'm guessing that's the one! laugh

I love how excited he is about a mashed engine!!
I've just been watching loads of his videos running diagnostics on fked engines. It's great, nothing I didn't know already but really good wathing and a guy who must really enjoy his work.
I've got a mental note to YouTube him when I get home...

I remember chuckling at that one video and haven't seen the rest, so will have a butchers! biggrin

Vladimir

6,917 posts

159 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
Yes Angus and you forget that your low revving V8 is actually not unlike a big diesel. Except most handle better than your corroding old E class luxobarge...

E55 AMG - maybe.

E500? Naaaah.

angusc43

11,506 posts

209 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
Vladimir said:
Yes Angus and you forget that your low revving V8 is actually not unlike a big diesel.
Well in some ways you're right. Lots of bottom end, yes. Less top end than the later n/a 5.5. But loads more top than any of the diesels. And silky smooth to boot.

Vladimir said:
Except most handle better than your corroding old E class luxobarge...
Steady on. It's not corroding (it's galvanised). But yes, it's a luxobarge. Air suspension makes it surprisingly handy, though.
Vladimir said:
E55 AMG - maybe.

E500? Naaaah.
Fair enough. It's not an E55. But it's still a very refined petrol which suits the car's character very well.


Edited by angusc43 on Monday 16th May 22:54

angusc43

11,506 posts

209 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
angusc43 said:
doogz said:
angusc43 said:
doogz said:
angusc43 said:
paddyhasneeds said:
Sorry to show my lack of engine knowledge here, but why do diesels always have a much lower rev limiter than petrol cars?
Because they are designed to go in tractors and in industrial plant.
And what does that have to do with the rev limit? Nothing? Cool.
I was being tongue in cheek. As others have pointed out it's because of the time it takes to burn diesel via compression as opposed to burning petrol via a spark.

But diesel engines are good for tractors. A million farmers can't be wrong.
Ah, fair enough, thought you were being a retarded petrol snob.
You got me there. I have been a a retarded petrol snob for 30 years. I experienced bad psychological damage in the late 80's/early 90s from driving some truly awful first gen diesels (Cavalier 1.7 TDi anyone?) Very slowly coming round to the view that the latest diesels are maybe worth looking at. Actually quite enjoyed the test drive in a E Class 280 CDI. Not enough to buy it though. Maybe next time. Unless I test drive a 5.5 V8 E Class first.....
I'm not saying you have to like them. TBH i don't, but in a 4x4 it's the best solution for me atm.

It just seemed like you were being stupid, obviously i didn't get that you were being a bit sarcastic first time round.
What really turned my head was when Chris Harris (Autocar/Drivers Republic/Evo) ran a facelift 320 CDI with air supension and a Brabus chip and loved it. That would give my car a real run for it's money and burn less fuel. Diesels have come a long way in the last five or so years.

ZeeTacoe

5,444 posts

223 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
Vladimir said:
Just thinking about this on my walk around the countryside (as you do).

Now a four pot single turbo diesel (like our old Astra 1.9CDTi 150) can be hustled along fairly quickly BUT the useful power band is 2500rpm to about 4000rpm - 1500 of useful revs.

But then look at a decent bi-turbo six pot like our current 335d - useful rev range is 1500 (when turbo one kicks in) to just under the red line - 5000rpm. That's 3500 useful revs - more than twice the four pot.

However most judge all diesels on mainstream four pots and that's that - fair enough the view of them is fairly dim.

Now let's compare to a mad bad purists high revving car - maybe a CTR, maybe a more exotic 911 Turbo - useful rev range for a CTR? I'd say 6000-9000. And the 911 Turbo - no point revving it about 5500rpm and the fun starts at 3000ish - so 2500rpm of fun.
Really? Looking at a dyno-chart for one the 335d seems to make peak torque at 1500rpm then hits peak power at 4200rpm after that it quickly tails off. 4200-1500 gives you a mere 2700rpm of usefulness.

shuvitupya

3,219 posts

218 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
Parrot of Doom said:
I saw a similar thing a few weeks back. Everyone had to crawl past the poor woman, wondering what was wrong with her Rover 25:
It was made by Rover, that's the problem. hehe

busta

4,504 posts

234 months

Monday 16th May 2011
quotequote all
eldar said:
This is the answer. Plus the risk of scouring lubrication oil and using it as fuel...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5zx3qKX_Pno
Not sure what that's got to do with engine revs? Landrovers like the one you posted, and most other diesels that suffer from a 'runaway', do it because the turbo seals fail.

Hasbeen

2,073 posts

222 months

Tuesday 17th May 2011
quotequote all
It can get worse than just the engine blowing up.

I was involved with a few others in helping the skipper of a 50Ft fiberglass catamaran ferry a few years back.

The diesel in one hull had run away, & finally blown up. He thought he was in enough trouble, but had got it into harbour & tied to a jetty. No one had noticed in the excitement that the side with the blown motor was getting lower in the water, until it was down a couple of feet.

A bit of the blown engine had gone through the hull, leaving about a 4" hole. A lot of water comes through a 4" hole. We tied a large 112 footer alongside, while someone found something to shove into the hole from the outside underwater. Everything in that engine room was under water, & he had to go & buy a 5 horse power petrol pump to pump it out, & keep it out. Poor bugger.

busta

4,504 posts

234 months

Tuesday 17th May 2011
quotequote all
Worse things happen at see you know. smile