Why was Honda NSX not a great seller?

Why was Honda NSX not a great seller?

Author
Discussion

Renn Sport

2,761 posts

209 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
A car honed by Senna and built to a high dynamic standard.

Whats not to like... but even at the time it was a VERY expensive Honda. I don't think the buyers were used to paying that sort of money for a Honda.

Excellent motor car though. I'd like one for a bit.

Hasbeen

2,073 posts

221 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
I don't think many people even know they exist.

Even today, when people see the Honda badge on the back of my S2000 many say they never knew Honda made a car like that.

If they don't know of the more common S2000, they are very unlikely to know about the NSX.

diddly69

695 posts

177 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Johnboy Mac said:
B Huey said:
It looked odd, was underpowered and overpriced.

Next question.
I'll translate.


The design gave great visability and made it as easy to drive as your mother's 1.2
The chassis was so brilliant it could have handled a lot more power
The price reflected it's overall quality and most couldn't see past the badge

biggrin
Well said!
biggrin

navier_stokes

948 posts

199 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Saw a nice yellow on bumbling through Godmanchester the other day - very understated on the road, but very unique!

smn159

12,672 posts

217 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Renn Sport said:
A car honed by Senna
How big a part did Senna actually play in the development? I thought that he drove it for a couple of laps and told Honda that the chassis wasn't stiff enough...

Not trying to be contentious - please enlighten me!

Olivera

7,149 posts

239 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
It was £52,000 in 1990, so approx £100,000 in todays money. Not a fiscal bargain.

entropy

Original Poster:

5,443 posts

203 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
smn159 said:
How big a part did Senna actually play in the development? I thought that he drove it for a couple of laps and told Honda that the chassis wasn't stiff enough...

Not trying to be contentious - please enlighten me!
He requested the handling be neutral

entropy

Original Poster:

5,443 posts

203 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Wayney said:
The car was never marketed well?

911 goes GT racing and dominate the GT3 class at Lemans. The GTR made a big song and dance about being quicker then 911 turbo around the ring. Ferrari is ever present in F1, Audi dominate LeMans etc etc etc

Where was Honda's marketing, apart from the odd Lemans entry??
How much effort did Honda cash in Senna?

Nick3point2

3,917 posts

180 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Johnboy Mac said:
A valid point. But wasn't that one of the nice things about the NSX being low key thus making it rather cool.
How many people though are interested in a low key car in the NSX's price bracket when new?

One of the things that sells expensive cars is that everyone can see it's an expensive car!

Marf

22,907 posts

241 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Nobody wanted to spend 911/Fezza money on a Honda.

Sad but true.

Wasn't that much a flop in the US though was it?

snuffle

1,587 posts

182 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Pesty said:
I've always loved the NSX fantasic cars (should have bought one when I had the chance)
me too.

maybe one day.

belleair302

6,843 posts

207 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
The brand did not create enough of a stir about the NSX Badge. Honda should have launched it as a stand along product with NO HONDA badging anywhere. The price was not silly and the magazines gave it a 5* rating but the interior styling....not the fit and finish were just not upto what people wanted for a top end sports car. The only other possible problem was the lack of noise from the exhausts / engine. Otherwise the manuals are still great cars and better than anything else made in that time period. A 928 GTS would come close second...

Lets Torque

10,974 posts

157 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
MX7 said:
Supplying engines to F1?
Senna helped with development aswell.

55allgold

519 posts

158 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
coyft said:
I don't recall it having bad reviews in fact quite the opposite. I bought mine in 1991 not long after it was launched, I was influenced quite heavily by the rave reviews it received. Perhaps I was reading different magazines.
Agreed. I know that the original stormed the annual Autocar handling test (the one they used to do at a circuit each year). Might even have won 2 years running (not quite sure). IIRC that magazine's testers stopped adoring the NSX when the power steering was added.

My guess is that it wasn't a dream car/brand. Porsche, Ferrari, etc had been fuelling schoolboy dreams for decades. When those schoolboys were rich grown-ups in the '90s, the Honda/NSX wasn't a strong enough idea to overcome those dreams.

RobM77

35,349 posts

234 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
The NSX is one of my favourite cars ever. Such an amazing chassis and setup; a truly wonderful drive, and also very comfortable for road use. I also love the understated looks, and of course the beautiful Honda V6 and it's unforgettable sound.

The reasons it didn't sell are most probably a combination of everything mentioned already: not that fast, a lack of badge kudos, a fairly sombre interior, and not marketed well enough. On that latter point, I realise Honda were in F1 with Senna at the time (MP4-7 - one of my all time favourite F1 cars cloud9), but their actual direct marketing for the car was pretty poor. I've got an NSX brochure and it reads like a brochure for an MX5, except without the bits about the great handling...

bayemvay

49 posts

158 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Marf said:
Wasn't that much a flop in the US though was it?
Was a huge success there. They got pretty much universal glowing reviews from the US automotive press and it helped that they were sold under the Acura brand there. Smart move, as it helped shift more of both NSXs and other Acuras with the halo effect.

Curious and a shame that they decided to launch the brand only in North America and not here, a much more badge-obsessed land.

sorepaws

12 posts

162 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
They only sold about 19,000 - Ferrari sold 500 348's ? and ~12,000 355 - comparable numbers. But the NSX doesnt have the Badge. Maybe the NSX lasts too long many having over 100,000 miles on the clock and used as "daily drives". Nothing is as exciting as a car that won't start or breaks down - then the NSX isn't exciting. Porsche have to be the masters though making a car in large numbers and still desirable.

Modern day "equivalents" the Audi R8 - how many have been sold?

I like my old ('91) NSX and rather pleased there arn't too many around, it maybe flawed but its hard to argue with the Honda dealer when they charge you only £120 for an oil change and "A" service.

Johnboy Mac

2,666 posts

178 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
Nick3point2 said:
Johnboy Mac said:
A valid point. But wasn't that one of the nice things about the NSX being low key thus making it rather cool.
How many people though are interested in a low key car in the NSX's price bracket when new?

One of the things that sells expensive cars is that everyone can see it's an expensive car!
The badge aspect has been covered already, still an important point.

Animal

5,250 posts

268 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
sorepaws said:
Modern day "equivalents" the Audi R8 - how many have been sold?
I was going to suggest Noble - maybe the M600? Apparently a great car, but £200k of your own money? Would you really stray from the norm? It's not as if Ferrari/Lamborghini et al make bad cars...

Saw a bright yellow NSX at Brands Hatch yesterday - I would!

Marf

22,907 posts

241 months

Tuesday 31st May 2011
quotequote all
bayemvay said:
Marf said:
Wasn't that much a flop in the US though was it?
Was a huge success there. They got pretty much universal glowing reviews from the US automotive press and it helped that they were sold under the Acura brand there. Smart move, as it helped shift more of both NSXs and other Acuras with the halo effect.

Curious and a shame that they decided to launch the brand only in North America and not here, a much more badge-obsessed land.
I don't think we were that badge obsessed at the time. The whole rebranding of Japanese cars in the US is set against an insular automotive mindset, hence Acura, DSM etc.

We didn't/don't have that same prejudice against foreign cars that existed in the US, hence why they never launched the Acura brand here.