RE: Is A Diesel M Car On The Way?
Discussion
Zod said:
Aizle said:
It seems to be listed for the F10 and F11 (I assume this is the estate?).
Goodbye petrol M car
The petrol M car comes out this autumn.Goodbye petrol M car
I'm all for downsizing petrol engines and turbos.
SD1992 said:
Dracoro said:
Do you *really* think this will do 40mpg. I would say it will struggle to get over 30mpg, probably closer to the 25mpg you mentioned. The M5 will struggle to get late teens driven the same way.
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it will be a decent car and certainly more economical than an M5 but it won't get 40mpg all day long.
Surely it would get pretty good figures sitting at 70 on the motorway? I would imagine it would be at tickover at that speed. Doesn't seem unrealistic to me, buy obviously when the lead foot comes out the figures will plummet. Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it will be a decent car and certainly more economical than an M5 but it won't get 40mpg all day long.
What do people average in the 535d?
BMW need 4WD non SUV in their model range because they are losing a lot of sales because of its absence. The last two poor winters have seen a lot of BMW's parked on drives for days/weeks whilst their FWD/AWD competitors have been largely unaffected. I know this because the first one my M3 didnt move for the best part of 3 weeks and last year my Z4 was the same.
Sure you can buy winter tyres/wheels but why go through the expense and the hassle when you can go and buy "insert non RWD brand here".
Sure you can buy winter tyres/wheels but why go through the expense and the hassle when you can go and buy "insert non RWD brand here".
BMW should bring Alpina in-house (if it isn't already) and have M division cars only ever be petrol powered, and Alpina cars only be performance diesel. As a customer you can choose which suits you, it doesn't dilute either sub-brand. Reading the reviews the D3 is a great car, but you could never accuse it of detracting from M3 sales.
Riggers said:
E30M3SE said:
E21_Ross said:
probably means M sport or something.....
When has a ///M car ever been called a Mxxxxx..................
Edited by E30M3SE on Tuesday 9th August 12:09
Riggers said:
E30M3SE said:
E21_Ross said:
probably means M sport or something.....
When has a ///M car ever been called a Mxxxxx..................
paulmon said:
BMW need 4WD non SUV in their model range because they are losing a lot of sales because of its absence. The last two poor winters have seen a lot of BMW's parked on drives for days/weeks whilst their FWD/AWD competitors have been largely unaffected. I know this because the first one my M3 didnt move for the best part of 3 weeks and last year my Z4 was the same.
Sure you can buy winter tyres/wheels but why go through the expense and the hassle when you can go and buy "insert non RWD brand here".
I've always wondered why they are not selling the "x" versions in the UK (320xd, 530xd etc...). See them quite a lot in Germany and Switzerland.Sure you can buy winter tyres/wheels but why go through the expense and the hassle when you can go and buy "insert non RWD brand here".
Why not?????
Alpina Proved with the D3 in the uk and the previous D10 ( the forgotten Alpina) in europe that you can have an amazing chassis with an amzing derv lump.
If it happens i would expect Alpina are already working on it for BMW. Alpina were the guys who developed the 535d engine after BMW gave up on it
Alpina Proved with the D3 in the uk and the previous D10 ( the forgotten Alpina) in europe that you can have an amazing chassis with an amzing derv lump.
If it happens i would expect Alpina are already working on it for BMW. Alpina were the guys who developed the 535d engine after BMW gave up on it
Jakg said:
Some people would love an M5 as a daily driver, but do 20+k a year so just can't justify a 25 MPG car.
Imagine all the focus on handling & performance in a car that could do 40+ MPG, or have 800+ miles range - that would be the ultimate daily driver (for me, at least).
Bring it on... Imagine all the focus on handling & performance in a car that could do 40+ MPG, or have 800+ miles range - that would be the ultimate daily driver (for me, at least).
Based on how well the new 520d handled when given a 700 mile spanking recently, I'd buy one of these.
Dracoro said:
Do you *really* think this will do 40mpg. I would say it will struggle to get over 30mpg, probably closer to the 25mpg you mentioned. The M5 will struggle to get late teens driven the same way.
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it will be a decent car and certainly more economical than an M5 but it won't get 40mpg all day long. To drive in a way that gets good mpg, you'd not be using much of that 395bhp (in which case, just get a 530d and get another 10 mpg. Use the 395bhp as it is intended and you'll never get 40mpg.
I don't think it will do 40 MPG whilst unleashing 400 BHP - no car will. However, for "normal driving" I think it'll deliver 40+ MPG, but when you want it will also deliver near enough 400 BHP - which for me would be a brilliant mix.Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it will be a decent car and certainly more economical than an M5 but it won't get 40mpg all day long. To drive in a way that gets good mpg, you'd not be using much of that 395bhp (in which case, just get a 530d and get another 10 mpg. Use the 395bhp as it is intended and you'll never get 40mpg.
Edited by Dracoro on Tuesday 9th August 11:55
I would have no problem enduring 20 MPG if enjoying an M5 500 horses - but I couldn't justify 25 MPG cruising to work and not using that power.
I can't justify a petrol with the mileage I do - but that doesn't mean I don't want a focused sports-saloon.
Jakg said:
Dracoro said:
Do you *really* think this will do 40mpg. I would say it will struggle to get over 30mpg, probably closer to the 25mpg you mentioned. The M5 will struggle to get late teens driven the same way.
Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it will be a decent car and certainly more economical than an M5 but it won't get 40mpg all day long. To drive in a way that gets good mpg, you'd not be using much of that 395bhp (in which case, just get a 530d and get another 10 mpg. Use the 395bhp as it is intended and you'll never get 40mpg.
I don't think it will do 40 MPG whilst unleashing 400 BHP - no car will. However, for "normal driving" I think it'll deliver 40+ MPG, but when you want it will also deliver near enough 400 BHP - which for me would be a brilliant mix.Don't get me wrong, I'm sure it will be a decent car and certainly more economical than an M5 but it won't get 40mpg all day long. To drive in a way that gets good mpg, you'd not be using much of that 395bhp (in which case, just get a 530d and get another 10 mpg. Use the 395bhp as it is intended and you'll never get 40mpg.
Edited by Dracoro on Tuesday 9th August 11:55
I would have no problem enduring 20 MPG if enjoying an M5 500 horses - but I couldn't justify 25 MPG cruising to work and not using that power.
I can't justify a petrol with the mileage I do - but that doesn't mean I don't want a focused sports-saloon.
paulmon said:
BMW need 4WD non SUV in their model range because they are losing a lot of sales because of its absence. The last two poor winters have seen a lot of BMW's parked on drives for days/weeks whilst their FWD/AWD competitors have been largely unaffected. I know this because the first one my M3 didnt move for the best part of 3 weeks and last year my Z4 was the same.
Sure you can buy winter tyres/wheels but why go through the expense and the hassle when you can go and buy "insert non RWD brand here".
I'm afraid that BMW don't really care about the occasionaly freak snow in this country. Sure you can buy winter tyres/wheels but why go through the expense and the hassle when you can go and buy "insert non RWD brand here".
Their reasoning behind 4x4 in the road cars is the certain areas of the amercian and canadian market where snow is a bit more regular and hardcore!
I think a Diesel M car is going to happen eventually and I would happliy buy one
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff