A3 2.0TDI sport 3dr or 116i M Sport or 116d se?

A3 2.0TDI sport 3dr or 116i M Sport or 116d se?

Author
Discussion

jonah35

Original Poster:

3,940 posts

158 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
What company car would you have?

The 116i M Sport only does 44mpg whereas the A3 does 68mpg and the 116d se does 64mpg.

In terms of company car tax the A3 and 116d are better than the 116i Msport too.

This is not the new new 1 series.

My thoughts are the A3 2.0TDI as it's reasonably quick, good on fuel and I think it looks better than a 1 series even though it may not be as good dynamically.

There is also the consideration of the A3 1.6tdi 99gm/km which does 74mpg but not sure if that would be too slow.

Not bothered about practicality or space.

So, after waffling, my question is I suppose, is an A3 2.0tdi better than a 116i M Sport or 116d se regardless of the costs involved?

va1o

16,032 posts

208 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
A3 would seem the obvious choice here
More practical inside, better equipped, nicer interior and most importantly its the quickest!

The BMW 116d is an embarrassment as far as the performance/ co2 figures go IMO

FamilyDub

3,587 posts

166 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
A3 TDi was our last car and 116d is her workhorse just now.

The A3 is nicer inside than the BM, but the 116d is far more economical - £30 annual VED and 60mpg easy, plus far more 'feelsome'.

I dare say a Quattro A3 would get around more easily and reliably in the winter too. hehe

Rickyy

6,618 posts

220 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
116i will not do 44MPG unless they have made dramatic changes to the engine. I had a 54 plate 116i Sport and if you drove gently you could average 34MPG.

It was also dog slow, 0-60 in nearly 11 seconds. Although I do believe they upped the power in later versions, so this post may be useless to you! smile

DennisTheMenace

15,603 posts

269 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
Currently got an A3 sport while i sort out my company car, if you like driving get the BM, the Audi is old hat and due for replacement, and the handling is awful, comes from the same school of mid corner weigh up in the steering as the Vectra..


jonah35

Original Poster:

3,940 posts

158 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
thanks chaps, yeah the a3 is a bit 'old hat' i suppose it has been out a while but the BM is also being replaced too.

I don't really like either and can't really muster much enthusiasm for any of them - a 123d M sport or A3 Black Edition would be much better imho.

However, don't want to pay to 'trade up' as that makes the point of a company car not be that worthwhile.

I think I may just go down the route of the Audi as that is what the masses have said, although the BMW seems a better drivers car but let's face it neither are true drivers cars and 99% of the time will be on a motorway!

FamilyDub

3,587 posts

166 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
Don't know how much (or if you'd be allowed to) extra you could go, but I kept trying to get the OH to stretch as far as a 318/320d.

DennisTheMenace

15,603 posts

269 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
If its just going to be sat on the motorway, get the Audi. Its ok at that, it's just when you peel off and press on it looses the plot!

the BMW i had was the 320 m sport, was a bit fidgety, oh and run flat tyres suck!

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
What a crap pair of cars to choose from. The 116d is an absolute dismal miserable slug of a thing and the A3 is a completely unremarkable and overpriced stodgy pudding. I cannot think of two more un PH cars.

We have one of each as pool cars in work, chosen by junior salestts in polyester suits who have now left. Sometimes, when all the good cars are gone, I have to drive one through mid wales. I've been known to put the journey off a day or two rather than take the 116d. The A3 is much less painful, as it's not so gutless.


FamilyDub

3,587 posts

166 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
Oi! hehe

jonah35

Original Poster:

3,940 posts

158 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
FamilyDub said:
Don't know how much (or if you'd be allowed to) extra you could go, but I kept trying to get the OH to stretch as far as a 318/320d.
they're changing the 3 series

yes, i know they're all not great chaps but to me a new 3 series saloon is just about as 'reppy' as you get even though an A3/1 series are not much better.

I fully agree though that a 3 series is a better car but for whizzing into parking spaces etc they are a bit big given that only one person will be in it all the time

jonah35

Original Poster:

3,940 posts

158 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
dme123 said:
What a crap pair of cars to choose from. The 116d is an absolute dismal miserable slug of a thing and the A3 is a completely unremarkable and overpriced stodgy pudding. I cannot think of two more un PH cars.

We have one of each as pool cars in work, chosen by junior salestts in polyester suits who have now left. Sometimes, when all the good cars are gone, I have to drive one through mid wales. I've been known to put the journey off a day or two rather than take the 116d. The A3 is much less painful, as it's not so gutless.
again, I don't disagree.

trouble is PH car and company car tax don't compute! that's why you have weekend toys!! plus something PH is not great on the usual motorway traffic commute etc.

interesting to hear that people think the A3 is much quicker, it's not the 170 version but the 140.

To be honest even the 116d would be enough for me, I don't want a quick car really as I don't want to be tempted to speed.

This is a monday to friday kind of thing I know it's not a great car etc smile

va1o

16,032 posts

208 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
Golf match or gt with the 2.0 tdi 140 bluemotion technologies engine maybe worth a look? 119g/ km co2 job, bit more modern than the 1-series/ a3

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
Drive one before you decide it'd be enough. It's very frustrating, it feels like the handbrake is on all the time, or you're towing a trailer load of cement. It's not so bad when you're going at a steady speed, but if you want to overtake on an A road you will find opportunities few and far between.

Sam.F

1,144 posts

201 months

Thursday 29th September 2011
quotequote all
I don't dislike my OH's 116d.

She's had it about 18 months, during which time it has averaged around 47mpg despite doing a lot of town work - more like 54-55 on the motorway when keeping speed to sensible levels and we saw 63mpg on the OBC on a long A9 trip in Scotland a few weeks ago.

It's quite refined and rides a lot better than my car. It is *not* fast though and definitely feels slower than my sister's Golf TDI 105 despite supposedly having more power and torque. It's perfectly adequate on the motorway (2000rpm at sensible speed so in power band) but I often find it wanting in situations where you want to overtake!