RE: Driven (Just A Little Bit More): Ginetta G60

RE: Driven (Just A Little Bit More): Ginetta G60

Monday 17th October 2011

Driven (Just A Little Bit More): Ginetta G60

It's the Farb, er, Ginetta F400 Jim, but not as we know it...


The Ginetta G60 looking glamorous in its orange finery, but we've still not really driven it...
The Ginetta G60 looking glamorous in its orange finery, but we've still not really driven it...
Having been briefly unleashed (well OK, it was a gentlemanly 'potter') for a few laps around Elvington Airfield in the Ginetta F400 prototype a couple of months back, I was looking forward to a go in the finished car when it was unveiled at Silverstone on Friday.

...although we've had two steers in this!
...although we've had two steers in this!
Except it turned out to be a 'static unveil' for a car henceforward to be referred to as the Ginetta G60 (see specs/price here), and another opportunity to drive instead the blue/grey F400 development hack that I'd already dodged cones with at Elvington. (See previous article.)

I jumped at the chance of a brief 10 mile spin on the roads around Silverstone though, because although the G60 is by no means a mainstream choice, the concept of a genuinely 'nanny-free' sports car appeals greatly to the heroic inner-caveman that lurks beneath this urbane, nay genteel, exterior. And unlike the grin-a-minute G40R it's supposed to be a proper road car, not a track toy with number plates.

Ginetta boss Lawrence Tomlinson did the unveiling honours, assisted by the bevy of 'pit-babes' (I think that's what you call them!) that made the PH homepage on Friday. Chatting to him afterwards, he was typically forthright about his aspirations for the new G60. Customer deliveries start in March but that's only - as far as I can tell - those customers who were already on the waiting list for Farbio versions.


'We're not looking to educate everyone to want a car with no driver aids, but a lot of cars need all that stuff because the chassis is sh*t,' he says. 'You've got an upward spiral on weight, and a downward spiral on handling.'

Weight is not something that afflicts the G60, which at 1080kgs comes in at nearly 350kgs below a 'zero-specced' Porsche 911, and a quick blat up the road was enough to reinforce the notion that the G60 is quick. Not McLaren or Noble quick, but certainly British A- and B-Road quick, which is good enough for me. It sounds great when you push it too, with a lovely rasping bark as the revs spin towards the 6500rpm red line - although driven more gently it's surprisingly cruisey, with very low wind and road noise, apart from a roar on one side of the test car caused by a dodgy pre-production seal.

Sadly, the development car still hasn't had its new steering arm fitted, or its lower-effort brake master cylinder, so arm-twirling can be energy sapping and the brake pedal needs a mighty shove - hence my disappointment not to be driving the finished G60. The pedal box hasn't been aligned properly yet either, but even so, a few miles of twisty country roads was enough to feel the promise of good things to come.


There's some proper feedback and feel through the steering wheel for starters, and the chassis rides the backroads with a poise, agility and refinement over bumps that's certain to encourage further exploration of its capabilities. As long as you remember where the buck stops when nanny's not watching...

Still, while we're still waiting for the definitive G60 drive, we have had a chance to look over the (near as dammit?) final production car in the Silverstone paddock - and things are certainly much improved over the F400.

There's no real sign of design artistry in the interior, but it looks clean, simple and well made - more of a workspace than a club lounge, but that seems to suit the car's nature well. And the exterior tweaks look good too, with new carbon fibre intakes on the haunches that apparently improve air-flow as well as (I think) the visuals.

Overall, the G60 retains a 'specialist' feel - no question. But Ginetta is a racing car company, and for the handful of customers it seeks to attract, I reckon the G60 will be all the better for it. But can we have a go in a finished one please..?



Author
Discussion

mazdaman1980

Original Poster:

140 posts

205 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
Why launch a car when its not complete. Surely waiting another month for the steering, brakes etc and launch a moving object will get people more excited!

Shocking in this day and age.

V8 GRF

7,294 posts

211 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
The cars are a gnats whisker of being finished and I imagine that Ginetta wanted to conincide this event with the final race of their various series where they would be sure to get an audience.

The cars have been completly redesigned and it's really only the bodywork that is the same as the Farbio, the list of everything that's been changed is seriously exhaustive.

The list below is from the press release:

3.7 litre engine
ATB differential
Fly-by-wire throttle
Full new wiring loom
ECU
Pedal box
Chassis
Interior modifications
New Carbon Fibre Air intake
Revised cooling vents
Air conditioning
Full Braking system (including master cylinders, callipers, discs, brake pads and handbrake)
Steering column
Steering rack
Uprights
Wishbones
Touch screen instrument system
Front and rear lights
Dashboard
Clutch
Revised cooling system
Removal of power steering
Electrical window mechanism


That's why it's taken so long to emerge and looking at all the work I don't think that's too shabby for just over a year.

The press cars will be available in the next week or so I'd suggest your patience is about to be rewarded.

kambites

67,643 posts

222 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
Definitely the most promising drivers' car coming onto the market, IMO. At least until you get to the Noble, which is a somewhat beyond my means. hehe

bobberz

1,832 posts

200 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all


Wouldn't mind a go in one. The car looks fun, too!










(Someone was going to say it sooner or later.) getmecoat

bobberz

1,832 posts

200 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
Mr. Tomlinson said:
We're not looking to education everyone to want a car with no driver aids, but a lot of cars need all that stuff because the chassis is sh*t,' he says. 'You've got an upward spiral on weight, and a downward spiral on handling.
I had trouble reading this. Anyone else put off by Mr. Tomlinson's seeming lack of understanding of the English language?

The more I see of this car, the more I like it. Looks good in orange. Unfortunately, it'll never see these shores. frown

V8 GRF

7,294 posts

211 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
Hubert K said:
next week... next week.... next week... can´t hear this anymore !!!
@V8 GRF are you working at Ginetta or just repeating the press releases ?

Sorry, but I don´t believe anything concerning Ginetta G60 anymore. I wish the cars were as fine as Ginetta public relations (only concerning press, not costumers).

btw G60 Teaser and other videos at Ginetta TV are brilliant !!!
As I mentioned the bits I quoted are from the press release. I don't work for Ginetta I'm a member of the TVRCC and write for our club magazine. I drove the blue/grey development car in July and it was pretty good then although the brakes needed the servo removing as they required too much effort in comparison to the incredibly light accelerator.

The car I saw on Friday was much more finished and 'together' package than the one I drove in July so I'd say a lot of work has gone on in the meantime.

LT admitted that when he originally drove the Farbio he was caught up in his own enthusiasm for the project but once they started looking at the car they realised that the car was not production ready. So to quote LT 'they started at the front number plate and worked their way to the back.'

I think they've achieved a great deal and have attempted to avoid the typical 'low volume car manufacturer' problems of letting the owners do the development work.

ctallchris

1,266 posts

180 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
If you want a small lightweight MR British car for that price why would you pass over a lotus Evora? Usually with small volume track cars you would say it's cheaper but the lotus is cheaper and very similarly matched.

Hellbound

2,500 posts

177 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
As soon as this is released in its absolute final, production ready, built to order, customer specced guise, we should have a shoot out with an Evora.

I just don't want to read another review filled with statements like '...the final car will have improved this and better that...'.

loveice

649 posts

248 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
ctallchris said:
If you want a small lightweight MR British car for that price why would you pass over a lotus Evora? Usually with small volume track cars you would say it's cheaper but the lotus is cheaper and very similarly matched.
Because, Lotus isn't British?

GTRene

16,675 posts

225 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
bobberz said:


Wouldn't mind a go in one. The car looks fun, too!










(Someone was going to say it sooner or later.) getmecoat
loll biggrin indeed, every time the come up with a bunch of lovely and wanna have looking girls.

TallTom

208 posts

160 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
bobberz said:


Wouldn't mind a go in one. The car looks fun, too!



(Someone was going to say it sooner or later.) getmecoat
I saw that picture and thought the same thing, that brunette is rather tasty! lick

getmecoat

MrTappets

881 posts

192 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
loveice said:
Because, Lotus isn't British?
You'll be trying to convince me Lambo is German next

RJDM3

1,441 posts

206 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
Interior is terrible for a production car. Much work needed still

Moogle

257 posts

171 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
ctallchris said:
If you want a small lightweight MR British car for that price why would you pass over a lotus Evora? Usually with small volume track cars you would say it's cheaper but the lotus is cheaper and very similarly matched.
Lotus Evora = 1350Kg
Ginetta G60 = 1080Kg

If you don't know what that means, buy an Evora smile

PhilJames

234 posts

194 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
loveice said:
ctallchris said:
If you want a small lightweight MR British car for that price why would you pass over a lotus Evora? Usually with small volume track cars you would say it's cheaper but the lotus is cheaper and very similarly matched.
Because, Lotus isn't British?
He's right! Why would you pass over a Lotus Evora? (Even if it wasn't British)

I like Ginetta but if Lotus get slagged off for the Evora interior, what happened with this? You know the Evora will be better engineered too. Mybe we should see the Ginetta in GT2?

Chris-R

756 posts

188 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
bobberz said:
I had trouble reading this. Anyone else put off by Mr. Tomlinson's seeming lack of understanding of the English language?

The more I see of this car, the more I like it. Looks good in orange. Unfortunately, it'll never see these shores. frown
Oops - that was the PH spellchecker on autopilot! smile

cathalm

606 posts

245 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
A bit disappointed with this. I was holding a candle to the prospect of LT taking up where TVR left off (maybe even getting hold of the TVR name) and applying some solid business sense to the low volume British car industry.

While this car looks good (did as a Farbio too)I just can't see that it will be a commercial success. Sure it's all lightweight now and many changes have been made but how can it stand up in the face of the competition? Setting Porsches aside since this is hardly comparable in terms of comforts and even discounting the Evora for the same reason the car is aimed at folks who want the stripped out drivers car thing. Fine for low volume but can anybody tell me why significant numbers of people would buy this over the new V6 Exige? It is less powerful, slower and a third again as expensive. Just can't see what it offers over that car at all and with such a price differential LT is looking at a financial disaster here.

It's not often that Lotus end up with a branding advantage these days, taking on Porsche, Ferrari etc but there's a clear advantage in brand, supporting Network, likelihood of thorough development and so on. Consider even the impending ALFA 4C if it gets this new 300bhp engine.

I'm also a little dismayed to read the comments LT made here. He is planning to "education" the public? (hope that isn't the PH writing elves making a mistake because if it is, you've made LT look like a cretin) Apparently, rival cars are "sh*t". Doesn't sound like the words of the serious businessman many hoped he would be in this space, deeply unprofessional and hardly likely to help some buyers inevitable concerns about buying from a such a small company and their capabilities and prospects.

I remain hopeful and optimistic but a little concerned now about Ginetta long term. I mean, there is even the Artega they have to contend with, run by ex VW execs and somewhat more professionally finished. I don't particularly remember any quotes from their execs saying:

"We will sell many Artegas once we have informationised the buying public, that way they will know that the Porsche Cayman is for tts".

Hubert K

58 posts

155 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
cathalm said:
While this car looks good (did as a Farbio too)I just can't see that it will be a commercial success. Sure it's all lightweight now and many changes have been made but how can it stand up in the face of the competition? Setting Porsches aside since this is hardly comparable in terms of comforts and even discounting the Evora for the same reason the car is aimed at folks who want the stripped out drivers car thing. Fine for low volume but can anybody tell me why significant numbers of people would buy this over the new V6 Exige? It is less powerful, slower and a third again as expensive. Just can't see what it offers over that car at all and with such a price differential LT is looking at a financial disaster here.
Audi vs. BMW vs. Mercedes, R8 vs Gallardo it´s all the same. Were a Veyron worth it, if it wouldn´t be a Bugatti, (so it´s a Volkswagen at all)?
People buying cars for different reasons. Maybe it´s worth some people to pay 5k more for having a star on hood or pedigree like sh***y Maserati (owned one, hated it). I think Ginetta has got a excellent reputation in motorsport, so they will do fine with people interested in very special cars. I am very sure there is a market for 50 G60s a year. There are some of my friends waiting for G60 beeing bored by their Porsches ans Audis. But if reputation gone you can offer a Veyron for 100k, noone would buy it(in Germany, maybe in GB it´s a different story?! Don´t know)!!!









Edited by Hubert K on Monday 17th October 12:20


Edited by Hubert K on Monday 17th October 12:28

Tom74TVR

169 posts

158 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
Hubert K said:
There was a white LHD one in Belgium I drove in 2009. This car was built very well with fantastic handling on Belgium roads. Unfortunately there was a lack of power (262BHP) and I decided to order a 350BHP version.


Edited by Hubert K on Monday 17th October 11:58
Are you talking about the Farbio @TVR Belgium, Mark's car?

Hubert K

58 posts

155 months

Monday 17th October 2011
quotequote all
Tom74TVR said:
Hubert K said:
There was a white LHD one in Belgium I drove in 2009. This car was built very well with fantastic handling on Belgium roads. Unfortunately there was a lack of power (262BHP) and I decided to order a 350BHP version.


Edited by Hubert K on Monday 17th October 11:58
Are you talking about the Farbio @TVR Belgium, Mark's car?
Yes, you know it ? I liked it, except the exhaust sound inside and the very hard to push pedal for accelleration