RE: Nissan GT-R 2012: More For Less (Fuel)
Discussion
Risotto said:
Froomee said:
Some minor improvements all round, I have never understood why more manufacturers don't go down this route if the initial model is successful. Some cars are a great design to start with so why not keep the same principles but improve them.
I agree, but when you look at other manufacturers who follow this principle, it's easy to see why more don't do it. Take the 911 for example - look at how many people ON PISTONHEADS slate each new iteration for being unimaginative and lazy! (EVEN THOUGH A LOT OF PEOPLE ON HERE ALSO OWN ONE)W8PMC said:
Froomee said:
Just to clarify to all of those who commented I was being sarcastic hence the roll eyes.......in an attempt to stop this thread from descending into another farce
If you read the bottom of my post you will see that I said its a nice car and the only thing I don't like is the look which is subjective.
If you can afford a £75k car I doubt you will be worried about the petrol and consumables and lets face it the costs are relative to the performance.
I retract my response then. Has been a long day & i read your post in the opposite way The sarcasm went over my head;) If you read the bottom of my post you will see that I said its a nice car and the only thing I don't like is the look which is subjective.
If you can afford a £75k car I doubt you will be worried about the petrol and consumables and lets face it the costs are relative to the performance.
Godzilla said:
Price has already been announced for the standard version for the UK: £74,495.
No news on Track Pack until December. I would love a Track Pack version, but retaining the rear seats. They weigh virtually nothing anyway and come in very useful on occasion, particularly with 2 kids.
I could be selling my 2 cars and getting one of these ! No news on Track Pack until December. I would love a Track Pack version, but retaining the rear seats. They weigh virtually nothing anyway and come in very useful on occasion, particularly with 2 kids.
Stew2000 said:
DeanR32 said:
A bit OT, but what do you lot reckon is the best looking Skyline/GTR?
Depends if you want nostalgia. I think the R32.That said, I also like the classic "Hakosuka", but have never seen one in-person (I don't think there even are any in the 'States.)
Friggerpants said:
Stew2000 said:
It's not really a porsche thing.
That picture is beautiful.Have you got a higher resolution one please?
http://s3.amazonaws.com/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_lsj...
The R33 is the most common around my area.
j_s14a said:
I like the GTR, it allows completely unskilled drivers to drive quickly
Badge snobbery aside, the GTR is a ridiculously amazing car, and I doubt if many of its owners are that bothered about being 'unskilled' if it means they can comprehensively humiliate / annihilate pretty much every other performance car on the road. In any case, in the hands of skilled drivers, it's even better - who's doing all the work when Nissan's drivers (or someone like Horst Von Sauma) sets yet another stunning 'Ring time?I know your original comment was probably tongue-in-cheek, but I'll bite and make a serious point. No matter how much technology it's packing, a car still needs to be driven by a human. To my knowledge the car that truly drives itself has yet to be invented. So a GTR doesn't drive itself, and it has it's limits - if you overcook it, you can crash, get hurt and die in it just like in any other car. I accept that the Nissan's technology flatters the driver, but surely similar technology flatters the drivers of Ferrari 458s or 599GTOs? These cars are like Eurofighters, in that they're designed to be faster and more driveable through technology - so why keep bashing Nissan alone? Is it really such a crime to produce what's got to be, in relative terms, the most affordable and capable performance car ever made? (Note that I'm not saying it's the best performance car ever, because that's purely subjective and an unwinnable debate!)
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff