Worst car ever made and sold in the UK?

Worst car ever made and sold in the UK?

Author
Discussion

LuS1fer

41,138 posts

246 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
My first car was a 13 year old Austin A40 and the A-Series 1098cc engine in that took 2 years of utter abuse without complaint. Even when it froze, it just knocked the core plugs out - tapped them bak in, refilled adn away it went. It did blow a head gasket on one occasion but it took about an hour or two to change.

Engines were tougher beck then though. I had a Mk 1 Cortina 1200 which I drove from Cardiff to Chester constantly running out of water and was refilling it from any river I came across. Proved to be a duff radiator cap but the A-Series was way mor characterful.

I confess that a friend of mine bought an Escort Mk 3 1100 and that cetainly had to be right up there with the worst cars ever made with it's incredibly heavy, numb rubber steering and the turgid dynamics of a sack of lead potatoes with no redeeming features at all.

lowdrag

12,899 posts

214 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
I've had quite a few cars over 40+ years, but two that stand out were the Marina - drum brakes with no servo, wipers set up for LHD - and for the disastrous gearchange the Maxi. The Marina I pranged on the second day when I couldn't stop quick enough and went into the back of a lorry. The best was a W124 Mercedes. Went for years and years and was still running well when I sold it with 220,000 on the clock. I just got bored with it.

Steffan

10,362 posts

229 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
lowdrag said:
I've had quite a few cars over 40+ years, but two that stand out were the Marina - drum brakes with no servo, wipers set up for LHD - and for the disastrous gearchange the Maxi. The Marina I pranged on the second day when I couldn't stop quick enough and went into the back of a lorry. The best was a W124 Mercedes. Went for years and years and was still running well when I sold it with 220,000 on the clock. I just got bored with it.
My experience entirely reflects yours.

The last models from BLMH BMC Leyland or whatever it transmogrified into were dire in the extreme. The designs (?) were dreadful the quality control literally non existent.

In the end I switched to Audi, VW and Volve.

Sold my last Audi diesel A4 with 568,000 miles on ON$E engine. Never even replaced the motor once. Had 6 cam belt changes two clutches one alternator all the electrics still worked including the sunroof, windows. alarm, central locking and the stereo. Perfect.

Similarly my last Volvo S40 2 litre petrol sold at 268000 miles not a fault everything worked not a trace of rust though it was ten year old then.

Just the way it is now.

Of all the tragedies in British motoring history the unremitting waste of the advances that Issigonis. Leonard Lord and others created with the Morris Minor and then the Mini made in British car manufacture were revolutionary.

They put British motoring manufacturing right at the forefront of automobile design.

There never has been a better very small car than the Mini. To this day.

All wasted entirely over the next twenty years.




Fire99

9,844 posts

230 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Steffan said:
Of all the tragedies in British motoring history the unremitting waste of the advances that Issigonis. Leonard Lord and others created with the Morris Minor and then the Mini made in British car manufacture were revolutionary.

They put British motoring manufacturing right at the forefront of automobile design.

There never has been a better very small car than the Mini. To this day.

All wasted entirely over the next twenty years.

yes We had amazing innovators but managed to screw it up by making our car manufacturing industry pretty much a joke.


sparkyhx

4,152 posts

205 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
U T said:
Nope, sorry. You've gone in with Morris Ital, but I'm going to have to raise you with Austin Ambassador. The Morris Ital was indeed a lazy facelift of a rubbish car, the Marina, but the Ambassador was an even lazier facelift of an even worse car, the Princess.

I rest my case for the prosecution.

The Ambassador was referred to as the car the Princess should have been.

It also had a hatch rather than a boot, so not a small facelift.

Also its design was pretty striking (as were the workers) in its day

I like em

LuS1fer

41,138 posts

246 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
sparkyhx said:
The Ambassador was referred to as the car the Princess should have been.
My mate had an older gold Ambassador 2.0 and it was extremely reliable despite him calling it "Kevin". My father had a Princess 2 2200 HLS and it was also extremely reliable and had no quality issues at all. They weren't all bad.

In fact I was quite surprised the Ambassador didn't sell more as it was vast inside and not a bad looker but I guess the dull name didn't help.

The Princess was also pretty advanced in having a transverse 6 inherited from the old 2200 of the 60s.

Volvo360

8,202 posts

152 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
I'm going to suggest something a bit more modern... the original Vauxhall Frontera. Reliability, performance, image, and consistently low JD Power scores by owners count against it.

I used to supply QA inspection kit to car plants back then, the IBC factory where they were made in Luton was worse than stuff I saw in the 3rd world, happy days....
Was the Sintra made there too?

0a

23,901 posts

195 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
aw51 121565 said:
Strongly agree, the A-Series is a good 'un - punches well above its weight. The 1.6 in a Maestro was either an R-Series or an S-Series though wink . S-Series was good - "the thinking man's engine" the blurb called it, and it just went on and on with oil leaks - but the R-Series inherited fragility from the E-Series in the Allegro and Maxi (head gasket failure, for example).
....
My first thought was to name the Maestro (the parents had one in the 80s). However on reflection it didn’t break down, went from 5k to 100k miles before the clutch went (mainly driven by my mother!) and took us on numerous holidays in a comfortable enough manner. It was cheap to buy as well and had a funky grey velour interior.

Yes the arches went early on and needed botching. The door handles lasted a couple of winters (brittle plastic), the heater broke repeatedly, and the thing wasn’t very economical and was slow (1.3L). However it wasn’t the worst car ever built by the UK, I suspect.

LuS1fer

41,138 posts

246 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Volvo360 said:
Was the Sintra made there too?
Wasn't that American made?

mikey77

707 posts

189 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Ahhh, you youngsters...

I had two Princesses, they were ok.
I had a Wartburg Knight (how many others on here can say that?) and I still remember it fondly.

The worst Brit-made and sold motor I ever came across was called a Rodley.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodley

JR

12,722 posts

259 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
mikey77 said:
The worst Brit-made and sold motor I ever came across was called a Rodley.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rodley
Winner!

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

30,260 posts

236 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
BuzzLightyear said:
In fairness, it depends how you read the OPs question. It could either be
A) the worst car that was both made and sold in the UK, or
B) the worst car made (anywhere) that was sold in the UK.
I assume from the OPs later post that he actually meant B.

HTH

BL (no relation!)
Eats shoots & leaves

The Wookie

13,964 posts

229 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
The escort Mk6

Take the already quite st escort Mk5 and make it a bit worse in all ways and then model the front on a dead fish
To be fair I bought a diesel one for 140 quid off ebay for a stag weekend and it was no-where near as terrible as I expected. Yes it was dull and unspectacular in any way, but nothing about was subjectively offensive enough to be considered awful.

Plus it did a good two hours running around brunters with a dead battery, and then managed a trip to Cornwall and back afterwards!

I'm not sure if my vote is valid, as I believe the bulk of it was manufactured in India:



Rubbish reviews, rubbish rebadging exercise, rubbish to drive, rubbish build quality, overpriced, generally irredeemable. They predictably sold about five.

Volvo360

8,202 posts

152 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
mikey77 said:
I had a Wartburg Knight (how many others on here can say that?)
Me. A brown estate. Wonderful car.

vit4

3,507 posts

171 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
I'm going to suggest something a bit more modern... the original Vauxhall Frontera. Reliability, performance, image, and consistently low JD Power scores by owners count against it.

I used to supply QA inspection kit to car plants back then, the IBC factory where they were made in Luton was worse than stuff I saw in the 3rd world, happy days....
Whilst I understand the bad press Fronteras get, I've got to say my mate had one which was pretty much indestructible... Although his was an earlier one with the Isuzu diesel. Were the later ones the issue or was he just lucky?

otolith

56,198 posts

205 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
I had an Ital and a Maestro and drove a Montego a fair bit. Oh, and a Metro at one point too. The Ital was certainly the worst of them. It was my first car. The only good thing I remember about it - apart from it being preferable to walking or getting the bus - was that there was a well sighted uphill bend near my house that was always covered in loose gravel, and I used to enjoy giving it a bootful of throttle half way round it. Until I tried the same thing on the wet and greasy road to Whitby, and ended up neatly parked in a layby on the other side of the road. Crap tyres or crap suspension, probably both, it certainly didn't have enough power to justify being so tail happy.

joewilliams

2,004 posts

202 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
The Wookie said:


Rubbish reviews, rubbish rebadging exercise, rubbish to drive, rubbish build quality, overpriced, generally irredeemable. They predictably sold about five.
The best bit is the little Union Jack enamel badge on the bootlid. That'll fool 'em!

Tyson1980

712 posts

157 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Chrysler Sebring

jamiebae

6,245 posts

212 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
LuS1fer said:
Volvo360 said:
Was the Sintra made there too?
Wasn't that American made?
Made in the States IIRC, a rush job, as GM realised they didn't have an MPV product.
And hurriedly discontinued when Euro NCAP pointed there was a genuine risk of passenger decapitation in the event of an accident which would be survivable in even a Rover 100...

bqf

2,231 posts

172 months

Thursday 24th November 2011
quotequote all
The Metro - all variants, except the 6R4 rally version.

I had one, and it was appalling. Ugly, uncomfortable, slow, unreliable, badly designed, horrid. Truly horrid - it besmirches the good name of the Mini, and for that reason alone should be erased from history.