Worst car ever made and sold in the UK?

Worst car ever made and sold in the UK?

Author
Discussion

sparkyhx

4,152 posts

205 months

Thursday 24th November 2011
quotequote all
Volvo360 said:
mikey77 said:
I had a Wartburg Knight (how many others on here can say that?)
Me. A brown estate. Wonderful car.
off topic cos not GB - but weren't these 2 stroke engines? bit like the trabant (but at the front)

Steffan

10,362 posts

229 months

Thursday 24th November 2011
quotequote all
sparkyhx said:
Volvo360 said:
mikey77 said:
I had a Wartburg Knight (how many others on here can say that?)
Me. A brown estate. Wonderful car.
off topic cos not GB - but weren't these 2 stroke engines? bit like the trabant (but at the front)
The original Warturg were two strokes From memory possibly 3 cylinder.

Clouds of blue smoke confirmed this every time they started.

Awful car I think the two stroke was dropped because of emissions problem.

I think the importer gave up. Sensibly.

tali1

5,267 posts

202 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
bqf said:
The Metro - all variants, except the 6R4 rally version.

I had one, and it was appalling. Ugly, uncomfortable, slow, unreliable, badly designed, horrid. Truly horrid - it besmirches the good name of the Mini, and for that reason alone should be erased from history.
Although not the Rover version

Baz Tench

5,648 posts

191 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
bqf said:
The Metro - all variants, except the 6R4 rally version.

I had one, and it was appalling. Ugly, uncomfortable, slow, unreliable, badly designed, horrid. Truly horrid - it besmirches the good name of the Mini, and for that reason alone should be erased from history.
I learnt to drive in one, a 1982 X reg 1.0L. I dreamed of owning a 1.3HLE once I'd passed my test....hehe

Chicharito

1,017 posts

152 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
jas xjr said:
+1 for the Talbot avenger. Truly truly awful. Drove a new one and struggled to find neutral
Hmmm, they actually handle better than the much worshipped MkII Escort.

Some really odd opinions in here. I must be getting old, as some of the cars mentioned I actually remember as being pretty decent compared with their peers. It's only in a modern day context that they look bad.

Things like the Ambassador were very competent and comfortable, but let down by quality issues. They were a quantum leap ahead of the competition from Ford etc.

Same with the Horizon. It showed us a glimpse of the future when everyone was driving Chevettes.

Chicharito

1,017 posts

152 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
moffspeed said:
Mk 6 Escort RS2000 - probably just an averagely bad car until you add the RS prefix - an unforgiveable defamation of everything that had borne the title beforehand...
Sorry, but they were damned good and a proper RS. More of and RS than the Series 2 RS Turbo.

LordHaveMurci

12,045 posts

170 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
Mr serge said:
got to be the morris ital
Did many miles in a Company Ital estate with 175k miles, hated every one! Was delighted to get a Cavalier as a replacement, that's how bad it was!

deeen

6,081 posts

246 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
I'm having an attack of "Notsureifserious"

Horizon - based on Simca 1100 from the 1960s, a step below the Maxi, or 10 steps below the Renault 16
Avenger - based on Hillman Hunter from the 1960s, a worthy competitor to the Marina
Metro? Different car cos it had a Rover badge? Really?

Is it me?

Chicharito

1,017 posts

152 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
deeen said:
I'm having an attack of "Notsureifserious"

Horizon - based on Simca 1100 from the 1960s, a step below the Maxi, or 10 steps below the Renault 16
Avenger - based on Hillman Hunter from the 1960s, a worthy competitor to the Marina
Metro? Different car cos it had a Rover badge? Really?

Is it me?
Yes, it is.

Don't know where you're getting your info. from, but you're completely wrong.

Avenger was a new platform which was shortened for the Sunbeam.

The Horizon was a shortened Alpine....

And the K-series re-engineering of the Metro transformed the car.

fluffnik

20,156 posts

228 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
2 sMoKiN bArReLs said:
LuS1fer said:
Talbot Avenger - so old it could be carbon-dated
scratchchin not sure how many of them were made in blighty?
The Avenger was.

...but it was quite good:
  • properly located rear axle, unlike a Marina/Ital
  • snikity gear box, unlike a Marina/Ital
  • free revving motor, unlike a Marina/Ital
  • half decent telescopic dampers, unlike a Marina/Ital
  • communicative steering, unlike a Marina/Ital
The Avenger chassis was pretty decent, especially in Tiger/Sunbeam Lotus guise. I'd sooner have one than an Escort.

fluffnik

20,156 posts

228 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
jas xjr said:
+1 for the Talbot avenger. Truly truly awful. Drove a new one and struggled to find neutral
confused

My Mum bought an ex plod 1600 the day before its first MoT was due with 115,000 miles on it.

The gearbox was slick and snickity.

She passed it on to me three years later with ~140k on the clock.

The gearbox was slick and snickity.

I kept it for a couple of years and sold it with ~160k when it needed some welding.

The gearbox was slick and snickity.



B'stard Child

28,444 posts

247 months

Monday 28th November 2011
quotequote all
Talbot Alpine

rat a tat a tat a tat a tat a tat from new (or mins after you left the showroom)

Never owned one - just drove one once and it drove ok but a neighbour had one and you heard the noise from the valve gear long before you saw the car - bit like a modern diesel really

I'd add a vote for the Montego drove two and both can be described as "interesting"

- 1st one Auto 1.3 poverty spec and everytime the gearbox kicked down the bonnet released and the glovebox fell open

- 2nd one MG Montego Turbo and I'd nearly forgive it everything for the way it went except the gearbox ratios were frankly shocking - 1st gear - woosh grab 2nd - woosh hit the limiter - grab third burrrrrrrrrrrrr and eventually just when you'd almost got bored waiting - woosh and off you went again

fluffnik

20,156 posts

228 months

Tuesday 29th November 2011
quotequote all
deeen said:
Avenger - based on Hillman Hunter from the 1960s, a worthy competitor to the Marina
nono

The Avenger had a well located coil sprung rear axle, telescopic dampers and a front ARB, a far superior chassis to the Marina or contemporary Fords.

The high cam OHV engine was free revving and noticeably less thrashy than it its contemporaries, the gearbox slick.

The Avenger was getting rather long in the tooth by the end but it had one of the better live axle chassis even then...

LuS1fer

41,138 posts

246 months

Tuesday 29th November 2011
quotequote all
fluffnik said:
nono

The Avenger had a well located coil sprung rear axle, telescopic dampers and a front ARB, a far superior chassis to the Marina or contemporary Fords.

The high cam OHV engine was free revving and noticeably less thrashy than it its contemporaries, the gearbox slick.

The Avenger was getting rather long in the tooth by the end but it had one of the better live axle chassis even then...
Yes, I understand all this. A friend of mine had an Avenger 1500GT and traded it for a Marina TC which was a bad move. My inclusion of the later Avenger is based on one thing - LOOK AT IT! Stupid stuck on rear bits at the back, ghastly rear lights, the horrid nose - they deserve a kicking for trying to make it look like a Chrysler. Yuk. As you were...

jamiebae

6,245 posts

212 months

Tuesday 29th November 2011
quotequote all
Was the Metro really that bad a car? Compared to its contemporaries in the early 80s it was pretty good, likewise the 'Roverised' version was great fun to drive and not bad compared to the AX, Nova and such. Sure, the A series one was long in the tooth by 1989 it was still far from the worst car you could buy.

Reardy Mister

13,757 posts

223 months

Tuesday 29th November 2011
quotequote all


Sentimental 80s kids films aside....


Carparticus

1,038 posts

203 months

Tuesday 29th November 2011
quotequote all

GuitarTech

582 posts

151 months

Tuesday 29th November 2011
quotequote all
sparkyhx said:
off topic cos not GB - but weren't these 2 stroke engines? bit like the trabant (but at the front)
Yep, for most of its life it had a 3-cylinder 2-stroke, which was a slightly improved version of the motor from DKW, a car-maker that was taken over by Audi, I think: Front-mounted, rear wheel drive.
Right at the end, (after the German reunification),in a last-ditch attempt to modernize it, they re-engined it with a 1.3L 4-Stroke engine from VW, not sure whether Polo or Golf. Never sold many though, and the company went bust soon after that.
The 3-cylinder wasn't all that bad actually, they even used a tuned version for the Melkus racer, it was certainly streets ahead of the 2-cylinder 2-stroke in the Trabant, (which incidently was front-mounted too)
They also used the old engine in east Germanys jack-of-all-trades transporter: The Barkus, about the size of an old Bedford van.
the only car they ever imported the England was the Wartburg: The local copper that used to live over the road from us had one for years. years later I had a Saab, also with a 3-cylinder 2-Stroke, but I digress, getting OT here....

tamore

6,986 posts

285 months

Tuesday 29th November 2011
quotequote all
Carparticus said:
is that a photo of the production line?

Carparticus

1,038 posts

203 months

Tuesday 29th November 2011
quotequote all
tamore said:
Carparticus said:
is that a photo of the production line?


It was actually awaiting customer collection. Red Robbo and his comrades would be there to hand it over, and spanner any customer who kicked up a fuss about the car being a piece of shrapnel, and rusting before its even been collected.