Vauxhall frontera 2.0

Author
Discussion

RESSE

5,705 posts

222 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
I ran a 3.2 Sport for a few months and it was a huge improvement over an earlier 2.0 Sport (1993/K plate model year - this was utter c**p but was leased to me and eventually returned to Mann Egerton Lease due to mechanical failures).

Not many V6 Sports were made, but I remember Off Road & 4 Wheel Drive Magazine gave it a 'thumbs up' and it was cheap, reliable and not bad to drive.

Very inexpensive to buy now.

I put some B F Goodrich All Terrain tyres on and it was good offroad.

However the 3.2 soon went and made way for this:


300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Melvin Udall said:
300... Did defenders not come with open diffs? I must say, I never had an issue getting stuck, except for when I ended up down a snow filled ditch. Never got stuck in mud, or out on the trails, etc. never got stuck in the Vitara either, despite being open diffs as well.
Landy's are open axle diffs too, I presume it was the suspension flex and articulation, or lack thereof in the Frontera that made the difference.

I'm honestly not hating on it - why would I, I'd have nothing to gain by it. But as a comparison from having driven a number of different 4x4's in varied conditions and terrain, sadly the Frontera was the worst performing of all of them. If it had rode and handled better on the road I could have forgiven it this, but in fact it actually rode and handled worse. So I was always rather confused to what the designers where thinking exactly when designed the vehicle. hehe

Melvin Udall

73,668 posts

256 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Landy's are open axle diffs too, I presume it was the suspension flex and articulation, or lack thereof in the Frontera that made the difference.

I'm honestly not hating on it - why would I, I'd have nothing to gain by it. But as a comparison from having driven a number of different 4x4's in varied conditions and terrain, sadly the Frontera was the worst performing of all of them. If it had rode and handled better on the road I could have forgiven it this, but in fact it actually rode and handled worse. So I was always rather confused to what the designers where thinking exactly when designed the vehicle. hehe
Not saying you're hating. Just telling it from my experience. The earlier Fronteras were solid front axle by the way. Oddly enough, the stock frontera won the Baha stock category, so clearly can't be all that bad, and certainly isn't from my experience.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
The Moose said:
Are these any good, or are they pretty crappy?

Looking at a swb (2 door) 2 litre manual from 1997 or 1998.

Just fancy a change of car and saw this. As I say, any good?
Possibly because I've already had opportunity to do many many miles in a Frontera, so been there done that sort of thing. But Personally I'd look for a Ford Maverick (Nissan Terrano is the same, but some reason fetches more money rolleyes ) as a cheap winter 4x4.



Edited by 300bhp/ton on Wednesday 23 November 13:07

JM

3,170 posts

207 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Fronteras are apparantly good at getting up Snowden, not so good at coming down though.

Sure I read that somewhere...............

andy-xr

13,204 posts

205 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
I had one, impulse buy for the winter. Found a local one with silly tyres, no idea how it passed it's MOT with the sills the way they were when I had it, that rust didn't just occur in 4 months since the test

It wasn't fast, topped out at mid 70's but I'd put that down to the tyres that were on it and that it was the 8v engine. Offroad it was a mini monster, though I only properly had it off road twice.

Usual VX interiors, seats looked like they'd come out of or were shared with a Nova but worked fine.

Melvin Udall

73,668 posts

256 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke said:
Melvin Udall said:
Tyre Smoke said:
You mean an Isuzu Trooper then.

I think your thread might be over there -------------->

This is about Fronteras.
Fronteras came with the 3.2 as well.
Really? I can honestly say I've never seen one.

Loads of those Troopers and their Vx equivalents though.
Here's one...

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/used-cars/vauxhall/fro...

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Melvin Udall said:
Not saying you're hating. Just telling it from my experience. The earlier Fronteras were solid front axle by the way. Oddly enough, the stock frontera won the Baha stock category, so clearly can't be all that bad, and certainly isn't from my experience.
Didn't know they had a live front axle on earlier ones. Interesting. smile

And yeah, I'm sure they can be capable, as you say you've experienced it so I'm happy to concede that. Love the colour of your one biggrin it seems familiar.

Tommy Saxondale

1,357 posts

195 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
had a LWB 2.3 derv one a couple of years ago, paid 400 quid for it whilst my landrover was off the road. was superb in the snow on some nice fat BF goodrich A/T's took it to a pay and play and it seemed to do well there too, waded up to the bonnet without trouble.

Melvin Udall

73,668 posts

256 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
I could be wrong about the live axle, can't remember. Been some years since I had it, or was on planetisuzu. Maybe I was thinking about the trooper? Nnnnng.

Presuming Ed

1,402 posts

209 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
The first gen models are truely awful on road and were plain nasty to drive. The second gen were actually rather good. Fantastic off road and ok on it. I'd go for a 3.2V6 auto LWB.

Amused2death

2,493 posts

197 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
I swapped a Golf GTI for this, 3.2L V6, 15mpg at best smile
It's the Jap/USA version called the Isuzu Rodeo.



Loved driving it but couldn't deal with the fuel consumption so it was sold.
Few years later and I got this one.(Excuse the extremely crap picture)
2.3 Diesel, slow, noisy, but it would go anywhere I wanted it to, and it didn't matter if it got dented, just added to the character.


Melvin Udall

73,668 posts

256 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Honda also had a version of it called the Passport.


Big Rod

6,200 posts

217 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Tyre Smoke said:
Melvin Udall said:
Tyre Smoke said:
You mean an Isuzu Trooper then.

I think your thread might be over there -------------->

This is about Fronteras.
Fronteras came with the 3.2 as well.
Really? I can honestly say I've never seen one.

Loads of those Troopers and their Vx equivalents though.
Yup, 3.2 litre 24v petrol V6. It was an Isuzu lump in it though.



RESSE

5,705 posts

222 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Sport 3.2:

Maximum power:
205PS at 5400rpm and maximum torque of 290 Nm (214 lb. ft) at 3000rpm.

Towing:
Maximum towing weight of 2400 kg. Trailer noseweight is 112 kg. Unladen weight is 1786 kg.

Suspension:
Coil sprung, five-link rear suspension features an additional fifth transverse link to give greater axle location over the full range of travel.

dowahdiddyman

965 posts

212 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Many moons ago had a 1994 2.4 lwb petrol. Would go anywhere,usually the nearest petrol station, never got stuck in snow. Saw it about,still going strong(ish) only a couple of months ago.

The Moose

Original Poster:

22,864 posts

210 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
I must admit, I do kinda like the idea of the short wheel base with the removable rear section leaving you with the roll bar hehe

Is that bad? Where do I sign up for therapy?!

RESSE

5,705 posts

222 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Here are my old ones;

1993 = 2.0 Petrol/not so good on road, but great off it:


1998 - 3.2 V6 Petrol = drove well and made a nice sound:


For the money they are a reasonable purchase now? (the post 1998 models rather than the 1992-1998 versions)?

For some strange reason I like the old Fronteras boxedin
getmecoat

The Moose

Original Poster:

22,864 posts

210 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
I think it's a 1997 I'm off to see. Can't remember though...

I must say, I'm a little worried the 2.0 is going to be gutless. I guess I just need to try it and see...

Melvin Udall

73,668 posts

256 months

Wednesday 23rd November 2011
quotequote all
Well, it's no sportscar. I suppose it depends on expectation.