RE: Lotus goes hybrid

Author
Discussion

XitUp

7,690 posts

205 months

Thursday 15th December 2011
quotequote all
No they can't. I'm not sure where you've got that idea from.

There is one hydrogen filling station in the UK.
I'm not sure how many plug sockets there are, but I'm pretty sure it's more than that.

binberme

63 posts

224 months

Sunday 18th December 2011
quotequote all
This thing could give new meaning to the acronym

L.O.T.U.S......( Lots Of Trouble Usually Serious )...........

cheesyblob

370 posts

176 months

Sunday 18th December 2011
quotequote all
boobles said:
thewheelman said:
boobles said:
Mannginger said:
A £30k supermini?

eek

Presume that's like Aston's Cygnet? A sop to the EU manufacturer emissions rather than a serious vehicle?
yes This is correct.
Wrong! Lotus being a premium brand will bring more awareness to the Ethos EV globally than Proton ever could with their branded version. The Lotus Ethos could have impressive sales in America.
I was agreeing that the reason for the city car was to reduce emissions through out the range.
Aston Martin have done it aswel.

Edited by boobles on Tuesday 13th December 10:47
But Lotus is owned by Proton, and the emissions regulations are taken from all cars in the "company umbrella"

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

205 months

Sunday 18th December 2011
quotequote all
Pierscoe1 said:
the good bit about it is the fact that the car can be re-fuelled at a conventional petrol station (more-or-less)... which there is already the infastructure for, and that ranges (on the one I heard about, admittedly a while back) are comparable... meaning you could drive, re-fuel, drive again in the same way everyone does currently...
Okay maybe i'm weird but i don't drive, re-fuel, drive again, re-fuel etc and so on

I drive 20 miles to work park for 9 hours, drive 20 miles home park for 14 hours, drive 20 miles to work park for 4 hours drive 2 miles to the shop park for 30 minutes, drive 2 miles back to work, park for 4 hours, drive 20 miles home, park for a hour, drive 5 miles to the chip shop, park for 20 minutes, drive 5 miles home, park for 12 hours etc and so on for most of the week then at some point it is refuel, drive home and park for 14 hours

The vast majority of cars spend far more time parked then they do driving so the 8 hour recharge time isn't a huge issue. Unless you do a large amount of miles then buy a diesel car.

If you want a toy then buy a light petrol one

If you want to show how rich you are then buy a heavy petrol one.

Pierscoe1 said:
battery-electric cars currently are utterly useless becasue if I want to go visit family at the other side/end of the country, I have to stop overnight half-way, just to re-fuel. fuel-cell cars wouldn't suffer from this... although they obviously have plenty of other problems from what you've said....
The nissian leaf can recharge to 80% full in 30 minutes

Why do you have to stop overnight for a 30 minute charge

supersingle

3,205 posts

220 months

Sunday 18th December 2011
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
The nissian leaf can recharge to 80% full in 30 minutes

Why do you have to stop overnight for a 30 minute charge
Not from a 13amp socket it doesn't.

Most people do sometimes want to make longer journeys and unless they can afford to have two cars then pure EV is no good to them.

Maybe a plug-in petrol/electric would suit more poeple?

PaulG40

2,381 posts

226 months

Sunday 18th December 2011
quotequote all
Lotus have certainly got their green credentials ar*e about face! The UK may not be the centre of automotive salvation in context of the world market, and really we are being bombarded with green messages from our goverment but our economy simply cannot cope with its introduction just yet, just leave it to the Chinese and Japan to have it over there.

I personally think Ford are on the right track with their new smaller more frugal 1litre 3 cyl turbo engines that will be coming in soon, rather than putting all your eggs into the 'electric' revolution.

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

247 months

Sunday 18th December 2011
quotequote all
binberme said:
This thing could give new meaning to the acronym L.O.T.U.S.....
A note pinned by the charger switch,

Leave On To Use Saturday ?

boobles

15,241 posts

216 months

Sunday 18th December 2011
quotequote all
cheesyblob said:
boobles said:
thewheelman said:
boobles said:
Mannginger said:
A £30k supermini?

eek

Presume that's like Aston's Cygnet? A sop to the EU manufacturer emissions rather than a serious vehicle?
yes This is correct.
Wrong! Lotus being a premium brand will bring more awareness to the Ethos EV globally than Proton ever could with their branded version. The Lotus Ethos could have impressive sales in America.
I was agreeing that the reason for the city car was to reduce emissions through out the range.
Aston Martin have done it aswel.

Edited by boobles on Tuesday 13th December 10:47
But Lotus is owned by Proton, and the emissions regulations are taken from all cars in the "company umbrella"
Im can assure you that this is the reason... wink

davepoth

29,395 posts

200 months

Sunday 18th December 2011
quotequote all
Regarding the Hydrogen thing, it's uneconomical to extract, but if you pair it up with the other stupid science of widescale wind turbines, it suddenly becomes a lot more sensible; the power the wind turbines create when nobody needs it is used to produce hydrogen. When I get to be a dictator of a small island nation that's what I'm going to do anyway. smile

XitUp

7,690 posts

205 months

Sunday 18th December 2011
quotequote all
It's much more sensible to use the excess wind power to pump water up a hill to store in a reservoir. When you need electricity and there is not much wind you let some water flow down through a turbine.

supersingle said:
Not from a 13amp socket it doesn't.
Nope, but I bet there are more 3 phases charging points than hydrogen filling stations.

RTH

1,057 posts

213 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
There will be plenty of both when petrol & diesel get to £10 a litre.

1point7bar

1,305 posts

149 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
The stone age did not end because they ran out of stones.
Iron was better.
If they engineer something that outdoes the current crop of petrol & diesel vehicles, in all areas, then we will see real fleet turnover. The longer they don't manage this, the (insert your own word) (braver) the ecovehicle pioneers will appear.

RTH

1,057 posts

213 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
Every day the world consumes 91 million barrels of crude oil (210 litres/barrel) each year that goes up by another 2 million barrels a day and is accelerating in consumption. Oil is a finite substance that took billions of years to accumulate, increasingly hard to find.

http://omrpublic.iea.org/


As stocks get depleted / extraction gets far more expensive and at the same time world population has tripled in the last 60 years the price of oil will continue to climb steeply.
If you think petrol and diesel are expensive now, in 10 years time 2011 prices will look ridiculously cheap, at the same time your standard of living is very likely to have been reduced from now, and of course it will in time run out altogether.
Other forms of propulsion may not sound appealing, there may be no alternative.

1point7bar

1,305 posts

149 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
Bioethanol can replace fossil petrol, although grain is required. (Ensus plant mothballed). There will always be competition for the world's resources. Hopefully, money remains the means of exchange, as the alternatives are really few.
Luckily, oil consumption in the developing world is largely discretionary.

Edited by 1point7bar on Monday 19th December 20:00

XitUp

7,690 posts

205 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
Ethanol is rubbish. Biobutanol is what you want.

1point7bar

1,305 posts

149 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
XitUp said:
Ethanol is rubbish. Biobutanol is what you want.
Never heard of it.
Does it deliver more bhp/litre?

XitUp

7,690 posts

205 months

Monday 19th December 2011
quotequote all
Is that a serious question? Because it makes no sense.

1point7bar

1,305 posts

149 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
You are right, it is not clearly worded.
I meant energy density and have since Googled Biobutanol.
Seems promising.

XitUp

7,690 posts

205 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
Yeah, I thought you meant that, I was just being a dick. wink

It also won't rot fuel lines like ethanol.

Oilchange

8,468 posts

261 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
the ronin said:
Airbags and emmisions are among the reasons.... The hyped unproven HP is another...... As I said taking orders on five cars in the US that aren't road legal in the US is a joke...
This Lotus have nothing the US buyer wants at this time ...can they pawn off the rest of their production to China and survive ?
Are Lotus going to sell the Exige V6 in the US?
I wonder, do you speak for the entire American motoring population? Lotus don't have to sell that many cars compared to other manufacturers to stay solvent. The market is there for companies to exploit and why should Lotus not have a go? Why do you think their marketing is so wrong?
As for hybrids, Toyota sold quite a few Prius' after all and they're dull as ditchwater!