why do some cars have 2 reversing lights and others only 1?

why do some cars have 2 reversing lights and others only 1?

Author
Discussion

Jacobthechap

Original Poster:

38 posts

156 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
as the title say,

something i have noticed is that the more expensive the car the more likely it has 2 reversing lights?

just a weird thing i noticed...

hardcorehobbit

1,103 posts

195 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
My 99 Rover 400 has 2 reverse lights. So no, not just expensive cars.

One is the requirement, as is one foglight.

Thus, designers only bother with one of each to make it look 'better'.

Jacobthechap

Original Poster:

38 posts

156 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
a bit of symmetry is always nice..

cuprabob

14,627 posts

214 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
Most of the ones with one reversing light have the one fog light in the matching location in the driver's side cluster.

Not sure about the expense comment as Polo has 2 whereas my R32 and Scirocco each have one

TheDoggingFather

17,097 posts

206 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
I'm pretty sure you don't have to have reverse lights by law, they aren't part of an M.O.T.

Changedmyname

12,545 posts

181 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
Two of each here,Thank you!

Mave

8,208 posts

215 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
TheDoggingFather said:
I'm pretty sure you don't have to have reverse lights by law, they aren't part of an M.O.T.
Just because something isn't in the MoT, doesn't mean it isn't a legal requirement smile

KungFuPanda

4,333 posts

170 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
Although I have a space for a reverse light in each rear cluster of my S6, only one of them is avtivated. This has led to numerous people advising me that one of my reverse bulbs is out. Apparently, only vehicles for the Japanese market have both reverse lights activated.

TheDoggingFather

17,097 posts

206 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
Mave said:
TheDoggingFather said:
I'm pretty sure you don't have to have reverse lights by law, they aren't part of an M.O.T.
Just because something isn't in the MoT, doesn't mean it isn't a legal requirement smile
Well several of my Mini's don't have reverse lights smile

Mave

8,208 posts

215 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
TheDoggingFather said:
Well several of my Mini's don't have reverse lights smile
How old are they, and were they originally fitted with them? Construction and Use Regs now aren't the same as they used to be....

New POD

3,851 posts

150 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
Jacobthechap said:
as the title say,

something i have noticed is that the more expensive the car the more likely it has 2 reversing lights?

just a weird thing i noticed...
Cost. On a volvo S40 I Owned I noticed that one of the rear fog lights was out. So I bought a bulb, and found that all the wiring and the socket was in place, but the HOLE in the plastic had not been cut out. So with Stanley's knife I carefully removed said bit of plastic and fitted a second fog lamp bulb. I reckon they'd saved £0.25 p MAX

If they can get away with saving 1 Fog light bulb, 1 Reversing light bulb AND the wiring, then they'll be saving what ? £2 ?


When I worked for Garrett making Turbo's we started using special bolts with a shoulder instead of a washer, but the CHEAP bit was that the shoulder had a one use shape that cut it's own spot face into a cast alloy housing. At 50p per spot face, and 2p per washer, plus the associated costs of NOT buying the cutting tool or finding a washer supplier, multiplied by 6, I reckon they saved £3.12 per turbo. Now look at every little stting bit of your car, and think 12p saved there, 30p saved there, £2 saved there.

anonymous-user

54 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
You obviously have never bought a new car. When you buy one they ask you how much reversing you are likely to do after nightfall. You can then choose the extra light option (although i believe they take away one of the cupholders to balance the cost of the extra light........... ;-)

TheDoggingFather

17,097 posts

206 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
Mave said:
TheDoggingFather said:
Well several of my Mini's don't have reverse lights smile
How old are they, and were they originally fitted with them? Construction and Use Regs now aren't the same as they used to be....
Newest is '76 but they did continue through to the mid-80's without them.

Codswallop

5,250 posts

194 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
My car is posh - not only does it have two reversing lights, but it also has two rear fog lights party

Astra Dan

1,675 posts

184 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
Codswallop said:
My car is posh - not only does it have two reversing lights, but it also has two rear fog lights party
You heard it here! Astras are posh!

surveyor

17,825 posts

184 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
New POD said:
Cost. On a volvo S40 I Owned I noticed that one of the rear fog lights was out. So I bought a bulb, and found that all the wiring and the socket was in place, but the HOLE in the plastic had not been cut out. So with Stanley's knife I carefully removed said bit of plastic and fitted a second fog lamp bulb. I reckon they'd saved £0.25 p MAX

If they can get away with saving 1 Fog light bulb, 1 Reversing light bulb AND the wiring, then they'll be saving what ? £2 ?


When I worked for Garrett making Turbo's we started using special bolts with a shoulder instead of a washer, but the CHEAP bit was that the shoulder had a one use shape that cut it's own spot face into a cast alloy housing. At 50p per spot face, and 2p per washer, plus the associated costs of NOT buying the cutting tool or finding a washer supplier, multiplied by 6, I reckon they saved £3.12 per turbo. Now look at every little stting bit of your car, and think 12p saved there, 30p saved there, £2 saved there.
No. The logic is a single light helps differentiate between brake lights which are similarly bright. Allegedly. Probably different rules elsewhere hence the reason that they can be activated easily.

mrmr96

13,736 posts

204 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
Maybe it's because in some markets you don't need a rear fog light (e.g. Japan) but in the UK you do. Therefore sometimes one of the reversing lights is converted to being a fog light. Not sure about typically expensive/cheap but it could be typically Euro/Jap. (For example)

BOR

4,702 posts

255 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
A symetric light cluster avoids the logistics complexity of having different set ups for different markets.

Mave

8,208 posts

215 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
TheDoggingFather said:
Newest is '76 but they did continue through to the mid-80's without them.
Well, a reversing light is a requirement of IVA, so I can't imagine it's not a requirement of Type Approval for high volume cars.

Fetchez la vache

5,572 posts

214 months

Tuesday 13th December 2011
quotequote all
Mave said:
TheDoggingFather said:
Well several of my Mini's don't have reverse lights smile
How old are they, and were they originally fitted with them? Construction and Use Regs now aren't the same as they used to be....
Yep, my 1972 beach buggy had no reverse lights.. fog lights... wing mirrors...