RE: PH Blog: all you need

RE: PH Blog: all you need

Author
Discussion

vjj

592 posts

240 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
Not only was this article authentic westcountry gibberish, it was written with great feeling - I am moved to tears.

ewenm

28,506 posts

246 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
Dagnut said:
If you want a light nimble buy a sports car not a saloon...are you really trying to tell us if your travelling 200 miles in a car you wouldn't rather be mashing the tarmac into submission in an AMG merc ?
What you save on depreciation and initial layout, easily covers the extra spend on fuel...I'm all for lightweight cars but if it's a saloon give me massive torque and comfort anyday
So a big diesel barge would be even better for the job than an AMG Merc then?

Dagnut

3,515 posts

194 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
ewenm said:
So a big diesel barge would be even better for the job than an AMG Merc then?
No it wouldn't...usable power and torque...should of specified that

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
Interesting article given the recent threads on here.


JMF894

5,510 posts

156 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
Couldn't agree more here.

My daily driver-MK1 Octavia vRS with remap (approx 210-220bhp and 232lb/ft)

It gives me 40 plus mpg on a steady daily commute, has a large boot, is quick enough to make progress even when fully loaded on holiday etc etc.

Weekend- TVR 450se

Crusoe

4,068 posts

232 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
Most drive the same roads regularly at similar pace no matter what car they are in, might go a bit quicker in the corners in something light and sporty but usually restricted by visibility and when a straight does open out usually lift off before you get into license loosing speeds or because there is other traffic. Lucky to live near some nice rural roads but A to B the wife’s 120d is almost as quick as my M3 so swapped for a 130i. You miss out on some of the acceleration and sound track and there is something to be said for more torque than grip for low speed fun even if you aren’t using the performance to go faster.

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

251 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
And, as if by magic, the original Elise; 725kg, 118bhp = 162.75 bhp.


CocoPops

463 posts

232 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
TonyHetherington said:
And, as if by magic, the original Elise; 725kg, 118bhp = 162.75 bhp.
VX220.

147bhp/875kg

= 168 smile

Ooops, I've just supercharged mine... aiming for 250-260bhp which would give 285-297bhp/Ton


loudlashadjuster

5,130 posts

185 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
Funnily enough, the car I've owned that I consider to have had the best blend of useable performance was my Lancer GSR, not the considerably more powerful Evo that followed.

At 190hp and 1170kg it works out as having had 162.4hp/tonne - spooky - and all on 195/205 tyres that allowed for predictable hoonage where weight transfer could be enjoyed rather than pummelled into submission by overwhelming mechanical grip.

newdogg06

266 posts

190 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
Strong drivers, Passats. Mine's still good at 172k, uses little oil and still returns and easy 50mpg. Worth a re-map without question.

CHIEF

2,270 posts

283 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
I own a similar wallowy old Passat albeit the 130 version, Whilst it wafts along quite nice and has a surprisingly punchy midrange which is good for overtaking - sometimes, just sometimes I wish that instant wallop of midrange lasted a bit longer, You do have to totally change your driving style compared to say a 2 litre petrol.

Whether the 100bhp is enough is open to debate but mine at legal motorway speeds is right in the 'meat' of its midrange and feels more than its 130 bhp suggests, of course this is all down to its torque.

I do wish it could take a corner though lol.

Going back to power and driving, I think we get carried away with the power war now and its becoming increasingly frustrated when you cannot use even 50% of power on the road.

In fact I mentioned it here on my thread, You dont need 500bhp to have fun.

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

Dakkon

7,826 posts

254 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
AndyCzech said:
I may well accept less than 163 in a lighter car that has near perfect balance.

It’s sad that many modern barges need more power simply to overcome excess weight. As you rightly say that doesn’t always add up to a car that is fun to drive.
I am not sure I follow, 163bhp per tonne is based on the weight and power.....a heavier car will need more power to reach the same ratio?

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

251 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
CocoPops said:
VX220.
147bhp/875kg
= 168 smile
Indeed. Or, another way of putting it, 5 away from perfection hehe


(I had a 111S and an Exige S - so wasn't lucky enough to have an original Elise, but spent a lot of time in my cousin's and I agree - it's a nice point of performance vs useability)

ewenm

28,506 posts

246 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
Dakkon said:
AndyCzech said:
I may well accept less than 163 in a lighter car that has near perfect balance.

It’s sad that many modern barges need more power simply to overcome excess weight. As you rightly say that doesn’t always add up to a car that is fun to drive.
I am not sure I follow, 163bhp per tonne is based on the weight and power.....a heavier car will need more power to reach the same ratio?
Yes, but despite having the same power-to-weight ratio it may not be as much fun to drive as the lighter car. Increased weight has an impact on more attributes of a car than just needing more power.

JMo22

99 posts

180 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
I have to say I've never been able to bring myself to sell my Clio 182 Trophy for these very reasons, although I have been tempted by RWD on many occasions.

180 bhp / 1,090kg = 165 Bhp per tonne

DJRC

23,563 posts

237 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
Christoph old boy...Ill let you into a little secret that is relatively widely known among certain sections of the UK's motoring society...the tdi Passat is a God amongst vehicles.

Get yourself along to any multi-site company in the UK and go round the car park. You will find many many tdi Passats of all ages. Why? Because the tdi in its various 1.9 or so formats for the last 15+ yrs has been returning 50mpg, 70mph cormfortable cruising all day long for starship milages. Oh and before the engines went all uber high tech, high pressure, the old ones would run on anything oil based.

I picked my estate up at 250,000 miles, ran it for 150 miles everyday, 15yrs old, £550 and it hit the figures above everyday. I ran it on a random mix of diesel, drop of petrol, sunflower oil, chip shop oil and straight supermarket veg oil. It even suffered an exploded wheel at 60mph on the A3 just north of Guildford and got me safely to the side of the road in a stable manner. Cost £250 to sort, back on the road 2 days later. Car last me the whole year I used it, I put another 35,000 miles on it before it finally died after the horrendous abuse I gave it.

The Passat is a Godlike vehicle, every iteration they bring out. Oh and they can also be hustled at rapid velocities down country roads.

Edited by DJRC on Monday 13th February 10:48

Fat Audi 80

2,403 posts

252 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
Christoph old boy...Ill let you into a little secret that is relatively widely known among certain sections of the UK's motoring society...the tdi Passat is a God amongst vehicles.

Get yourself along to any multi-site company in the UK and go round the car park. You will find many many tdi Passats of all ages. Why? Because the tdi in its various 1.9 or so formats for the last 15+ yrs has been returning 50mpg, 70mph cormfortable cruising all day long for starship milages. Oh and before the engines went all uber high tech, high pressure, the old ones would run on anything oil based.

I picked my estate up at 250,000 miles, ran it for 150 miles everyday, 15yrs old, £550 and it hit the figures above everyday. I ran it on a random mix of diesel, drop of petrol, sunflower oil, chip shop oil and straight supermarket veg oil. It even suffered an exploded wheel at 60mph on the A3 just north of Guildford and got me safely to the side of the road in a stable manner. Cost £250 to sort, back on the road 2 days later. Car last me the whole year I used it, I put another 35,000 miles on it before it finally died after the horrendous abuse I gave it.

The Passat is a Godlike vehicle, every iteration they bring out. Oh and they can also be hustled at rapid velocities down country roads.

Edited by DJRC on Monday 13th February 10:48
Not wishing to put a downer on the Passat appreciation thread, but I am sad to say that I have completely fallen out of love with mine. My 2001 130pd has just cost me over £3000 trying to sort out a coolant loss problem that ultimately required a new head gasket and a set of reconditioned injectors (these were £1100) alone. I have previously loved this car, but it has really tainted the VAG build quality and reliability reputation for me. I do hope it can redeem itself again over the next 12 months, otherwise I fear it may be gone....

Dagnut

3,515 posts

194 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
Everyone's talking about fun and power to weight.............he's talking a about a diesel saloon.

Tom_C76

1,923 posts

189 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
It's certainly an interesting view to find on Pistonheads, and one I generally agree with. I see no point whatsoever in the E55/E63 Mercs, particularly after seeing one on track with cooked brakes after 5 laps of the old Snett.

However, the power/weight isn't the only attribute that matters. I've got a Fabia vRS, which is somewhere around the magic figure, possibly a bit below, with 180bhp and a bit over a tonne. I've also got a 140bhp Caterham (540kg) giving a bit over 250bhp/tonne. The Fabia is much faster on an everyday basis simply because of the power delivery.

jamieatkinson

9 posts

147 months

Monday 13th February 2012
quotequote all
Chris,

Sounds like good logic to me, i used to have a 2009 Honda s2000 and although pretty peaky when it was on song and going it was probably about as much performance as you honestly needed. It has 182 bhp/ton.
Then had a Mk 5 GOLF GTI with 148 bhp/ton. Always felt like it needed a little more.
So now we have the GT86 coming with just about 160-165 as a likely output.
Sounds just about perfect to me beer