Unexpected "wins"

Author
Discussion

Mrcarfan832

Original Poster:

42 posts

148 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
A while ago I had a traffic light Grand Prix with an 07-plate BMW M5. I was in a '91 Peugeot 205 1.4 XS.

Considering there was a £30k difference between the value of our cars, I was pleasantly suprised to find that he got to the next set of lights, about 300 metres away, just 3 seconds before me. The look on his face in his side mirror was a picture. Was his marginal extra performance really worth £30k more?

So it got me thinking, has anyone else suprised much more supposedly 'powerful' machinery around town?


Bob_Defly

3,714 posts

232 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
This should be titled, "Expected Losses".

3 seconds is a long time in a drag race.

His car was nicer, faster, and sounded better. Well done you!

Mrcarfan832

Original Poster:

42 posts

148 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Bob_Defly said:
This should be titled, "Expected Losses".

3 seconds is a long time in a drag race.

His car was nicer, faster, and sounded better. Well done you!
Not when you consider the enormous buying price difference smile

Bob_Defly

3,714 posts

232 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Mrcarfan832 said:
Bob_Defly said:
This should be titled, "Expected Losses".

3 seconds is a long time in a drag race.

His car was nicer, faster, and sounded better. Well done you!
Not when you consider the enormous buying price difference smile
Maybe, maybe not. Sometimes money isn't a factor. There are many cheap cars that could get within 3 seconds of whatever length drag race of an M5. Maybe he wasn't trying as hard as you think he was.

carreauchompeur

17,855 posts

205 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
You're one of those people who post YouTube videos of them and their mates, 5 up in *insert Eurobox here* "beating" far more expensive cars in non-existent races....

steeveeboy

663 posts

174 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Bob_Defly said:
This should be titled, "Expected Losses".

3 seconds is a long time in a drag race.

His car was nicer, faster, and sounded better. Well done you!
Whether you win by an inch or a mile, Winnings winning! wink

Du1point8

21,612 posts

193 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Mrcarfan832 said:
Bob_Defly said:
This should be titled, "Expected Losses".

3 seconds is a long time in a drag race.

His car was nicer, faster, and sounded better. Well done you!
Not when you consider the enormous buying price difference smile
so he has a car that can do 0-100mph in ten seconds and yours is ??? Can it do 100mph?

Yet you think that your car can stay with his to within 3 seconds over 300 meter dash and think he was flat out trying?

Do you also boast when overtaking lambos on the motorway that your car is therefore a faster car?

Mrcarfan832

Original Poster:

42 posts

148 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
carreauchompeur said:
You're one of those people who post YouTube videos of them and their mates, 5 up in *insert Eurobox here* "beating" far more expensive cars in non-existent races....
Not really, just giving an accurate description of what difference there is around town between a £30k (at least) super saloon and an old pokey hatchback that costs next to nothing.

Bob_Defly

3,714 posts

232 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Mrcarfan832 said:
Having owned quite a few cars in my lifetime I can conclude that, so far, the car that's had the most violent, instant throttle repsone has been (believe it or not) my 205 XS, even more so that the 205 GTi I used to own.

There seems to be literally no lag between pressing the throttle and disappearing into the distance. It feels great.. just 2mm depression of the right-hand peddle and instantly, you're gone. No cushioning, no lag, no blamange.. the instant you press it, you're off. Hard.

Any other cars match this?
laugh

Mrcarfan832

Original Poster:

42 posts

148 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
[quote=Du1point8]

so he has a car that can do 0-100mph in ten seconds and yours is ??? Can it do 100mph?

Yet you think that your car can stay with his to within 3 seconds over 300 meter dash and think he was flat out trying?

Yes!!

I guess it's one of those things where you 'had to be there' to see it smile

TheEnd

15,370 posts

189 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
You should have asked him to swap cars, after that, I'm sure he'd would have been right on it.

Aizle

12,429 posts

176 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Mrcarfan832 said:
I guess it's one of those things where you 'had to be there' to see it smile
Evidently, I assume your back seats were folded flat too?

EK993

1,931 posts

252 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
But, consider into the price differential that you drive a French piece of st, and he drives an engineering masterpiece and you can see where the extra cash goes.

DukeDickson

4,721 posts

214 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Mrcarfan832]u1point8 said:
so he has a car that can do 0-100mph in ten seconds and yours is ??? Can it do 100mph?

Yet you think that your car can stay with his to within 3 seconds over 300 meter dash and think he was flat out trying?

Yes!!

I guess it's one of those things where you 'had to be there' to see it smile
The phrase 'quit while you're behind' comes to mind, strangely.

F i F

44,222 posts

252 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
DukeDickson said:
The phrase 'quit while you're behind' comes to mind, strangely.
rofl

How apt, the only problem with this thread is that the second post didn't just say:-

This won't go well for the OP.

And then we got the "well you had to be there." oh extra deliciousness. (made up word)


carreauchompeur

17,855 posts

205 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
I've got an amusing mental image in my head of the BMW driver cruising up to the lights with the OP bazzing his way to them at 18,000 rpm feverishly counting 'one thousand, two thousand, three thousand'...

carreauchompeur

17,855 posts

205 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
... With a possible post-race victory fap.

DukeDickson

4,721 posts

214 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
The somewhat geek response would be, of course, that assuming that even an 'ickle old Pug isn't worth less than a laptop, a Mars bar and a packet of cheesy poofs, a more recent & reasonably heavily optioned AUC M5 is available for @ 30 BOS:

http://www.bmw.co.uk/bmwuk/bmwauc/details/0,,1156_...


OP - As a general comparator, have you ever even seen this?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ckh8H0xjU0g


Your fun little thing isn't exactly a million miles away from being a Golf to the Lambo GTI!


Now, go & do your 200 lines - "I will attempt to understand relative performance, either via common sense, reasonable reference sites such as Fastest Laps, or good old fashioned u-toob, before admitting that the dunce cap over in that dark corner has a certain attraction".





dtrump

2,121 posts

192 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
Wow, 3 seconds huh. You sure showed him who's boss
Now put on a K&N filter. That should see you sailing ahead the next time


DukeDickson said:
mmmmmmmmmm plastic timber dash, yum hurl

e8_pack

1,384 posts

182 months

Sunday 19th February 2012
quotequote all
didnt the XS have the same engine as the AXGT with the twin choke solex? Nippy little cars in their day and could surprise quite a few cars.