Evoke Convertible, Spotted [with pictures]

Evoke Convertible, Spotted [with pictures]

Author
Discussion

sherbert90

1,906 posts

153 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
Although it's not to my taste, it will be a runaway success and keep thousands in jobs. So that makes me feel ok about it.

Phil Dicky

7,162 posts

264 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
sherbert90 said:
Although it's not to my taste, it will be a runaway success and keep thousands in jobs. So that makes me feel ok about it.
What self respecting yummy mummy wouldnt want one !!!!!!!!

ZeeTacoe

5,444 posts

223 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
flattotheboards said:
I'm not a fan despite quite liking the normal version, it just looks too bottom heavy. There is too much going on at the bottom of the car which doesn't give well to a convertible bodystyle IMO as there isn't anything to balance it out.
It looks like a bathtub on wheels.

CraigMST

9,080 posts

166 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
It looks like a boat. Wonder what the turning circle is like in one of them?

sherbert90

1,906 posts

153 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
Phil Dicky said:
sherbert90 said:
Although it's not to my taste, it will be a runaway success and keep thousands in jobs. So that makes me feel ok about it.
What self respecting yummy mummy wouldnt want one !!!!!!!!
That and the WAG brigade. Someone else hit the nail on the head on the other thread: It's not a car designed for petrolheads, but then most drivers aren't petrolheads. As long as it helps to keep a British ran company in business, so be it.

By the way, what is an 'Evoke'?hehe

fredd1e

781 posts

221 months

Monday 27th February 2012
quotequote all
Perambulator! wonder if LR are going to commission Silver Cross to do a range of accessories /upgrades for it.

Ramses

Original Poster:

831 posts

156 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
CraigMST said:
It looks like a boat. Wonder what the turning circle is like in one of them?
Looking at it manoeuvring around, it was no better/no worse than any other AWD/FWD car.

On looks - not my taste, but looked a lot better, and a lot less cumbersome in the flesh.

LuS1fer

41,139 posts

246 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Are they going to have a 2WD version for when the diffs break?

kambites

67,587 posts

222 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Ramses said:
On looks - not my taste, but looked a lot better, and a lot less cumbersome in the flesh.
I can quite imagine that it would actually - the biggest problem in pictures is that it looks like an "ordinary" four seater sort-top, which makes it look really badly proportioned. I'd imagine that an idea of scale would make it look enough different from normal cars for the unusual proportions to be less offensive.

To my mind that's what makes the biggest difference between seeing pictures of a car and seeing a real one. Particular styling cues only suit certain sized cars, which is why some cars look good in pictures but rubbish in the metal (because the styling doesn't suit those dimensions) and some are the other way around (because the styling only suits those dimensions).

Edited by kambites on Tuesday 28th February 08:57

Rawwr

22,722 posts

235 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
It'd be like driving around in a loaf of bread.

Codswallop

5,250 posts

195 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
I really don't like that. Without the roof, it accentuates how much metal there is below the window line and it makes the car look dumpy.

I've typed this before, and I'll type it again - I really resent that there is more of a market for crap like this these days than for honest to goodness, simple, light, RWD sportscars and roadsters.

TIGA84

5,210 posts

232 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
lankybob said:
This angle looks excellent IMO. Almost certainly a bit gay but I like it.


I dont know why, but I thought of this when I first saw it.

durbster

10,284 posts

223 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Whether you like it or not you might as well get used to it. I think they are going to sell loads of these.

kambites

67,587 posts

222 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
I'd be interested to know how they've dealt with roll-over protection. It's going to be a bloody heavy thing to support on pop-up roll hoops if it does go over and I can't believe they can make that window frame support a significant proportion of its weight.

Mind you, I don't think any full convertibles are particularly good if they roll over.

Wigeon Incognito

3,271 posts

219 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
I don't think it looks bad as a car, but I do think it looks bad as a Range Rover.

Dog Star

16,145 posts

169 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Am I missing something here or is there some sort of "emperor's new clothes" thing going on?

Sorry - but that is simply awful. I suppose it sort of typifies the times we live in; it's not elegant, beautiful or understated, it's just awful, chunky, "bigger is better", "look at me!", tasteless tat. It's not just the car either - it's the sort of people/lifestyle that it represents to me. I suppose I'm being snobby but I daresay that footballers, builders and "barrowboys done good" will be snapping them up.

It's horrible- utterly tasteless. I really would rather drive a Rodius.

vomit

kambites

67,587 posts

222 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
I think you could say the same about the huge majority of SUVs.

Dog Star

16,145 posts

169 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
kambites said:
I think you could say the same about the huge majority of SUVs.
Agreed, however making it into a convertible puts it leagues beyond a mere blinged up RRS on 26" rims. That thing really is something else.

R11ysf

1,936 posts

183 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
Ramses,
Is that taken in Shad Thames?

bencollins

3,525 posts

206 months

Tuesday 28th February 2012
quotequote all
TIGA84 said:


I dont know why, but I thought of this when I first saw it.
+1