Evoke Convertible, Spotted [with pictures]

[Chr1sch]

The Crack Fox said:

That is the most vulgar, tasteless, contrived dollop of tat on wheels I have even had the misfortune to accidentally glance at on the internet. It'll sell loads.

Couldnt agree more, absolutely horrid looking thing...

[pilchardthecat]

Chr1sch said:

The Crack Fox said:

That is the most vulgar, tasteless, contrived dollop of tat on wheels I have even had the misfortune to accidentally glance at on the internet. It'll sell loads.

Couldnt agree more, absolutely horrid looking thing...

Agreed.

It is a ghastly, tastelss, slab-sided, celebrity-magazine-reading, chav-wagon.

Which makes it the perfect vehcile for most of the British population. It will be a huge success.

[Corpulent Tosser]

Codswallop said:

I've typed this before, and I'll type it again - I really resent that there is more of a market for crap like this these days than for honest to goodness, simple, light, RWD sportscars and roadsters.

A couple of questions spring to mind
"Market for crap like this" How many cars are there like this and where is this market ?

Why do you resent there being a market for any kind of car ?

BTW I don't think it looks good, the balance of the car doesn't look right, but if someone wants/gets one why would it bother anyone else ?

[matt3001]

I saw this as well....

Few pictures that I took....

[CY88]

Shock horror.... a black Land rover soft-top!











To be honest the evoque is a lot better executed than previous attempts at a Range Rover Convertible

Edited by CY88 on Tuesday 28th February 11:13

[Risotto]

It looks gauche and vulgar; key attributes as far as the target market is concerned, so it should sell well.

[stuckmojo]

Ramses said:

Spotted over the weekend.

This is the only photo I can stomach. It's dark enough to NOT see it.

[Steve_W]

Ramses said:

Spotted over the weekend.

Looks better in the flesh.

<stereotype generator on>
Does the shop sign indicate the colour of the target owners' tans?
</stereotype generator on>

To me there is too much body to too little screen/roofline - but I think that of the hardtop too.

[ZOLLAR]

Roof up



I like and dislike it at the same time..

[ZOLLAR]

I always liked this

[billzeebub]

pilchardthecat said:

Chr1sch said:

The Crack Fox said:

That is the most vulgar, tasteless, contrived dollop of tat on wheels I have even had the misfortune to accidentally glance at on the internet. It'll sell loads.

Couldnt agree more, absolutely horrid looking thing...

Agreed.

It is a ghastly, tastelss, slab-sided, celebrity-magazine-reading, chav-wagon.

Which makes it the perfect vehcile for most of the British population. It will be a huge success.

Couldn't agree more with the above comments. The car for people with lots of unwarranted self-confidence and little education..you know the Towie type who own businesses selling similar over priced tat to even more vacuous wannabe 'Me' obsessed chavs . It will be a huge sales success..

[Dog Star]

Risotto said:

It looks gauche and vulgar.

"Vulgar" is the perfect word for this.

[chillo]

CY88 said:

Edited by CY88 on Tuesday 28th February 11:13

like that! what version of defender is it?

[fatboy69]

It will sell well in Chelsea & Kensington if nowwhere else however it's not that bad to look at.

Is it?

[thinfourth2]

While it might not be completely to my tastes I'm glad it is being built and being built in the UK


It would be a drab world if everyone bought a golf in resale grey

[CY88]

chillo said:

CY88 said:

Edited by CY88 on Tuesday 28th February 11:13

like that! what version of defender is it?

NAS (North American Spec) - had a V8 and softtop and wasn't available in the UK.

[Morba]

Don't see why all the hatred tbh.

[deltashad]

Gay

[sherbert90]

deltashad said:

Gay

Eloquently put.

[soad]

sherbert90 said:

deltashad said:

Gay

Eloquently put.