RE: Geneva 2012: Mansory McLaren MP4-12C

RE: Geneva 2012: Mansory McLaren MP4-12C

Author
Discussion

LuS1fer

41,140 posts

246 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
I don't like the bland looks of the MP12 but quite like that - looks Exigey.

Ikemi

8,447 posts

206 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
I like the alloys, although perhaps in gun metal grey, rather than gold!

LuS1fer said:
looks Exigey.
www.specsavers.co.ukhehe

SAndals

170 posts

175 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
Actually....it kinda works!
Change the colour and lose the LEDs and this would be the only Mansory version that looks better than the original!

The Danimal

178 posts

156 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
"Wonder what the folks in Woking will make of this one..."

I think they'll say; "Warranty Void".

lewisf182

2,089 posts

189 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
I think that looks pretty dam good! first thought was it looked like a gallardo though?

legalknievel

352 posts

198 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
This car is an important attempt to answer the (I assure you not utterly pointlesss) question we are all so desperate to explore:

'will a footballer buy a mclaren?'

Or not.

Guvernator

13,164 posts

166 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
Apart from the absolutely sh*te led lights on the front bumper, I actually like it. In fact I'd go as far as to say that I think this is the first Mansory effort that I think actually improves on the (very dull) original! (sorry Macca fans) getmecoat

Orbin

216 posts

147 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
i was expecting it to look absolutely hideous and it's not. i am too shell shocked to say anything else.

anonymous-user

55 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
dele said:
Change the paint and the wheels and i think itd be alright
+1

pagani1

683 posts

203 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
i have just spoken to Mr Dennis-he say YUUUKKKK!!!!
Nose surgery in the offing at Woking for a bit more aggression and more power for the S version from Ricardo.

sumpoil

431 posts

165 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
Ryvita said:
"Therefore, to be possess'd with double pomp,
To guard a title that was rich before,
To gild refined gold, to paint the lily,
To throw a perfume on the violet,
To smooth the ice, or add another hue
Unto the rainbow, or with taper-light
To seek the beauteous eye of heaven to garnish,
Is wasteful and ridiculous excess."

King John, Shakespeare
is it fair to say that these King John and Shakespeare chaps prefer the standard car then? ..... i think they need to get in touch with the 'plain english society' read

stackmonkey

5,077 posts

250 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
Well it's not quite as hideous as I was expecting, which is a surprise.
But why when I read the words 'Mansory' or 'Kahn' do I always think of lovely, expensive cars that have been very expensively ruined? frown

David87

6,662 posts

213 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
I love how one set of LED DRLs just isn't enough. hehe

SpudLink

5,857 posts

193 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
anything fast said:
I think its about time Mclaren did some major fiddling with this car..

Get the bd up to 1000 bhp, put a 400k price tag on it and make the Veyron look like what it is.. an overpriced, over engineered rich mans willy on wheels.

its got the potential!
As I understood it, there are going to be 3 separate models in the McLaren range, with the MP4-12C as the entry level car.

However, I'd be surprised if they ever go after the Veyron. I expect they will be looking to match Ferrari's blueprints 'market sector'

PaulMoor

3,209 posts

164 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
Increased power and speed by swaping to an exaust that would never past regs for a proper manufacture and making the wheels bigger? Not exactly clever. And adding CF that dose nothing more than add cost? Why? And why on earth do they think they have done better with the aerodynamicist than a company that employs some of the best, if not the best, in the world. Maclarens wind tunnel probably costs more than Mansory's entire facility.

It dose not look that bad, but it embodies all that is wrong about car "tuners".

Guvernator

13,164 posts

166 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
PaulMoor said:
Increased power and speed by swaping to an exaust that would never past regs for a proper manufacture and making the wheels bigger? Not exactly clever. And adding CF that dose nothing more than add cost? Why? And why on earth do they think they have done better with the aerodynamicist than a company that employs some of the best, if not the best, in the world. Maclarens wind tunnel probably costs more than Mansory's entire facility.

It dose not look that bad, but it embodies all that is wrong about car "tuners".
While I agree that none of the additions probably help to make it a "better" car in terms of driveability, I still think it has improved the rather drab looks by some degree and I never thought I'd ever say that about anything which came out of a Mansory workshop. However that might say more about the rather dull and generic looking original, it now looks like a supercar.

mikey k

13,011 posts

217 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
I was put off by the looks of the MP4 late last year and bought an Aston Vantage S.
Bizarrely thats got my interest again frown
I know I shouldn't though getmecoat

How the hell Mansory think they can do better than the "geeks" are McLaren I've no idea silly

F1GTRUeno

6,357 posts

219 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
It looks better than McLaren's own HS variant.

DanDC5

18,806 posts

168 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
I think that looks really good. Probably change the colour of the wheels to gunmetal though.

newbrightapple

9 posts

236 months

Thursday 1st March 2012
quotequote all
Pretty tame for them maybe more rad inside tweeks aye ....