RE: Geneva 2012: Mansory McLaren MP4-12C
Discussion
I like the alloys, although perhaps in gun metal grey, rather than gold!
LuS1fer said:
looks Exigey.
www.specsavers.co.ukRyvita said:
"Therefore, to be possess'd with double pomp,
To guard a title that was rich before,
To gild refined gold, to paint the lily,
To throw a perfume on the violet,
To smooth the ice, or add another hue
Unto the rainbow, or with taper-light
To seek the beauteous eye of heaven to garnish,
Is wasteful and ridiculous excess."
King John, Shakespeare
is it fair to say that these King John and Shakespeare chaps prefer the standard car then? ..... i think they need to get in touch with the 'plain english society' To guard a title that was rich before,
To gild refined gold, to paint the lily,
To throw a perfume on the violet,
To smooth the ice, or add another hue
Unto the rainbow, or with taper-light
To seek the beauteous eye of heaven to garnish,
Is wasteful and ridiculous excess."
King John, Shakespeare
anything fast said:
I think its about time Mclaren did some major fiddling with this car..
Get the bd up to 1000 bhp, put a 400k price tag on it and make the Veyron look like what it is.. an overpriced, over engineered rich mans willy on wheels.
its got the potential!
As I understood it, there are going to be 3 separate models in the McLaren range, with the MP4-12C as the entry level car. Get the bd up to 1000 bhp, put a 400k price tag on it and make the Veyron look like what it is.. an overpriced, over engineered rich mans willy on wheels.
its got the potential!
However, I'd be surprised if they ever go after the Veyron. I expect they will be looking to match Ferrari's
Increased power and speed by swaping to an exaust that would never past regs for a proper manufacture and making the wheels bigger? Not exactly clever. And adding CF that dose nothing more than add cost? Why? And why on earth do they think they have done better with the aerodynamicist than a company that employs some of the best, if not the best, in the world. Maclarens wind tunnel probably costs more than Mansory's entire facility.
It dose not look that bad, but it embodies all that is wrong about car "tuners".
It dose not look that bad, but it embodies all that is wrong about car "tuners".
PaulMoor said:
Increased power and speed by swaping to an exaust that would never past regs for a proper manufacture and making the wheels bigger? Not exactly clever. And adding CF that dose nothing more than add cost? Why? And why on earth do they think they have done better with the aerodynamicist than a company that employs some of the best, if not the best, in the world. Maclarens wind tunnel probably costs more than Mansory's entire facility.
It dose not look that bad, but it embodies all that is wrong about car "tuners".
While I agree that none of the additions probably help to make it a "better" car in terms of driveability, I still think it has improved the rather drab looks by some degree and I never thought I'd ever say that about anything which came out of a Mansory workshop. However that might say more about the rather dull and generic looking original, it now looks like a supercar.It dose not look that bad, but it embodies all that is wrong about car "tuners".
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff