RE: Geneva 2012: Bentley EXP 9 F
Discussion
dvs_dave said:
Didn't think of the LM002 however the terms "SUV" and "production" are debatable with it? After all it's actually a pickup and with only 300 or so made by hand would it class as a production vehicle?
SUV - Sports Utility Vehicle - yup i recon the LM002 ticks that box.How many of the Bentley Azure do they make - howmanyleft says less than 300 on the roads (ok in the UK only)
PascalBuyens said:
VeeDub Geezer said:
Mini1275 said:
Well it ain't going to win any beauty contests!.
I think this photoshop looks slightly better:
This would have been perfect a few years ago. I think this photoshop looks slightly better:
Beefmeister said:
Hastily photoshopped out the horrid lower lights, added smaller ones inboard, changed wheels to less minging design, removed extra grille.
Getting there I think, but still far from pretty.
This is closer. Swap the lights so the larger ones are on the inside and it could fit in with the current family face.Getting there I think, but still far from pretty.
(Would give it a shot but haven't got any Photoshop skills at all)
XJSJohn said:
dvs_dave said:
Didn't think of the LM002 however the terms "SUV" and "production" are debatable with it? After all it's actually a pickup and with only 300 or so made by hand would it class as a production vehicle?
SUV - Sports Utility Vehicle - yup i recon the LM002 ticks that box.How many of the Bentley Azure do they make - howmanyleft says less than 300 on the roads (ok in the UK only)
If the Hummer H1 is an SUV, so is the LM002. If the Macca F1 held the title as "World's Fastest Production Car", and subsequently the Veyron, I think over 300 units does qualify the LM002 as "production".
Beefmeister said:
PascalBuyens said:
Actually that's what I was thinking too, seeing Beefmeisters attempt. Take the "family face", put that on the front, and then take the tail lights from that shooting brake for the back...
(Would give it a shot but haven't got any Photoshop skills at all)
Okay, I've had a go at the front again with the requests.(Would give it a shot but haven't got any Photoshop skills at all)
I think the back end is a lost cause...
Where's that photoshop manual?
EDIT: had a real rough go at the rear... (no PS...)
Edited by PascalBuyens on Monday 12th March 19:13
Edited by PascalBuyens on Monday 12th March 19:21
Edited by PascalBuyens on Monday 12th March 19:22
fathomfive said:
Designed by Leepu?
TBH I think Leepu would have done a better job.I'm not sure which bothers me the most, the fact that someone designed such a carbunkle of ugliness or the fact that the manangement approved it.
Get rid of the turbine lights and wheels and it may look a lot better, the side hump is a Bentley styling cue now so I understand why that's there but it needs to be toned down a little but OMG the light pattern of those rear lamps, did they get an Etch a sketch for Christmas?
Well thats ugly, wonder what the lambo SUV will look like.
I'd bet the car that makes production in 3? years time won't look like the "concept" which has obviously been styled at the radical end of the spectrum. I'm thinking continental on stilts for the production version, well it works for Porsche.
I'd bet the car that makes production in 3? years time won't look like the "concept" which has obviously been styled at the radical end of the spectrum. I'm thinking continental on stilts for the production version, well it works for Porsche.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff