RE: Ginetta delivers first G60

RE: Ginetta delivers first G60

Author
Discussion

kambites

67,561 posts

221 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
HeMightBeBanned said:
kambites said:
In a perverse kind of way that's a good thing for me, as are the poor panel gaps. It shows they've spent the money on the bits that matter to me, not on employing some over-paid artist to put a few weird curves in the bodywork.
I'd worry that they'd skimped on everything else too, tbh.
And if it had perfect panel gaps would that be any kind of evidence that it was mechanically sound?

juansolo

3,012 posts

278 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
I like everything about it apart from the cost.

soad

32,894 posts

176 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
juansolo said:
I like everything about it apart from the cost.
Me too.

anonymous-user

54 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
soad said:
Me too.
I will third that

tommy vercetti

11,489 posts

163 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Good news, but it is quite expensive

Ian974

2,940 posts

199 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Just a shame that it's taken so long to get on the road. It looked excellent when it first appeared, but I think it lost everyones interest.
If it was 2002 it was first shown, this body design is older or a similar age to the ferrari F430, Porsche Carrera gt and noble M12.

DonkeyApple

55,272 posts

169 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
kambites said:
In a perverse kind of way that's a good thing for me, as are the poor panel gaps. It shows they've spent the money on the bits that matter to me, not on employing some over-paid artist to put a few weird curves in the bodywork.
Or it shows they haven't had the money to develop it?

3 cars with one eventually being sold to a client.

How many cars were included in the sale of Farbio?

I do like this car but there seem to be telltale signs of all not being well when you look at it in the cold light of day.

Cotty

39,539 posts

284 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Excellent G40R next.

Lowtimer

4,286 posts

168 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
MarJay said:
I think it looks awesome (forgive me for sounding so... American).

If it was £40k or even £50k it would sell by the boatload, but £70k is pretty steep IMO.
Sounds pretty good too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pawmdwhBQDQ , from about 1:20

And what does it feel like?
"Like an NSX Type R", sayeth Sutters.

ukaskew

10,642 posts

221 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Amazed this has finally hit the road, my first proper photography job offer came courtesy of whoever was trying to build this about 6 years ago. Not surprisingly it fell through.

andyps

7,817 posts

282 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
I had a good look at one last week (Ginetta owned presumably!) and was impressed. It is very compact, looks good in orange (in my opinion) and I certainly didn't think the panel gaps were too bad. Whilst it may be expensive Ginetta seem to be quite happy that they are only going to sell a few so that is not a problem, there should be the 50 customers they are looking for that don't want a Porsche or Lotus or anything else made in higher volume. Also, as it has been developed by a company owned by someone who won his class at Le Mans (LMP2 I think) and is a very successful businessman and wants to remain so, I suspect it will be well developed and priced accordingly.

If it fitted my requirement for a car and I had the money it would be very high up my shopping list.

GTRene

16,543 posts

224 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
I think its not bad, it is something special and not many will be made, so it stays rare too.

Raja

8,290 posts

235 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
I'd really like to see a fully finished one properly road tested. I actually like the look of it. 0-60 and 0-100 times etc would be interesting. I've never believed any manufacturer that claims 4.9secs 0-60.

70k is a bit steep, but if the reviews are positive I'm sure they'll sell well, or at least as well as a Lotus Evora

bobberz

1,832 posts

199 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Ian974 said:
Just a shame that it's taken so long to get on the road. It looked excellent when it first appeared, but I think it lost everyones interest.
If it was 2002 it was first shown, this body design is older or a similar age to the ferrari F430, Porsche Carrera gt and noble M12.
I think the C-GT and the Noble have aged pretty well, though.

Speaking of Noble, I'm thinking that adding a couple turbos to that 3.7 V6 could make this one serious performance car.

70 grand does seem a lot for the performance, but at least you'd probably never see another one on the road, as compared to a Cayman/911.

For someone who wants a unique, bespoke sports car, this seems to tick all the boxes.


EDLT

15,421 posts

206 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
griffdude said:
A friend of mine has one of these Farbood things. Powered by a twin turbo V6 Audi engine. It goes pretty well & looks much better in the flesh.
The article says there are only three in existence, the other two being owned by Ginetta and powered by a Ford engines confused

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

209 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
I absolutely LOVE it.

But 70k? Nonsense. Its what killed TVR.

MTR

TYU

91 posts

211 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
There are 3 G60/F400 in existence.... There is also a Farboud in existence....
a handful of Farbio GTS350's and one Farbio GTS400 out there as well.

They are ALL different cars.... The Farbio was a fairly hefty redesign of the original Farboud concept with a different
engine and MANY under the skin changes and Ginetta have now done the same again.

For me they peaked with the white Farbio GTS400... WIth it's tuned supercharged V6 the performance figures were
far more impressive than the G60 (more than a second faster 0-60) and the handling is superb.

And 3 years later it's still mine... so I MAY be biased!

:-)

andyps

7,817 posts

282 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
mollytherocker said:
I absolutely LOVE it.

But 70k? Nonsense. Its what killed TVR.

MTR
TVR had a business model reliant on more than 50 cars being sold, Ginetta don't.

Lawrence Tomlinson apparently considered buying TVR but a certain Russian got in with a higher bid. A shame really as LNT appears to have pretty good business acumen and is a true petrolhead so maybe we would still have TVR had he been successful.

skene

2,290 posts

172 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
Looks like a sad Noble M400

mollytherocker

14,366 posts

209 months

Monday 26th March 2012
quotequote all
andyps said:
mollytherocker said:
I absolutely LOVE it.

But 70k? Nonsense. Its what killed TVR.

MTR
TVR had a business model reliant on more than 50 cars being sold, Ginetta don't.

Lawrence Tomlinson apparently considered buying TVR but a certain Russian got in with a higher bid. A shame really as LNT appears to have pretty good business acumen and is a true petrolhead so maybe we would still have TVR had he been successful.
I truly wish him well, but stand by my comments.

MTR