Renault Megane Sports - lap times

Renault Megane Sports - lap times

Author
Discussion

Motorrad

6,811 posts

188 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
This thread has ensured that my next test drive and target car for SWMBO is possibly going to be a Megane rather than the Scirocco I'd been postulating.

jonm01

817 posts

238 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
I just got a 250 recently, cup pack with leather Recaros, just under 12000 miles on it. Build quality is actually pretty good, certainly on a par with the MINI JCW I had previously and the ride even with the cup pack is better than the MINI. I am really impressed with it. Just need to try it on track to see how good it really is.

roystinho

3,767 posts

176 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
To be honest, most of the Renaultsport stuff is fantastic to drive. I've driven most of the cars mentioned, and there's none where I've thought I'd have the German equivalent on the 'driving' perspective.

Ok some of the older Clios and Meganes aren't the greatest for perceived build quality, but they're usually better than the boggo Renault stuff as they're built at different factories (certainly the Clio is still built at the Alpine Dieppe factory).

People who won't even test drive them because they're French don't know what they're missing. Their loss to be honest.

My favourites are the R26.r, Clio Trophy, and the V6 Clio (for sheer madness of it). 250/265 is great, but lacks a bit of feel for me, I'm in the Clio 200 at the minute which I think is the best current car

Edited by roystinho on Sunday 15th April 22:44

Stedman

7,226 posts

193 months

Sunday 15th April 2012
quotequote all
Noger said:
There is one parked in Reigate High Street most days (I really hope it doesn't belong to an estate agent, that would be depressing). Looks absolutely awesome.

Not sure about "giant killing" lap times, but one variant has the FWD Evo lap record at Bedford I think. Certainly up there with the sort of machinery you think *should* be faster.
Yeap see that often. Sexy smile

GravelBen

15,696 posts

231 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Out of interest, how comparable are the tyres fitted relative to other cars its lap times are compared to?

veevee

1,455 posts

152 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
I'm willing to bet no manufacturer is going to put a high performance car round the 'ring without a fair bit of consideration of what tyres they're going to run.

Diamond blue

3,252 posts

201 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
The record holder which is the current 265 Trophy runs on perfectly sensible Bridgestone RE050s. Sticky but hardly semi-slicks.
Mine look like they'll make 10-12k out of the fronts based on wear so far.

I think the grip they generate together with the highly effective use of the LSD are what makes them so fast. Across Wales recently I found the Trophy to be as fast as anything else I,ve had. Your high up (By comparison) , its firm and slightly bouncy ride is actually perfectly judged for B Roads and it plenty powerful enough to go as fast as you need . Oh and its got great brakes too.

Grovsie26

1,302 posts

168 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Little Dave said:
LOL. Thats what a lot of people said. I had had 911's for about 8 years and wanted something different. I have no interest in badge snobbery and wanted something that Really put a smile on my face. It is also good to know that I won't be facing regular 4 figure service and tyre bills.

I will get rid of the Megane early next year. I have no idea what will be next but no doubt will surprise some people.
Hehehe fair play mate if you're happy, it just seems a bit odd. The megane, to me doesn't do anything better. It's a hot hatch at the end of the day, ok it's very quick round a track and will post some impressive times, but are you honestly saying it's more fun to drive than a 911 turbo? I don't believe you if thats the case lol. It also looks worse, sounds no where near as good and the interior isn't a patch on the porker.

cragswinter

21,429 posts

197 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Grovsie26 said:
LOL. Don't know if serious.
I sold my M3csl to buy my megane r26.r

All my mates hated me for it & thought I was nuts, then I showed them a couple of ring laps in it wink

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Vladimir said:
It was the Evo lap times that prompted me to post - R26.R is VERY quick (beats the STI, ISF, RS6, , Boxster S) ,but the 265 Trophy is really quite astonishing - only a fraction behind the Evo X RS360, it beats the TTRS, DBS, Panamera Turbo, Evora and many others. Seriously nippy hatch!
Not wanting to take anything away from it, as I have a soft spot for the r26.r, but look at the cars you've listed.

Big saloons, even bigger saloons, big GT touring cars and some small sports cars designed for fun rather than out and out pace.

Also the r26.r uses semi slicks iirc, so I'm not surprised it can put in good lap times.

Maty

1,233 posts

214 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
I've currently got an 08 RS Megane, diesel version though unfortunately so very un'PH to say the least. However the handling is unbelieveable for a FWD diesel hatch, I did quite a few years racing FWD cars and I've driven quite a few hot hatches, some on track but nothing compares to the Megane. I'd love a go of an R26, I can't imagine how good they as well as the RS250 if mine is anything to go by.

On the flip side though my 14 month old son could have screwed it together better than Renault did. Honestly the build quality is beyond shocking, to drive it round day to day is just a test in how long your patience will last before you start prodding and pushing at interior trim to "see if that's where the noise is coming from". For that reason alone I hate the thing, but show it a decent road and I absolutely love it!

I hear the newer RS250 are much better build quality wise, I'd be tempted to give it a go but they don't offer a diesel version anymore and my annual mileage just can't justify a petrol.

Diamond blue

3,252 posts

201 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Grovsie26 said:
Little Dave said:
LOL. Thats what a lot of people said. I had had 911's for about 8 years and wanted something different. I have no interest in badge snobbery and wanted something that Really put a smile on my face. It is also good to know that I won't be facing regular 4 figure service and tyre bills.

I will get rid of the Megane early next year. I have no idea what will be next but no doubt will surprise some people.
Hehehe fair play mate if you're happy, it just seems a bit odd. The megane, to me doesn't do anything better. It's a hot hatch at the end of the day, ok it's very quick round a track and will post some impressive times, but are you honestly saying it's more fun to drive than a 911 turbo? I don't believe you if thats the case lol. It also looks worse, sounds no where near as good and the interior isn't a patch on the porker.
I'm not sure its got a worse interior than a 996 911 tbh. Not Porsche's strongest suit in those days. A Turbo is a great car but it also lacks aural magic and the Megane handles brilliantly. You would be amazed I suspect. Its got fantastic body control, quick feelsome steering and tremendous brakes. But of course it has a charisma free motor and Front Wheel drive limits some of the fun you can get up to (But so does 4WD )
But its cheap thrills too with little in the way of scary bills and lots of independents around. I seriously considered replacing a GT3 with an R26R a few years ago.

Grovsie26

1,302 posts

168 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Just can't get that excited about a 2 litre turbo renault thats FWD. Don't really care how fast it goes round a track. The engine is very dull and the gearchange if like previous fast renaults is crap.

papercup

2,490 posts

220 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Grovsie26 said:
Just can't get that excited about a 2 litre turbo renault thats FWD. Don't really care how fast it goes round a track. The engine is very dull and the gearchange if like previous fast renaults is crap.
<looks at car history>

<wanders off>

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
Diamond blue said:
Grovsie26 said:
Little Dave said:
LOL. Thats what a lot of people said. I had had 911's for about 8 years and wanted something different. I have no interest in badge snobbery and wanted something that Really put a smile on my face. It is also good to know that I won't be facing regular 4 figure service and tyre bills.

I will get rid of the Megane early next year. I have no idea what will be next but no doubt will surprise some people.
Hehehe fair play mate if you're happy, it just seems a bit odd. The megane, to me doesn't do anything better. It's a hot hatch at the end of the day, ok it's very quick round a track and will post some impressive times, but are you honestly saying it's more fun to drive than a 911 turbo? I don't believe you if thats the case lol. It also looks worse, sounds no where near as good and the interior isn't a patch on the porker.
I'm not sure its got a worse interior than a 996 911 tbh. Not Porsche's strongest suit in those days. A Turbo is a great car but it also lacks aural magic and the Megane handles brilliantly. You would be amazed I suspect. Its got fantastic body control, quick feelsome steering and tremendous brakes. But of course it has a charisma free motor and Front Wheel drive limits some of the fun you can get up to (But so does 4WD )
But its cheap thrills too with little in the way of scary bills and lots of independents around. I seriously considered replacing a GT3 with an R26R a few years ago.
I guess cheap is a relative term, the PH classifieds have r26.r's starting at £16k, which is quite a lot of money for a lot of people.

Curious, in terms of driving dynamics, how does something like the R26.r compare to a DC2 ITR?

veevee

1,455 posts

152 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Vladimir said:
It was the Evo lap times that prompted me to post - R26.R is VERY quick (beats the STI, ISF, RS6, , Boxster S) ,but the 265 Trophy is really quite astonishing - only a fraction behind the Evo X RS360, it beats the TTRS, DBS, Panamera Turbo, Evora and many others. Seriously nippy hatch!
Not wanting to take anything away from it, as I have a soft spot for the r26.r, but look at the cars you've listed.

Big saloons, even bigger saloons, big GT touring cars and some small sports cars designed for fun rather than out and out pace.

Also the r26.r uses semi slicks iirc, so I'm not surprised it can put in good lap times.
List it against some other hot hatches if you think that's more fair? wink

Which small sports cars would it be that are designed for out and out pace rather than fun?

jon-

16,511 posts

217 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
I recently did some laps around MIRA in a V10 R8, e63 AMG and a Megane Cup Plus Sport + Cup thing.

At the end of the day there was some spare time and I managed to sweet talk my way into a few more laps, I had free pick of cars.

I took the Megane. Nuff said.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
veevee said:
List it against some other hot hatches if you think that's more fair? wink

Which small sports cars would it be that are designed for out and out pace rather than fun?
Very few road cars are built as track tools. At least not by mainstream mass production car makers for this price point. So the r26.r enjoys a degree of exclusivity. I didn't get it at first but I think I do now. It's not really a hot hatch, it's a performance coupe that just happens to wear hot hatch clothes. I guess on some level an Elise or Exige is the same type of focus albeit different in end product. But it's cars like those that I'd personally consider as alternatives to the r26.r

veevee

1,455 posts

152 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
veevee said:
List it against some other hot hatches if you think that's more fair? wink

Which small sports cars would it be that are designed for out and out pace rather than fun?
Very few road cars are built as track tools. At least not by mainstream mass production car makers for this price point. So the r26.r enjoys a degree of exclusivity. I didn't get it at first but I think I do now. It's not really a hot hatch, it's a performance coupe that just happens to wear hot hatch clothes. I guess on some level an Elise or Exige is the same type of focus albeit different in end product. But it's cars like those that I'd personally consider as alternatives to the r26.r
But the Elise/Exige are built from the ground up as track cars, wheras this is a very focused hatch - maybe a better comparison would be the Focus RS?

+ it matches the SC Elise time.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Monday 16th April 2012
quotequote all
veevee said:
But the Elise/Exige are built from the ground up as track cars, wheras this is a very focused hatch - maybe a better comparison would be the Focus RS?

+ it matches the SC Elise time.
I don't see the RS as an alternative at all. Totally different ethos and design principle behind it IMO.