E36 M3....are they still fast?

E36 M3....are they still fast?

Author
Discussion

BlitzE34

284 posts

151 months

fozzymandeus

1,045 posts

147 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
GarryA said:
Autocar 9th December 1992.
Aaah. Autocar. The motoring world's very own "Weekly World News".

GarryA

4,700 posts

165 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
fozzymandeus said:
Aaah. Autocar. The motoring world's very own "Weekly World News".
Well it was an interview with BMW Motorsports top man at the time.

fozzymandeus

1,045 posts

147 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
GarryA said:
fozzymandeus said:
Aaah. Autocar. The motoring world's very own "Weekly World News".
Well it was an interview with BMW Motorsports top man at the time.
Are you sure it wasn't with someone who drives a BMW and just happened to be coming out of the nearest branch of Top Man?

iSore

4,011 posts

145 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Aaaah, Autocar, that bastion of accurate reporting......

The M3 E36 was developed by BMW Motorsport with work starting in 1989. That makes it a proper M Car. No, it wasn't handbuilt but neither was the E30 M3 or the M635CSi.

fozzymandeus

1,045 posts

147 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Incidentally, does the 850CSi not count as a "Proper M Car"?

iSore

4,011 posts

145 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
GarryA said:
Well it was an interview with BMW Motorsports top man at the time.
Really? Who?

J4CKO

41,636 posts

201 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Think one will still be plenty fast enough for any eventuallity, 300 ish bhp, RWD for about four grand, whats not to like ?

They are coming out of the wilderness now, i.e. the shaven headed knuckle draggers are off spoiling E46's and have perhaps migrated to 330D's but nice E36 M3's I think have hit rock bottom, and could be going up a bit now, it is one of those cars that needs research, the engines dont last forever and they can get pretty rusty, easy to spend two grand getting the suspension put right and there are a few M specific bits in there I beleive, think these are a car that to avoid bankruptcy you need to be able to do some stuff yourself, I know its an old cliche but it was 40 grand car new and though its four grand now it still needs parts based on what ti cost new.

s m

23,243 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Output Flange said:
GarryA said:
Apologies it was 330CSi
What's your source?
Garry is right - it was reported in all the mags of the time...not only Autocar but also Car and Performance Car and Fast Lane

996 sps

6,165 posts

217 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
OP just take one out for a lengthy test drive make sure you are happy. I've just got rid of an E39 M5 and have to say didn't really rate it. So make sure you want one.

s m

23,243 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
braddo said:
irish boy said:
12.0 0-100 and 13.8 quarter mile.....
I'm not sure those 2 figures tally do they? The former seems too low.
Autocar have tested three E36 M3 variants

E36 M3 3.0 manual

0-100 13.1 ss 1/4 13.9

E36 M3 3.2 manual

0-100 12.2 ss 1/4 13.8

E36 M3 3.2 SMG

0-100 12.9 ss 1/4 13.9

Vladimir

6,917 posts

159 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
StottyZr said:
DPF delete as well as a remap, DXB would be proud hehe

With 204hp 1/4 is 15.2, should be doing ~14 now.
That does sound a tad optimistic. A standard 335d hits 100 in mid 13s (13.3 is the quickest I've seen) and does a 1/4 in a nadge under 14s (again that is the best time) and very few run less than 300bhp. They weigh a bit more but not a lot more.

A remapped 335d can almost dip into a 13s quarter if driven very, very well. But not quite.

The famous DXB may not have made friends here but he has proper evidence of blasting off E36 M3s and E46 M3s in his remapped Starship Enterprise. Not seen the evidence but him and a few other owners claim that even as standard they will seriously scare an E46 and pull away from an E36 M3.

And the power band of these bi-turbo BMW diesels is about 1500-(just under) 5000rpm. About the same or better than many petrols but lower down the rev range.

varsas

4,014 posts

203 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
fozzymandeus said:
Incidentally, does the 850CSi not count as a "Proper M Car"?
Well, it has an 'S' code engine but I suppose the suspension etc hasn't had the full treatment? More of a GT car then a sports car? Awesome car though. The (very possibly untrue) story I heard was that they where developing an M8, which would have had an engine similar to the McLaren F1 engine in it, but a recession put them off.

850CSi is an amazing car though.


BMW 850csi at 300kph

s m

23,243 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
iSore said:
GarryA said:
Well it was an interview with BMW Motorsports top man at the time.
Really? Who?
Kalbfell, Karl-Heinz

redgriff500

26,905 posts

264 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
There's some real BS in this thread

Ozzie Osmond said:
Why not buy a newer and less exotic 2-door BMW which will have at least as much performance and almost certainly lower running costs?
Like what exactly ?

What newer BMW Coupe costs £5000 and has over 300bhp other than an M3 ?

As to comparing a 123D - other than the fact its a feckin diesel so demonstrates you're a miser and looks like a shopping car where can you get a good one for £5k so it compares to the E36 M3 ?

On that basis why aren't we comparing it to a sportsbike - it's as similar.




fozzymandeus

1,045 posts

147 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
s m said:
iSore said:
GarryA said:
Well it was an interview with BMW Motorsports top man at the time.
Really? Who?
Kalbfell, Karl-Heinz
The motoring press, especially the publications suggested, did have a habit of "extrapolation" from merest hints said by various officials, turning such things into full blown stories and FACT before two shakes of a lamb's tale. Autocar and Car particularly.

There's probably a grain of truth in the 330CSi story, what with the E30 M3 being the only car, at that time, to wear the badge, however I doubt it was ever seriously considered. Additionally, BMW suits from that era had a reputation for spreading a bit of smoke.

s m

23,243 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
fozzymandeus said:
s m said:
iSore said:
GarryA said:
Well it was an interview with BMW Motorsports top man at the time.
Really? Who?
Kalbfell, Karl-Heinz
The motoring press, especially the publications suggested, did have a habit of "extrapolation" from merest hints said by various officials, turning such things into full blown stories and FACT before two shakes of a lamb's tale. Autocar and Car particularly.

There's probably a grain of truth in the 330CSi story, what with the E30 M3 being the only car, at that time, to wear the badge, however I doubt it was ever seriously considered. Additionally, BMW suits from that era had a reputation for spreading a bit of smoke.
I guess we'll never know as we didn't talk to him at that time. The fact all 4 mentioned it suggests there was a grain of truth in though, as you say

Mastodon2

13,826 posts

166 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
pat_y said:
If the rear went sideways when he booted it i suspect his rear trailing arm bushes might have been shot. Personally i thought the sound of a standard E36 M3 was one of it's biggest letdowns, never sounded as fast as it actually was.
As standard maybe, swap the standard airbox and exhaust out for something a little spicier and they sound great at high revs.

As for "are they quick" - yes, I'd say so, 300bhp is never "slow" unless you hang around with Arab princes in London! They don't deliver the power with the surge in the low mid-range like you'd get from a turbo, so they don't lurch forward when you stab the throttle but unlike a turbo engine a good NA engine does not run out of puff towards the red line.

If the choice was between a remapped Golf R and an old M3, which will share roughly the same bhp, I'd take the M3 every time.

s m

23,243 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
fozzymandeus said:
s m said:
iSore said:
GarryA said:
Well it was an interview with BMW Motorsports top man at the time.
Really? Who?
Kalbfell, Karl-Heinz
The motoring press, especially the publications suggested, did have a habit of "extrapolation" from merest hints said by various officials, turning such things into full blown stories and FACT before two shakes of a lamb's tale. Autocar and Car particularly.

There's probably a grain of truth in the 330CSi story, what with the E30 M3 being the only car, at that time, to wear the badge, however I doubt it was ever seriously considered. Additionally, BMW suits from that era had a reputation for spreading a bit of smoke.
Here's the relevant bit - it appears as if they have quoted him - maybe they did make it up or paraphrase it but somehow I'll believe he said something along those lines as it was also reported in "Fast Lane", "Car" and "Performance Car" at the time as well as Autocar - they were the main big UK car mags. It doesn't alter the car in any way though


2thumbs

913 posts

187 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
k15tox said:
Ozzie Osmond said:
If you want to feel fast get a turbo car with a rude-boy exhaust.

If you want to go fast buy a decent car - like an M3.
Cheers for that!
There is an element of truth there. It took me a while to get used to my evo, after having a high power turbo car. It felt numb compared to the kick a turbo gives you. I soon got over it biggrin

Re insurance, try Footman James, E36 M3s are old enough now to be covered on a classic policy. Mine is insured for £420 a year fully comp, agreed value & breakdown cover. You can choose how many miles per year you will be using it, this also helps bring the cost down.