Why is sportiness rated so high nowadays?

Why is sportiness rated so high nowadays?

Author
Discussion

Rushmore

Original Poster:

1,223 posts

143 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
There is nothing good connected to "Sport".

"Sporty Spice", now look at her gummy smile.
POLO Sport, ghastly clothes.
Range Rover Sport, driven by people who make loadsamoney in, wait, SPORTS.
Trainers, tracksuits, hoodies.
Sweat.
Hooligans.
Half-naked men hugging each other.

caraddict

1,092 posts

145 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
This is a good question. Maybe it's just me but even the comfy E-class gets a little bit sharper handling and ride every new generation.

I guess the majority of males pick the cars in the household and they want cars with a little "sport" (aka excitement) sprinkled on top. Wasn't the Ford S-max a mild shock to Ford as it sold so much better than they predicted?

Also, fresh (aka sporty) design sells better than boring, traditional design (I'm aware that this comes down to the car model/car brand image - read a school paper when I was in College about Toyota buyers actually preferring plain, very understated design...).

Johnnytheboy

24,498 posts

187 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
caraddict said:
Also, fresh (aka sporty) design sells better than boring, traditional design (I'm aware that this comes down to the car model/car brand image - read a school paper when I was in College about Toyota buyers actually preferring plain, very understated design...).
Of course one marketing strategy is to own multiple brands using the same platforms to target different consumers.

The obvious example of the VW Group: Seat tries (or tried) to project a young, sporty image while I often suspect Skoda make their cars dowdier than they have to in order to target a 'sensible' demographic.

busta

4,504 posts

234 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
Rushmore said:
Are "Sport" edition cars for grown-ups who are too shy to admit that they would secretly be a Halfrauds Dubscene hangaround but dont know how to use a spanner?
You raise a good point there. So many features we are now seeing on new mid-range cars are just spin-offs from the modifying scene 10 years ago.
LED lights.
Screens in the dashboard.
'Privacy' glass.
Big alloys, over-wide tyres and no suspension.
Keyless entry.
Remote start.

When someone puts the effort into fitting them to a hatchback people laugh and mock them, but when their company car has them as standard they become very cool?

Rushmore

Original Poster:

1,223 posts

143 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
Busta - thanks, and I'd like to add the clear-glass front/rear lights (even the current model Range Rover has hideous rear lighs which look like aftermarket stick-ons).

Rushmore

Original Poster:

1,223 posts

143 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
And - the sporty "stance" of an E class nowadays. Have you ever looked at the car sideways? The door handles and the sills are nearly 45degrees upwards, presumably to make it look more...(insert Auto journo jargon here).

What next? Cars standing on their nose?

leef44

4,401 posts

154 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
busta said:
You raise a good point there. So many features we are now seeing on new mid-range cars are just spin-offs from the modifying scene 10 years ago.
LED lights.
Screens in the dashboard.
'Privacy' glass.
Big alloys, over-wide tyres and no suspension.
Keyless entry.
Remote start.

When someone puts the effort into fitting them to a hatchback people laugh and mock them, but when their company car has them as standard they become very cool?
A couple of decades ago, in my boyracer days... I had a Mk1 Golf GTi. Black with red trim. Halfrauds was my favourite store. I got some red roll on strips to go along the side of the car. I'm sure I double the power and improved the handling immensely with my go-faster stripes. As long as I was convincedsilly

XitUp

7,690 posts

205 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
Rushmore said:
There is nothing good connected to "Sport".
I predict that you are either a chubber or a scrawny weed. Am I correct?

gradeA

651 posts

202 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
Ok, I'll bite - I've gone from a standard 1.9TDi A4 to a 2.8 V6 Quattro A4 with the factory sports suspension. Both '96 models, both with factory 16" wheels with 55-profile tyres.

The sports suspension is far, far better than the standard - corners nicely now without the horrific wallowiness or body roll that was evident on the standard kit, and loses very little if anything in the comfort stakes. Although, given that both cars are 15 years old and not on 19" wheels with 35-profile tyres, this may not be the same situation as with current cars... wink

anonymous-user

55 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
er, OP, you do know that you can always buy an "SE" or equivalent if you personally don't like the "sports" bits?


(except no one actually does, as modern cars look so much better as "sports" ;-)

Edited by anonymous-user on Saturday 9th June 18:08

Rushmore

Original Poster:

1,223 posts

143 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
Cornering could be vastly improved by having no suspension at all.

Debaser

5,987 posts

262 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
Because that's what the customers want.

Rushmore

Original Poster:

1,223 posts

143 months

Saturday 9th June 2012
quotequote all
Why isnt there a RR Phantom "Sport"??

Oh, wait, even bloody Maybach have an "S" model.