Cars you didn't know existed...

Cars you didn't know existed...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
CanAm said:
boyse7en said:
Most of the drag on a vehicle is created by the vortex at the rear of the vehicle. Although frontal area is also important, it is not the be-all and end-all of aerodynamic efficiency
Well as the total aero drag is frontal area X drag coefficient, I would say that it is. Unless by that you mean the shape of the front.
Not quite

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/shaped....

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
CanAm said:
boyse7en said:
Most of the drag on a vehicle is created by the vortex at the rear of the vehicle. Although frontal area is also important, it is not the be-all and end-all of aerodynamic efficiency
Well as the total aero drag is frontal area X drag coefficient, I would say that it is. Unless by that you mean the shape of the front.
Not quite

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/shaped....

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Thursday 16th May 2019
quotequote all
Hugo a Gogo said:
CanAm said:
boyse7en said:
Most of the drag on a vehicle is created by the vortex at the rear of the vehicle. Although frontal area is also important, it is not the be-all and end-all of aerodynamic efficiency
Well as the total aero drag is frontal area X drag coefficient, I would say that it is. Unless by that you mean the shape of the front.
Not quite

https://www.grc.nasa.gov/WWW/k-12/airplane/shaped....
what about the proximity effect of stationary ground

Hugo a Gogo

23,378 posts

234 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
Yes

aka_kerrly

12,419 posts

211 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
Fast Bug said:
Worthy of this thread?


Precursor to the Evoque
Another close but not quite from Rover. That is some comically large arch gap giving quite the faux by four off road appearance.


Mark-C

5,128 posts

206 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
aka_kerrly said:
Fast Bug said:
Worthy of this thread?


Precursor to the Evoque
Another close but not quite from Rover. That is some comically large arch gap giving quite the faux by four off road appearance.
That's just how commodity cars were back then before everything came with big alloys and rubber band tyres as a status symbol

AnneTeak

167 posts

110 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
Citroen ZX Volcane?



Hard to find sources to back up the claim, but it's believed to be the first diesel 'hot' hatch!

Also available at the time in 1.9 petrol and later a 2.0 version.

Try finding one now (how many left reckons 11 petrols and 34 diesels, down from 3k and 5k in 2001)!

Edited by AnneTeak on Friday 17th May 10:10

Matt Cup

3,162 posts

105 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
Didn’t realise the volcane was diesel, I thought they used the mi16 unit.

Scrump

22,056 posts

159 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
I had a ZX volcane diesel back in the day. Bought because I often visited a gas terminal and petrol cars were banned which meant a long walk. At the time the engine was a revelation for a diesel.
It was mechanically similar to a 306 dTurbo (I recall) but rarer.
Kept it for a few years, put lots of miles on it, taking it up to about 170k miles without issue. I sold it for almost what I paid for it.
Mine was similar to the one in the picture but it had clear fog lights (one of which was broken).

Mark-C

5,128 posts

206 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
So this talk of the Citroen ZX led me (via Wiki) to the discovery it was licensed to China which gave us the DongFeng-Citroen Fukang Pickup ... which is absolutely something I didn't know existed!


Matt Cup

3,162 posts

105 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
Mark-C said:
So this talk of the Citroen ZX led me (via Wiki) to the discovery it was licensed to China which gave us the DongFeng-Citroen Fukang Pickup ... which is absolutely something I didn't know existed!

“What pick-up? “ “It’s a Fukang Pickup!” hehe

can't remember

1,078 posts

129 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
I was looking on KaKa for a filter compatibility and came across this.





Apparently the AX wasn't flimsy enough so they decided to remove as much metal as possible and replace with Kinder egg spec plastic.

Mammasaid

3,851 posts

98 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
That does a disservice to Kinder eggs!

aka_kerrly

12,419 posts

211 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
Mark-C said:
aka_kerrly said:
Fast Bug said:
Worthy of this thread?


Precursor to the Evoque
Another close but not quite from Rover. That is some comically large arch gap giving quite the faux by four off road appearance.
That's just how commodity cars were back then before everything came with big alloys and rubber band tyres as a status symbol
I'm old enough to have owned/driven plenty of cars that came on 13 inch wheels with 175/60 tyres and when fitting 15s with 195/45 tyres was considered a hardcore upgradepaperbag

Butter Face

30,330 posts

161 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
aka_kerrly said:
Mark-C said:
aka_kerrly said:
Fast Bug said:
Worthy of this thread?


Precursor to the Evoque
Another close but not quite from Rover. That is some comically large arch gap giving quite the faux by four off road appearance.
That's just how commodity cars were back then before everything came with big alloys and rubber band tyres as a status symbol
I'm old enough to have owned/driven plenty of cars that came on 13 inch wheels with 175/60 tyres and when fitting 15s with 195/45 tyres was considered a hardcore upgradepaperbag
Pah, I remember having 10 inch wheels and fitting 13's was considered hardcore hehe

saaby93

32,038 posts

179 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
Butter Face said:
aka_kerrly said:
Mark-C said:
aka_kerrly said:
Fast Bug said:
Worthy of this thread?


Precursor to the Evoque
Another close but not quite from Rover. That is some comically large arch gap giving quite the faux by four off road appearance.
That's just how commodity cars were back then before everything came with big alloys and rubber band tyres as a status symbol
I'm old enough to have owned/driven plenty of cars that came on 13 inch wheels with 175/60 tyres and when fitting 15s with 195/45 tyres was considered a hardcore upgradepaperbag
Pah, I remember having 10 inch wheels and fitting 13's was considered hardcore hehe
Wasnt 13 a step too far?
couldnt you get 12s


Butter Face

30,330 posts

161 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
Butter Face said:
aka_kerrly said:
Mark-C said:
aka_kerrly said:
Fast Bug said:
Worthy of this thread?


Precursor to the Evoque
Another close but not quite from Rover. That is some comically large arch gap giving quite the faux by four off road appearance.
That's just how commodity cars were back then before everything came with big alloys and rubber band tyres as a status symbol
I'm old enough to have owned/driven plenty of cars that came on 13 inch wheels with 175/60 tyres and when fitting 15s with 195/45 tyres was considered a hardcore upgradepaperbag
Pah, I remember having 10 inch wheels and fitting 13's was considered hardcore hehe
Wasnt 13 a step too far?
couldnt you get 12s
13's were for the hardcore, 12's were for the wannabe badboys!

LuS1fer

41,137 posts

246 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
aka_kerrly said:
I'm old enough to have owned/driven plenty of cars that came on 13 inch wheels with 175/60 tyres and when fitting 15s with 195/45 tyres was considered a hardcore upgradepaperbag
When I was alas, an upgrade was from bendy crossplies to radial tyres. My hardcore upgrade on my A40 was 5.5" banded steel wheels wearing superwide 165/70 X 13s. Luckily, the suspension lowered itself, over time.

Fast Bug

11,707 posts

162 months

Friday 17th May 2019
quotequote all
Butter Face said:
Pah, I remember having 10 inch wheels and fitting 13's was considered hardcore hehe
I remember working at Vauxhall and we had a Calibra come in for new tyres on aftermarket 18" wheels. We all thought they were the size of dustbin lids laugh

Matt-il77s

330 posts

91 months

Saturday 18th May 2019
quotequote all
Don't see many of these about, Meriva VXR.



Looks to be based off the Corsa C but has the 180BHP 1.6T engine from the Corsa D VXR.

0-60 was 7.9s which doesn't seem that great considering the 1.8 N/A engine from the Corsa C Sri had a 0-60 of 8s?
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED