Which MX-5 version is best?

Which MX-5 version is best?

Author
Discussion

rufusgti

2,530 posts

192 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
I used the website posted earlier when we bought our second mx5 to find the spec I wanted.
We bought a Phoenix special edition. For me it's the best in terms of spec.

15" wheels, the lightest standard wheels, enkei 5 spokes. I didn't like the way the 16" wheels effect the ride.
Has the LSD.
5 speed box, didn't think much of the 6 speed cars I drove.
And has the best sound system, seats, extras.

I'm not sure on the spec but the arctic was I think the most classy looking of the mk2's

daemon

35,829 posts

197 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
Paddy_N_Murphy said:
OP, we will all recommend what we own. You DO know that.
I currently own none of them, but have owned a mk2.5 and a mk1.

The mk1 was the better car.

Tyrewrecker

6,419 posts

154 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
rufusgti said:
I used the website posted earlier when we bought our second mx5 to find the spec I wanted.
We bought a Phoenix special edition. For me it's the best in terms of spec.

15" wheels, the lightest standard wheels, enkei 5 spokes. I didn't like the way the 16" wheels effect the ride.
Has the LSD.
5 speed box, didn't think much of the 6 speed cars I drove.
And has the best sound system, seats, extras.

I'm not sure on the spec but the arctic was I think the most classy looking of the mk2's
14" BBS are actually the lightest standards.

Biccaroo

Original Poster:

393 posts

216 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
daemon said:
I currently own none of them, but have owned a mk2.5 and a mk1.

The mk1 was the better car.
So it would seem! So, if I was to look for a Mk1 version, which should I consider? I get the feeling searching for a good Mk1 could be a bit of a ball-ache though...

Tyrewrecker

6,419 posts

154 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
Biccaroo said:
So it would seem! So, if I was to look for a Mk1 version, which should I consider? I get the feeling searching for a good Mk1 could be a bit of a ball-ache though...
1994 eunos has best torsen diff

Just look for no rust. What are you after? Just a fun road car or are you planning on some track work? If so, you might want to look for one with appropriate mods.

caraddict

1,092 posts

144 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
GC8 said:
caraddict said:
What makes the Japanese version better?
Higher specification, better bits and all NBs had a six speed transmission and LSD. The later JDM NBs were rated at 160PS too.
Thanks.


______

Hmm, I've had MX-5 NA before... My scratch for a roadster is getting huge, and I was thinking about getting myself MX-5 NB next spring!

But this thread & the fact that I was on the track first time ever yesterday, has me wanting MX-5 NA again (raw = better in terms of small roadsters, if not I'd get an SLK!)! I missed the car so much after selling it, that I'm thinking about spending a little bit extra this time to get a perfect base car, and then just focus on it to make a raw semi street/track car... These are really cars to be kept in the long run.

I really like the look of those first generation, all-out, beefed up, mental looking trackday MX-5s! Anyone wanna share pics?

Edited by caraddict on Sunday 29th July 14:55

ambuletz

10,740 posts

181 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
Probably sounds abit silly saying it, but I much prefer the look of the import mk1 and mk2 MX-5s because they have the square shaped license plates front & back. Where as the UK ones get the ugly rectangular ones, ruins the curves of the front.

Tyrewrecker

6,419 posts

154 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
ambuletz said:
Probably sounds abit silly saying it, but I much prefer the look of the import mk1 and mk2 MX-5s because they have the square shaped license plates front & back. Where as the UK ones get the ugly rectangular ones, ruins the curves of the front.
I just love with mk1 because of the basicness and pop up lights smile

Alnassma

135 posts

141 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
I really crave the abilities MX-5 seems to have, but the name on the door leaves me cold for some reason. It just doesnt have the same "WANT" over it as a porsche.

Can see myself looking at it on the parking lot but not because of how it looks sadly... bit generic

Pints

18,444 posts

194 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
Alnassma said:
I really crave the abilities MX-5 seems to have, but the name on the door leaves me cold for some reason. It just doesnt have the same "WANT" over it as a porsche.

Can see myself looking at it on the parking lot but not because of how it looks sadly... bit generic
I don't think anyone buys the MX-5 because of the badge on the bonnet. If anything, you buy one in spite of the badge (with due respect to Mazda).

caraddict

1,092 posts

144 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
Pints said:
Alnassma said:
I really crave the abilities MX-5 seems to have, but the name on the door leaves me cold for some reason. It just doesnt have the same "WANT" over it as a porsche.

Can see myself looking at it on the parking lot but not because of how it looks sadly... bit generic
I don't think anyone buys the MX-5 because of the badge on the bonnet. If anything, you buy one in spite of the badge (with due respect to Mazda).
+1!

It's "just a good car".

V8Triumph

5,993 posts

215 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
Buy an MG Midget instead smile Much more fun, with just as many bits that you can buy to tune it. smile

Bonefish Blues

26,754 posts

223 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
rufusgti said:
I used the website posted earlier when we bought our second mx5 to find the spec I wanted.
We bought a Phoenix special edition. For me it's the best in terms of spec.

15" wheels, the lightest standard wheels, enkei 5 spokes. I didn't like the way the 16" wheels effect the ride.
Has the LSD.
5 speed box, didn't think much of the 6 speed cars I drove.
And has the best sound system, seats, extras.

I'm not sure on the spec but the arctic was I think the most classy looking of the mk2's
If we were buying again, then we wouldn't get a Mk 2.5 Sport again ('box not terribly good, overwheeled with 16s), I'd adopt the approach outlined above.

Biccaroo

Original Poster:

393 posts

216 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
Paddy_N_Murphy said:
For me, the accessibility of a cracking fun car, that can be cheaply tinkered to gain a 1% or 2% here and there, for as little as a Bag of Sand is what the MX5 is about. YET is not a necessity.

You would st yourself running a Porker bought for 5 grand for the fear of bills (I am talking of Boxster's / 911's not the front engined stuff).

I was recalling the day I bought mine just yesterday. I have had it 14 yrs.
I knew within 2 miles I had to have one.
Couldn't afford it, but bought it.

It is now a little like triggers broom due to 'rust correction' but still goes great.
Rust is what kills Jap cars (my previous Trooper is another example).
I currently own an MR2 Mk3. I cannot fault it in any way other than the lack of storage space which makes it completely impractical. I therefore want to replace it with a slightly more practical vehicle without sacrificing the fantastic driving experience the Toyota provides. Hence, I've considered many, many options but PHer's always tend to suggest the MX-5 as the ultimate, affordable solution.

The relevance to this post is that I (obviously) considered a Boxster as the ideal replacement, but I've been scared off by the high running costs (fuel, tyres, maintenance, brakes, etc...). I can afford to run a Boxster but do I really, consciously WANT to foot those bills for a car that doesn't provide a great deal more than the cheaper more accessible MX-5 or MR2?

rufusgti

2,530 posts

192 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
Bonefish Blues said:
rufusgti said:
I used the website posted earlier when we bought our second mx5 to find the spec I wanted.
We bought a Phoenix special edition. For me it's the best in terms of spec.

15" wheels, the lightest standard wheels, enkei 5 spokes. I didn't like the way the 16" wheels effect the ride.
Has the LSD.
5 speed box, didn't think much of the 6 speed cars I drove.
And has the best sound system, seats, extras.

I'm not sure on the spec but the arctic was I think the most classy looking of the mk2's
If we were buying again, then we wouldn't get a Mk 2.5 Sport again ('box not terribly good, overwheeled with 16s), I'd adopt the approach outlined above.
We were lucky to be fair. We already had a mk2 sport an early S plate. Fantastic car but suffered reliability issues. Having said that, by the time we sold it it drove very very well indeed. But the love was gone.

When we decided to view some newer mk2.5's we headed straight for the sports with the 16" wheels and six speeders. It was only due to our previous ownership that we found these not to be worthwhile extras. I'd imagine without previously having one we would have been more than happy with them.

I think the beauty of the mx5 is the sheer amount of different specs available. I would advise anyone going into mx5 ownershipe to have a look at the spec list deciding on exactly what they need from it. Then just match up using the link provided to select the appropriate model.

For me it had to be the Phoenix but everyone wants something different. I'd say as long as it has the LSD you won't go too far wrong, but you may aswell spec your exact needs. There's no shortage of them.

NRS

22,174 posts

201 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
Pints said:
Alnassma said:
I really crave the abilities MX-5 seems to have, but the name on the door leaves me cold for some reason. It just doesnt have the same "WANT" over it as a porsche.

Can see myself looking at it on the parking lot but not because of how it looks sadly... bit generic
I don't think anyone buys the MX-5 because of the badge on the bonnet. If anything, you buy one in spite of the badge (with due respect to Mazda).
Someone once spat on my car at the lights! Was very surprised to say the least!

Biccaroo

Original Poster:

393 posts

216 months

Biccaroo

Original Poster:

393 posts

216 months

Tyrewrecker

6,419 posts

154 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
No and No for me. One is a 1.6 one is a UK car and over priced.

Biccaroo

Original Poster:

393 posts

216 months

Sunday 29th July 2012
quotequote all
Tyrewrecker said:
No and No for me. One is a 1.6 one is a UK car and over priced.
Good. No messing around. This could take some time... !