What car, Discovery 4 or X5?

What car, Discovery 4 or X5?

Author
Discussion

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
longblackcoat said:
Zod said:
I don't have any in-gear figures, but the 0-60 figures tell a tale: the current Discovery manages 0-60 in 9 seconds, vs 7.8 sseconds for the X5 30d, 6.5 seconds for the 40d and 5.5 seconds for the 50d.The Discovery is s l o w .
And the 0-60 has relevance how often?

Mid-range, there's not a lot in it (though I admit the 50d will be well ahead). That said, my D3 has been mildly fettled and is a lot quicker than the standard for a very small outlay. The speed's irrelevant - the real limiting factor is the sheer weight of the thing. Not that the X5's a lot better in this regard.

Edited by longblackcoat on Thursday 27th September 17:06
Weight's largely irrelevant once the thing is moving. If you look above, you'll see that 1. I quoted 0-60 for want of in-gear figures and 2. 0-60 is still useful inthat it gives an idea of the 30-60 part of 0-60.

bodhi

10,540 posts

230 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
A couple of the guys at work have D3's, and we have popped out for lunch in them a few times. Once the engine comes to terms with the weight of the thing they aren't too bad, still no ball of fire and far too slow for me, but not as bad as you would expect.

Economy on them is horrendous though. One chap struggles to get into the 20's, and the other has just traded his for a D4, and was beaming about getting 27 out of that one.

Some of the bills they recieve come service time are fairly eye-watering as well. Don't think I've heard one under 4 figures yet, wheel bearings and suspension components appear to be made of cheese.

If it was my money I'd take the X5 every time, just as they are such a giggle to drive.

jonnynine11

Original Poster:

117 posts

164 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
onesickpuppy said:
Did you tilt the 2nd row forward?
No, the person who was showing me, sort of slid it forward and then tilted the backrest forward looked like squeeze.

longblackcoat

5,047 posts

184 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
Zod said:
Weight's largely irrelevant once the thing is moving. If you look above, you'll see that 1. I quoted 0-60 for want of in-gear figures and 2. 0-60 is still useful inthat it gives an idea of the 30-60 part of 0-60.
The weight is very relevant when cornering, let me assure you!


jonnynine11

Original Poster:

117 posts

164 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
To the guys quoting performance figures, they're not that important to me really, this car isn't for speeding about especially with all the kids in. I'm sure either will have enough poke and cruise at 80ish.

eck c

345 posts

195 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
D4

Next question please

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
longblackcoat said:
The weight is very relevant when cornering, let me assure you!
Yes, I'm very much aware of that, thank you. I leave the enthusiastic cornering to my other car.

Zod

35,295 posts

259 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
jonnynine11 said:
onesickpuppy said:
Did you tilt the 2nd row forward?
No, the person who was showing me, sort of slid it forward and then tilted the backrest forward looked like squeeze.
He did it wrong. The seats move in multiple ways and he should have tilted the whole thing forward, not just the backrest.

onesickpuppy

2,648 posts

158 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
Zod said:
He did it wrong. The seats move in multiple ways and he should have tilted the whole thing forward, not just the backrest.
Correct. The larger lever slides and tilts the 2nd row. Not a BMW dealer then?

jonnynine11

Original Poster:

117 posts

164 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
onesickpuppy said:
Correct. The larger lever slides and tilts the 2nd row. Not a BMW dealer then?
Nope, looks like the BM could be back in the running. Back to the original plan of trying them both with all the kids.

onesickpuppy

2,648 posts

158 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
jonnynine11 said:
Nope, looks like the BM could be back in the running. Back to the original plan of trying them both with all the kids.
Just taken this, it will give you a VERY rough idea as my 6yo was on the camera and it's dark...

Clicky.

XTR2Turbo

1,533 posts

232 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
I had a D3 in the fleet for 7 years and just changed it for a D4 so clearly biassed but my brother bought is wife an x5 and I have spent some time in it also.

For me pro's and cons are:

D4 - neutral image, far more comfortable ride and quieter especially road noise, seats folded massive loadbay, full 7 seats, winter capability without changing wheels and tyres, elevated driving position, towing capability

X5 - perhaps cheaper to run (tax, service, fuel etc but may be offset by insurance, tyres and depreciation), faster, slightly smaller for parking, greater flexibility over options and colour schemes if buying new.


If a D4 I would definitely try to stretch to the 8 speed. Personally I think that the character of the car is about wafting in comfort but it is certainly not slow when required.

There may be other factors for you like location of dealer etc As ever, try and borrow one of each for exteneded test drive before buying.

Edited by XTR2Turbo on Thursday 27th September 19:47

A.J.M

7,919 posts

187 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
http://www.autocar.co.uk/car-review/land-rover/dis...

Basically, the only in it's armour is the fact the X5 3.0 is faster. But otherwise the D4 is the better all round car.

My D3 is a fantastic car, it's effortless to drive on the motorway, great around town with the autobox and the bluff shape is easy to place both in daily driving and in parking spaces.

Fuel economy is a weak point and the 2.7 i have is slow, but a £400 remap is on the card's and will help the speed side and maybe add 2-3mpg.

David911RSR

1,445 posts

211 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
whoami said:
Zod said:
St John Smythe said:
Zod said:
300bhp/ton said:
Zod said:
I don't have any in-gear figures, but the 0-60 figures tell a tale: the current Discovery manages 0-60 in 9 seconds, vs 7.8 sseconds for the X5 30d, 6.5 seconds for the 40d and 5.5 seconds for the 50d.The Discovery is s l o w .
Yes it is. But it's still quite capable of using the road network without holding things up and I think they feel more pokey than the stats suggest.
It's not the slowest thing around, but if you want to have a bit of real poke, don't buy the Discovery. I find the 40d loaner we currently have to be quick enough, just.
Last thing I'd be worrying about with a 4x4 is the 0-60 time to be honest.
It's jsu tindicative, given I don't have in-gear figures to hand. These are mostly driven as cars. If, as I did the other week, you are doing a lot of driving on Yoirkshire and Lincolnshire B roads and want to make progress, you need an accelerative car.
I live amongst Yorkshire B roads and the D4 was just fine.

I don't think you've driven one Zod?

+ 1

I'm not really sure who buys this sort of car to transport their family around who really puts 0-60 figures at the top of their list of priorities.

As has been said, it has boat loads of torque and in real life driving (Yorkshire B roads included), it's actually a great drive.

I remember that you used to slag off Aston Martin as their cars were too slow.

And then you actually drove one... smile

morgrp

4,128 posts

199 months

Thursday 27th September 2012
quotequote all
One's mumsie and the other one's git-ish - I'd take the land rover - if you like acting like a tool, driving up people's arses and doing 130+mph on the m25 I'd go for a range rover sport - if you're normal get the disco although I have heard some of the hardware is a bit flakey. The x5's not too bad but I just couldnt live with those "cartoon" like looks - comparatively, the land rover's very attractive

jonnynine11

Original Poster:

117 posts

164 months

Friday 28th September 2012
quotequote all
onesickpuppy said:
Just taken this, it will give you a VERY rough idea as my 6yo was on the camera and it's dark...

Clicky.
Appreciate the link, I can't see it though frown

onesickpuppy

2,648 posts

158 months

Friday 28th September 2012
quotequote all
jonnynine11 said:
Appreciate the link, I can't see it though frown
Sorry, I'd stupidly left it on the default private setting. Try this video.

whoami

13,151 posts

241 months

Friday 28th September 2012
quotequote all
onesickpuppy said:
jonnynine11 said:
Appreciate the link, I can't see it though frown
Sorry, I'd stupidly left it on the default private setting. Try this video.
No. Not working either.

onesickpuppy

2,648 posts

158 months

Saturday 29th September 2012
quotequote all
whoami said:
No. Not working either.
Oh FFS! YouTube keep 'rejecting' it. Why the fk they'd reject a video of an X5's rear seats I have no idea. I'll try to pop up some pics later.

jonnynine11

Original Poster:

117 posts

164 months

Sunday 7th October 2012
quotequote all
Put a deposit on an X5 today. The seats were fine and we should get a few years out of it with the kids.