RE: Fiat 500 roadster concepts
Discussion
300bhp/ton said:
ImDesigner said:
You really think you know it all don't you?
Clueless.
No I don't think I know it all. Not even close. But please explain to me the logic of sketching something that has exactly 100% no chance of working or being possible. Even more so when based on a current model of know dimensions.Clueless.
Evidently it was 100% possible.
Francis Dolarhyde is a very interesting character. I can understand people's fascination with aberrant behaviour. Psychopathy is the greatest fiction or fabrication dramatised within a human psyche, experiencing it as reality. I think it is why I like baiting people who are prejudiced, in any form. You give someone's agenda a morsel on which to feast and their true beliefs will find its way to the surface.
Edward Said and Homi Bhabha wrote on the nature of prejudice when discussing Orinetalism. They explored how Otherness is the playground of all prejudice and show how language is not an inert substance. Language brings everything into being but requires context, and it is ideology that gives the context. Whilst this happens language takes on all kinds of implicit and explicit meanings as operators of that language use it to support the tenets of that ideology.
Any prejudice you can think of, they all depend on implied meaning or, to put it another way... STEREOTYPES.
Later Michel Foucault would be one of many proponents who identified that gay people are usually spoken about - look at that, language at work again - purely in terms of their sexuality, and by that the best reduction of that statement can be simplified as legitimised targets for aggression or violence because of their Otherness.
Actions undertaken from this premise as its drive are concluded to be hate crimes.
Is any one starting to understand how serious this is yet?
I put it in simple terms of noun and adjective to weed out people who understand the difference. The best interpretation of your remarks is that you are playing the part of an unwitting accomplice to prejudicial beliefs. In which case, there is still hope for you.
At worst, no quantity of adjectives or nouns could capture how displaceable a creature you are.
Sorry for anyone on this thread if it has bummed you out, but as I said before I don't back down. And it isn't a-from-the-comfort-and-safety-of-my-sofa-thing. I take great pleasure being the guy who pulls someone in the street for spouting racist crap, for bullying his girlfriend or wife, for abusing an animal. The look on their face is priceless when they look round to see me standing there. They expect it to be some soft sh**e. It drives my Mrs up the wall. She knows now that it's something I can't switch off.
I suppose it is the result of educating someone from a questionable environment. I still like to beat the s
t out of people. Now I do it to people who deserve it.
If you think you have a response to make please save your breath. You're not in my league.
Edward Said and Homi Bhabha wrote on the nature of prejudice when discussing Orinetalism. They explored how Otherness is the playground of all prejudice and show how language is not an inert substance. Language brings everything into being but requires context, and it is ideology that gives the context. Whilst this happens language takes on all kinds of implicit and explicit meanings as operators of that language use it to support the tenets of that ideology.
Any prejudice you can think of, they all depend on implied meaning or, to put it another way... STEREOTYPES.
Later Michel Foucault would be one of many proponents who identified that gay people are usually spoken about - look at that, language at work again - purely in terms of their sexuality, and by that the best reduction of that statement can be simplified as legitimised targets for aggression or violence because of their Otherness.
Actions undertaken from this premise as its drive are concluded to be hate crimes.
Is any one starting to understand how serious this is yet?
I put it in simple terms of noun and adjective to weed out people who understand the difference. The best interpretation of your remarks is that you are playing the part of an unwitting accomplice to prejudicial beliefs. In which case, there is still hope for you.
At worst, no quantity of adjectives or nouns could capture how displaceable a creature you are.
Sorry for anyone on this thread if it has bummed you out, but as I said before I don't back down. And it isn't a-from-the-comfort-and-safety-of-my-sofa-thing. I take great pleasure being the guy who pulls someone in the street for spouting racist crap, for bullying his girlfriend or wife, for abusing an animal. The look on their face is priceless when they look round to see me standing there. They expect it to be some soft sh**e. It drives my Mrs up the wall. She knows now that it's something I can't switch off.
I suppose it is the result of educating someone from a questionable environment. I still like to beat the s
t out of people. Now I do it to people who deserve it.If you think you have a response to make please save your breath. You're not in my league.
If you're not a troll then you're a complete tosser!!
Are you the super hero that Marvel Comics forgot to publish? Prejudice Man?
Appearing when someone uses prejudice against a person or animal and then beating them up.
Obviously you qualify yourself as the judge and jury when you decide that a case you stumble upon requires corporal punishment.
Us people who are intelligent enough not to feel we have to tell everyone else how intelligent we are live in a much more advanced society, please stay up north!!
Are you the super hero that Marvel Comics forgot to publish? Prejudice Man?
Appearing when someone uses prejudice against a person or animal and then beating them up.
Obviously you qualify yourself as the judge and jury when you decide that a case you stumble upon requires corporal punishment.
Us people who are intelligent enough not to feel we have to tell everyone else how intelligent we are live in a much more advanced society, please stay up north!!
porsche200471 said:
Grew up on a council estate in the North East of England. Quite a rough place. "I weight 110Kg and 81% of that is muscle and bone" can't tolerate stupidity from people who are too lazy to be intelligent.
I think you will find that approx. 57% of your body is water .... 
porsche200471 said:
Francis Dolarhyde is a very interesting character. I can understand people's fascination with aberrant behaviour. Psychopathy is the greatest fiction or fabrication dramatised within a human psyche, experiencing it as reality. I think it is why I like baiting people who are prejudiced, in any form. You give someone's agenda a morsel on which to feast and their true beliefs will find its way to the surface.
Edward Said and Homi Bhabha wrote on the nature of prejudice when discussing Orinetalism. They explored how Otherness is the playground of all prejudice and show how language is not an inert substance. Language brings everything into being but requires context, and it is ideology that gives the context. Whilst this happens language takes on all kinds of implicit and explicit meanings as operators of that language use it to support the tenets of that ideology.
Any prejudice you can think of, they all depend on implied meaning or, to put it another way... STEREOTYPES.
Later Michel Foucault would be one of many proponents who identified that gay people are usually spoken about - look at that, language at work again - purely in terms of their sexuality, and by that the best reduction of that statement can be simplified as legitimised targets for aggression or violence because of their Otherness.
Actions undertaken from this premise as its drive are concluded to be hate crimes.
Is any one starting to understand how serious this is yet?
I put it in simple terms of noun and adjective to weed out people who understand the difference. The best interpretation of your remarks is that you are playing the part of an unwitting accomplice to prejudicial beliefs. In which case, there is still hope for you.
At worst, no quantity of adjectives or nouns could capture how displaceable a creature you are.
Sorry for anyone on this thread if it has bummed you out, but as I said before I don't back down. And it isn't a-from-the-comfort-and-safety-of-my-sofa-thing. I take great pleasure being the guy who pulls someone in the street for spouting racist crap, for bullying his girlfriend or wife, for abusing an animal. The look on their face is priceless when they look round to see me standing there. They expect it to be some soft sh**e. It drives my Mrs up the wall. She knows now that it's something I can't switch off.
I suppose it is the result of educating someone from a questionable environment. I still like to beat the st out of people. Now I do it to people who deserve it.
If you think you have a response to make please save your breath. You're not in my league.
I have ignored your every post, but please for people that actually wish to read themEdward Said and Homi Bhabha wrote on the nature of prejudice when discussing Orinetalism. They explored how Otherness is the playground of all prejudice and show how language is not an inert substance. Language brings everything into being but requires context, and it is ideology that gives the context. Whilst this happens language takes on all kinds of implicit and explicit meanings as operators of that language use it to support the tenets of that ideology.
Any prejudice you can think of, they all depend on implied meaning or, to put it another way... STEREOTYPES.
Later Michel Foucault would be one of many proponents who identified that gay people are usually spoken about - look at that, language at work again - purely in terms of their sexuality, and by that the best reduction of that statement can be simplified as legitimised targets for aggression or violence because of their Otherness.
Actions undertaken from this premise as its drive are concluded to be hate crimes.
Is any one starting to understand how serious this is yet?
I put it in simple terms of noun and adjective to weed out people who understand the difference. The best interpretation of your remarks is that you are playing the part of an unwitting accomplice to prejudicial beliefs. In which case, there is still hope for you.
At worst, no quantity of adjectives or nouns could capture how displaceable a creature you are.
Sorry for anyone on this thread if it has bummed you out, but as I said before I don't back down. And it isn't a-from-the-comfort-and-safety-of-my-sofa-thing. I take great pleasure being the guy who pulls someone in the street for spouting racist crap, for bullying his girlfriend or wife, for abusing an animal. The look on their face is priceless when they look round to see me standing there. They expect it to be some soft sh**e. It drives my Mrs up the wall. She knows now that it's something I can't switch off.
I suppose it is the result of educating someone from a questionable environment. I still like to beat the s
t out of people. Now I do it to people who deserve it.If you think you have a response to make please save your breath. You're not in my league.
Use
Some
Paragraph
Spacing!!!!!!!!!
However procrastinastic Porsche 200471 is or isn't, he sums up what I was trying to point out at the start, but that 300 could only 'disagree' with.
Concept cars made real, at motor shows, with all the necessary proportion and engineering required to produce, sometimes don't make production, more often than not really...so conceptual sketches don't even have to go that far. Whoever penned this, will doubtless be able to re-produce drawings that align with what the reality would be, but in the conceptual stage you don't have to...it's as clear as day to anyone remotely interested in design (and not just cars) that at the initial stage you sketch, just pour out ideas, mad ones, bad ones and ones that can be developed. If there is any frustration to feel, feel frustrated that they were published on here and that you misinterpreted them.
Concept cars made real, at motor shows, with all the necessary proportion and engineering required to produce, sometimes don't make production, more often than not really...so conceptual sketches don't even have to go that far. Whoever penned this, will doubtless be able to re-produce drawings that align with what the reality would be, but in the conceptual stage you don't have to...it's as clear as day to anyone remotely interested in design (and not just cars) that at the initial stage you sketch, just pour out ideas, mad ones, bad ones and ones that can be developed. If there is any frustration to feel, feel frustrated that they were published on here and that you misinterpreted them.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff