RE: Aston Martin 'not lazy' - official

[Zod]

Pr1964 said:

Zod said:

Given Aston's record annual sales number is c.6000, pr1964's post, like all his others in this thread is worthless.

That's like saying because all recent aston's look the same (like a Mitsubishi GTO) then all Aston martins are st.

Nonsense.

You are not exactly helping your case with that.

[George H]

Pr1964 said:

I know one slip up and it's handbags at dawn....

I think it's more aimed at your constant whinging about Aston rather than you getting the figures wrong. If you don't like Astons - don't buy one. It's quite simple, but you seem to want to just try and pit everyone off them by coming up with utter bks.

Here's a few examples:

Pr1964 said:

An Austin Westminster from the 60's has more class in one door handle than any recent Aston Martin.

I didn't realise that class could be measured.

Pr1964 said:

Without 007 it would be just another bankrupt British car company.

I do not know of one Aston owner who has bought a car because of the James Bond connection. Go ask on the Aston forum to see how many have?

Pr1964 said:

Astons ALL look the bloody SAME !!!!!

VH doesn't work !

WTF is wrong with AM ? Ferrari can make beautiful cars every few years AM make the SAME car for YEARS AND YEARS .....


LAZY the end.

I'm not even going to bother explaining why Astons look similar to each other again because you're obviously too thick to understand.

Pr1964 said:

Nope the early V8V's have a much better quality about them nice leather etc.

The One-77 was a very limited run pity the regular cars arn't as nice looking.

The Jag's there to show how Aston Martins look cheap because they look a lot more like Jags than Astons.

so despite you saying all Astons look the same, you say the One-77 looks different? Well done for contradicting yourself. And to say that Aston have copied off Jags design is laughable.

[George H]

Pr1964 said:

I must be too thick to understand,,,,,,

I concur. At least we have been able to agree on something.