Tyre labels

Author
Discussion

long time lurker

302 posts

151 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
well on that site many cheap tryes don't even have a rating!! I wonder why?? yikes

My Pirellis get an E (economy) and B (wet) rating (well my cars economy is already crap! but i suppose it shows the tryes must be gripping well)

Pints

Original Poster:

18,444 posts

195 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
My tyres are rated:
E - Economy
B - Wet
C - Noise

kambites

67,623 posts

222 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Mine aren't even on there but I'd imagine they'll be terrible in all categories. Cut slicks aren't really designed for any of the things they're measuring. hehe

mrmr96

13,736 posts

205 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
BFG TERRANO said:
It's a farce. Government box ticking game. The margins between the scores are minimal. So many other factors affect co2 figures its laughable. Pressure, tracking, balance, servicing, driver technique, weather the list goes on.
Well yeah, obviously. But none of those things are affected by choice of tyre. So surely you can see the value in determining what effect IS being made by the tyre? (i.e. assuming all else is consistent.)

mrmr96

13,736 posts

205 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
jayfrancis said:
So if I wanted to do some research into buying new tyres, is this information available anywhere other than on a sticker stuck on the tread?

If not, what's the point. How often do you get to see the tyres fitted to your car before they're fitted? If it's a sticker stuck to the tread all that info will be gone after half a mile of driving.

Pointless waste of time and money unless the info is available elsewhere.
It'll be next to the tyres on the website when you order them. See mytyres for example.

nosittap

381 posts

146 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Quentin Wilson on BBC breakfast made me laugh when refering to ditchfinder brands as 'wing wang wong' branded tyres, it's like something your slightly racist nan would say. laugh

3 categories are not enough to make an informed choice about tyres, however anything that helps the general population buy a better and safer tyre can't be a bad thing.

Someone might have bought the cheapest one previously, but with the new system they might buy the cheapest with good wet braking performace instead. But on the other hand it may give them a false confidence in the wet, and they might be supprised when they end up in a hedge, scratching their heads, "how come I crashed, I have A rated tyres?"


Benny Saltstein

648 posts

214 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
The Michelin PEs on my Legacy score an F for efficiency. The Bridgestone RE050s I had previously a G - presumably all grippy "performance" tyres will suffer?

kambites

67,623 posts

222 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Benny Saltstein said:
The Michelin PEs on my Legacy score an F for efficiency. The Bridgestone RE050s I had previously a G - presumably all grippy "performance" tyres will suffer?
I suspect width has more effect than compound or tread pattern. It looks like each side of each tyre is tested independently and consequently has different results.

Benny Saltstein

648 posts

214 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Is there a negative correlation between rolling resistence and efficiency? I'd assume a grippier tyre had a higher rolling resistence.

kambites

67,623 posts

222 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Benny Saltstein said:
Is there a negative correlation between rolling resistence and efficiency? I'd assume a grippier tyre had a higher rolling resistence.
There is a very strong positive correlation, but I don't think that's what you meant to ask. smile

Dave Hedgehog

14,584 posts

205 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
the important stats are missing, max lateral g and dry stopping distance smile

Mr Whippy

29,085 posts

242 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
E,A,70 for mine.

Bit weird that they are an E... I think the economy is amazing from them.

I don't think I'd be getting any significantly higher mpg by moving to super-eco tyres... drag from tyres can't be THAT much and indeed varies depending on the car itself and it's basic frictional losses.

Bit silly imo.

Dave

underphil

1,246 posts

211 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
It's kind of a good idea - but most people still won't take any notice of the labels,

just today, young colleague next to me needs a tyre, phones one place who quote £80 for something decent, doesn't like it, phones 2nd place with remit "cheapest tyre you've got" and they say £50. then tells everyone that the 2nd place were great as they saved him £30 (and that a tyre is a tyre)

Pints

Original Poster:

18,444 posts

195 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
underphil said:
"a tyre is a tyre"
My work colleagues say this occasionally just to wind me up.

Shaw Tarse

31,544 posts

204 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Pints said:
underphil said:
"a tyre is a tyre"
My work colleagues say this occasionally just to wind me up.
But it is the way many people think!

kambites

67,623 posts

222 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Mr Whippy said:
E,A,70 for mine.

Bit weird that they are an E... I think the economy is amazing from them.
Try sticking 125 width tyres on and see what it does to your economy. I doubt anything as wide as you have will score better than about D or C.

Pints

Original Poster:

18,444 posts

195 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
I'll admit I don't have the most expensive rubber on my car but it's an OEM brand for some manufacturers and comes with decent reviews.

The fact that many are happy sticking tyres on that make LingLongs look premium should be a worry for the rest of us who have to share the road with these people.

Mr Whippy

29,085 posts

242 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
A tyre is a tyre for people who buy cars based on the advert or what colour you can get it in, or if it has a cup holder.

Chances are they won't care how far it takes to stop because they don't even know that a shorter distance is a good thing biggrin

Dave

mrmr96

13,736 posts

205 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
[Devils Advocate]
Surely it's a misconception that "cheap tyres are dangerous"?

Lets assume we're not talking about the chance they'll explode, and rather just focus on their lower grip vs. premium tyres.

Well surely the answer if you're running on budgets is to slow down, and leave bigger gaps? EVERYONE has less grip when it rains, and we all manage. EVERYONE has less grip when it's icy, and again, most of us manager. So a budget tyre in the dry may be similar to a premium in a wet, and a budget tyre in the wet like a premium one on ice. A budget one on ice will be similar to a premium one on slightly more ice wink

Of course there's an advantage to having more grip, but I don't think it's necessarily as bad as some on this thread would make out.
[/Devils Advocate]

aw51 121565

4,771 posts

234 months

Thursday 1st November 2012
quotequote all
Drop Test b3nxj said:
Thought this was already on all tyresconfused

Tread wear, Traction, Temprature

IIRC
Yes, it's on every tyre - but now a tyre will have a label (somehow) similar to those that new cars and fridges have had for some time (it will have more parameters than just "overall efficiency" though) wink . That's my understanding of it anyway confused and it seems pointless - like a Kindle, an answer to a question nobody asked but some can justify it.