Your power VS tyre width ratio
Discussion
Re-watched the Harris "C63 on space savers" video last night, and it got me wondering what is the worst (best) tyre VS power ratio? ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HPh90yNX-mY ), and what do we all have?
His claim of the C63 AMG being one of the best was based on:
480bhp / (255*2) wide tyres = 0.94bhp per MM.
368 lb/ft / (255*2) = 0.72 lb/ft per MM.
Only the driven wheels count. We should categorise super exotics separately from sub 100k cars.
My M3 has 358 / 255, so a lowly 0.7 bhp/MM. Something like a supercharged VX8 must be in with a good shout?
Edited for Mike.
His claim of the C63 AMG being one of the best was based on:
480bhp / (255*2) wide tyres = 0.94bhp per MM.
368 lb/ft / (255*2) = 0.72 lb/ft per MM.
Only the driven wheels count. We should categorise super exotics separately from sub 100k cars.
My M3 has 358 / 255, so a lowly 0.7 bhp/MM. Something like a supercharged VX8 must be in with a good shout?
Edited for Mike.
Edited by jon- on Tuesday 11th December 10:35
Mr2Mike said:
Shouldn't that be 480/(255*2) = 0.94 bhp/mm as there are two driven wheels?
I might be the loser here (in the 'car' category, I'm sure there are trucks/4x4s that are worse)Volvo V60 1.6d R-Design (small engine, big wheels)
235/40R18 and 115bhp
gives 115 / (235x2) = 0.25 bhp/mm
ETA: I don't even know if I have traction control as I haven't managed to spin the wheels yet.
Both my cars have 160bhp, one uses 185 rear tyres, the other is currently on 235 (up from the standard 225).
MX5 Turbo: 0.865bhp/mm
Elise 160: 0.681bhp/mm (0.711bhp/mm standard)
My old 535 was 0.974bhp/mm
The one with the middle score is the only one that ever has traction problems. Odd.
MX5 Turbo: 0.865bhp/mm
Elise 160: 0.681bhp/mm (0.711bhp/mm standard)
My old 535 was 0.974bhp/mm
The one with the middle score is the only one that ever has traction problems. Odd.
kambites said:
Surely it should be power/weight/tyre width? Absolute power means nothing. Plenty of low-powered Caterhams, etc. out there that can light up their rear wheels easily enough.
Indeed, some interesting results- C63 AMG: 256bhp per T / 2x255mm = 0.50
Caterham Roadsport (1.6 Sigma) 227bhp per T / 2x185mm= 0.61
Caterham R500: 520bhp per T / 2x215mm = 1.21
The C63 should be on some 155s
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff