RE: You Know You Want To: Bugatti EB110 SS

RE: You Know You Want To: Bugatti EB110 SS

Author
Discussion

Crunchy Nutter

246 posts

194 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
"Also, F40s are available now for less, and they're appreciating too..."

I was drooling over the EB110 until I read this line. And now if I win big on the Lotto there's no way I'd go for the Bugatti. F40 all the way. Preferably the only right-hand-drive one ever made.

Dreamspeed

230 posts

149 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
If you think it's ugly, take a look at the Edonis which is based on the Bugatti EB110. I quite like the EB110, just needs work around the headlights. wink

Stingercut

217 posts

167 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
It only looks good from the side. For similar original form power outputs its impressive this Bug can stretch its top speed to 220mph compared to a 458's 198.

spadgm

140 posts

205 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
I remember reading an article in a magazine on the Bugatti ss many years ago, and Micheal Schumacher was saying he was driving his one down the autobahn at 340kph and it felt slow!
Does anyone remember that article or have a copy of it?

Wolands Advocate

2,495 posts

216 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Oh yes indeedy, I've always wanted one of these!

Back in 1994, when these were the latest supercar to hit the market, I got taken for a spin through Provence in a steel grey SS (and yes it was the SS version) by the guy who had the Bugatti concession for France. I was 17 at the time and will never, ever forget the acceleration.

First time I'd ever experienced proper G-forces in the car. I'm working on memories from over 18 years ago, but my recollection is that it's a quad-turbo engine and the turbos kick in sequentially so that you get a series of thumps in the back as the car fires itself up the road.

Being only 17 and despite my freshly-minted UK driving licence, I wasn't allowed anywhere near the controls, but my father (who used to be in the Fleet Air Arm) did get to have a drive in it and afterwards remarked (i) that it was the closest thing he'd ever experienced to being catapulted off the deck of an aircraft carrier in a fighter jet and (ii) that it was a remarkably easy and friendly car to drive.

Gorbyrev

1,160 posts

154 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Real dark horse. Perhaps will struggle to gain value while F40's are cheaper. Beware that 2010 Veyron, its only a few thousand miles from a tyre change rofl

Ozzie Osmond

21,189 posts

246 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
rumple said:
DaveyBoyDave said:
I know beauty is subjective and everything, but by the beard of Zeus those things are ugly.
Thought it was only me, looks like a 300zx has driven through Halfords covered in Superglueyikes
Agreed. A severe case of "the Emperor's new clothes". Horrid thing - no wonder the customers stayed away in droves. It's the car which sank the attempted Bugatti revival by Artioli. He even bought Lotus to try to save his doomed project but that didn't work either.

Mark-C

5,098 posts

205 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
There was a thread around recently about cars with presence. Used to see an EB110 regularly on the Hethel Road near Lotus in the late 90s ... and boy did it have presence in bundles. Not pretty by any stretch but brutally efficient looking.

Would still put my spare half million (as if!) somewhere else though ...

Wolands Advocate

2,495 posts

216 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Ozzie Osmond said:
Agreed. A severe case of "the Emperor's new clothes". Horrid thing - no wonder the customers stayed away in droves. It's the car which sank the attempted Bugatti revival by Artioli. He even bought Lotus to try to save his doomed project but that didn't work either.
Horrid to look at perhaps (looks being subjective). Not at all horrid to drive.

The Wookie

13,950 posts

228 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
PH said:
it's a 600hp, 220mph V12 Italian supercar
Technically French n'est pas?

ETA - Nope, just the brand and the chassis.

Edited by The Wookie on Wednesday 19th December 11:57

tomoleeds

770 posts

186 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Veryon is a much nicer looking car,the rear of this one is UGLY.also with few cars built spares for a 1990 car are not going be available and at half a million who really wants a 12 year old ugly car costing that much,in front of this car would be a F40,for me,also owners of the Veryon have sold up because of the servicing costs,up to 30k a time and 13k for a set of tyres that last 6,000 miles

rob.e

2,861 posts

278 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Twoshoe said:
Baryonyx said:
Always loved these. A thing of beauty!
+1. I personally think they look a lot better than the Veyron.
Agreed, much more style than a veyron IMHO.

PunterCam

1,072 posts

195 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
31 BELIEVED to have been made... I love that, you don't get that anymore.

WorAl

10,877 posts

188 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
tomoleeds said:
Veryon is a much nicer looking car,the rear of this one is UGLY.also with few cars built spares for a 1990 car are not going be available and at half a million who really wants a 12 year old ugly car costing that much,in front of this car would be a F40,for me,also owners of the Veryon have sold up because of the servicing costs,up to 30k a time and 13k for a set of tyres that last 6,000 miles
School holidays already?

Why the hell would someone who has just spent £1,000,000 on a car be worried about £13k for tyres or £30k on servicing? If they've got that much cash to spend on a car, I'd suggest that that months interest on the rest of their wealth will more than enough to cover the costs involved. People have sold because, well, just because. It's what happens, people buy and sell cars.

Mavican

135 posts

164 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
This and an XJ220 please. And definitely this over a Veyron. I mean, where could you really use a Veyron anyway?

Dusty964

6,923 posts

190 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
I would have one of these over virtually any car available, F40 included.
Stunning looking, the one at le mans was superb until utterly crashed.


deltashad

6,731 posts

197 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Mavican said:
This and an XJ220 please. And definitely this over a Veyron. I mean, where could you really use a Veyron anyway?
Quite, old school (or skool to cool people) supercar, looks absolutely stunning....






To me.

Animal

5,250 posts

268 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
WorAl said:
School holidays already?

Why the hell would someone who has just spent £1,000,000 on a car be worried about £13k for tyres or £30k on servicing? If they've got that much cash to spend on a car, I'd suggest that that months interest on the rest of their wealth will more than enough to cover the costs involved. People have sold because, well, just because. It's what happens, people buy and sell cars.
Value/cost?

Pistonwot

413 posts

159 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
Ive always admired the EB110-SS, its a proper sports car with some equally clever engineering tucked away.
As for the looks I like them.
If I was paying that much for a car I would want it to have its own styling and stand apart instead of copying what all the other manufacturers do.
Lead from the front.

Vocal Minority

8,582 posts

152 months

Wednesday 19th December 2012
quotequote all
It's not pretty.

But it is squat and purposeful in a bad ass sort of way. Love it.