RE: Panamera smiles for the camera

RE: Panamera smiles for the camera

Author
Discussion

sisu

2,585 posts

174 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
The reason they choose ML63 or Porsche Cayenne Turbos rather than a guy sitting in a back of a Toyota Hilux is comfort, they need to take 5 people at speed with A/C, seats, seatbelts, airbags etc. The arms are giro stabilsed, counter balanced so if you go over a bump the frame stays still. They need to have a driver, In the passenger seat the director with a monitor, The arm is remote operated by one guy, next to him the cameraman with another remote and lastly a guy to pull focus and be sick.
The Ferrari has a plate mounted under the car, the camera doesn't swing out, but is giro stabilised. the top section go thru where the rear lamps go thru to body of the car. So other than that it is a stock Ferrari which can be converted back easily.

AlexiusG55

655 posts

157 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
V8 FOU said:
I would have thought a Citroen CX or DS would be ideal with its suspension......
It's been done:

but the CX can't keep up for high-speed chase scenes.

biggrim

119 posts

176 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
Looks like Doc Brown has been in the shed again!

kikiturbo

170 posts

228 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
V8 FOU said:
I would have thought a Citroen CX or DS would be ideal with its suspension......
actually, the DS was used by our TV to shoot horse racing.. and a cut DS for film work..

some other citroens..




kikiturbo

170 posts

228 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
there is also a tuned evo 8 and a Cygnet.. LOL

http://www.advancedcameracars.com/mitsubishi_evo.p...

FisiP1

1,279 posts

154 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
dinkel said:
Health and Safety would love this.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

256 months

Tuesday 8th January 2013
quotequote all
umRacing said:
Pistonheads absolutely loves the Panamera and guess what, so do I.
Not a uniform view, if you don't mind.

It might perform, but it looks like the scabby bd son of a three legged camel...

Carnnoisseur

531 posts

155 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
sisu said:
The reason they choose ML63 or Porsche Cayenne Turbos rather than a guy sitting in a back of a Toyota Hilux is comfort, they need to take 5 people at speed with A/C, seats, seatbelts, airbags etc. The arms are giro stabilsed, counter balanced so if you go over a bump the frame stays still. They need to have a driver, In the passenger seat the director with a monitor, The arm is remote operated by one guy, next to him the cameraman with another remote and lastly a guy to pull focus and be sick.
The Ferrari has a plate mounted under the car, the camera doesn't swing out, but is giro stabilised. the top section go thru where the rear lamps go thru to body of the car. So other than that it is a stock Ferrari which can be converted back easily.
Great insight. Also interesting to note that they easily convert back to normal, as the older cars look more "converted for purpose". I guess that also explains why I've never seen a classified ad stating "ex camera car" etc

sisu

2,585 posts

174 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
I asked why they don't use cars with soft plyable suspension like the Citroen or a Crown Victoria and the opposite is true. They want a stiff level platform as the arm isn't effected by the bumps like those older setups were and need to go fast to keep up with the stuff they are filming. Back in the day there would be scafolding on a hacked up van/pickup. They would have to speed up the film to get the sensation of speed or get restricted by the places or what the camera car could do.

ephemera

215 posts

160 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all


skilly1

2,702 posts

196 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
ephemera said:
Brilliant Pic !

After_Shock

8,751 posts

221 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
ephemera said:
Thats how to do it, a bit of string and strapped to the front of a high speed vehicle lol

Tenko

20 posts

140 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
ephemera said:
Who needs health and safety.....

You just need a man with a huge crushable set of balls


dinkel

26,959 posts

259 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
Tenko said:
ephemera said:
Who needs health and safety.....

You just need a man with a huge crushable set of balls
Imagine how many years this guy could tell the same story over and over again: it'll never get dull!

Zumbruk

7,848 posts

261 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Not a uniform view, if you don't mind.

It might perform, but it looks like the scabby bd son of a three legged camel...
It's not as good looking as that.

chasecarinc

1 posts

136 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all

Check out this article from flatsixes.com its the real info!
http://flatsixes.com/cars/porsche-panamera/panamer...

garypotter

1,506 posts

151 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
Tenko said:
ephemera said:
Who needs health and safety.....

You just need a man with a huge crushable set of balls
My thoughts exactly, I wonder what film/ad they were filming? any ideas?

irocfan

40,545 posts

191 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
garypotter said:
Tenko said:
ephemera said:
Who needs health and safety.....

You just need a man with a huge crushable set of balls
My thoughts exactly, I wonder what film/ad they were filming? any ideas?
Gob well and truely smacked!!!

kambites

67,593 posts

222 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
Is that from "Grand Prix"?

Yeloperil

147 posts

208 months

Wednesday 9th January 2013
quotequote all
Carnnoisseur said:
sisu said:
The reason they choose ML63 or Porsche Cayenne Turbos rather than a guy sitting in a back of a Toyota Hilux is comfort, they need to take 5 people at speed with A/C, seats, seatbelts, airbags etc. The arms are giro stabilsed, counter balanced so if you go over a bump the frame stays still. They need to have a driver, In the passenger seat the director with a monitor, The arm is remote operated by one guy, next to him the cameraman with another remote and lastly a guy to pull focus and be sick.
The Ferrari has a plate mounted under the car, the camera doesn't swing out, but is giro stabilised. the top section go thru where the rear lamps go thru to body of the car. So other than that it is a stock Ferrari which can be converted back easily.
Great insight. Also interesting to note that they easily convert back to normal, as the older cars look more "converted for purpose". I guess that also explains why I've never seen a classified ad stating "ex camera car" etc
See: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/1968-ford...

The powder blue Ford GT40 Gulf/Mirage was used as a race car before it was sold in 1970 to Steve McQueen's Solar Productions and gained a second life as a camera car to film McQueen driving a Gulf liveried Porsche 917 in "Le Mans" Now that is seriously cool IMHO.
The GT40 set a record last August when it was sold by RM Auctions in Arizona for $11million which probably explains why it didn't appear in the small ads classifieds!!