John 'O' Groats To Lands End - Our Story & Potential Record?
Discussion
750turbo said:
Schmed said:
They can’t touch him now 6 months have elapsed. I fought the law ...
The greatness about this story is how it clearly sticks two fingers up at the bulls
t road safety nazis’ agenda. Speeding is as socially unacceptable as drink drinking? fk off. The guy’s a hero. Those liberal mother fking pussies can eat st. Good job !
Really? Stick around, you will do well in here...The greatness about this story is how it clearly sticks two fingers up at the bulls
t road safety nazis’ agenda. Speeding is as socially unacceptable as drink drinking? fk off. The guy’s a hero. Those liberal mother fking pussies can eat st. Good job !And this ladies and gentleman is wht thew forums are effectively over for many I believe. A real shame.
k..
Edited by briang9 on Tuesday 29th May 00:18
hairykrishna said:
If there's one thing the police can't stand, it's having blatant disregard for the law rubbed in their faces. I reckon he's getting prosecuted. The lure of getting a smug face picture in the DM. What a pillock.
This.A traffic officer once told me they have the discretion to ignore a lot of things, but can't be seen to be ignoring things. There's a world of difference between doing 90mph on a motorway past a traffic car, and doing it in front of a traffic car AND witnesses. You'll get pulled because they cannot turn a blind eye if anyone else is watching, and not necessarily for the offence itself.
By making the entire DM readership aware of the stunt, this chap has put the police in a no-choice situation. I think it's unimaginable that they were not aware of the JoG-LE run already from this forum, but nothing happened. I bet it does now!
Shame. Those who needed to know already knew. There was no need to brag.
djdest said:
The articles don’t read to me like he has taken the story to the press himself
it says it is from 'Triangle News' who are a 'sell your story'-type agency.he's not dealt directly with the Fail/Scum, but he has posed for photos to the agency.
Incidentally I reckon you could EXACTLY date this from the angle & position of the sun, the Land's End picture at 5:36am seem particularly identifying.
It does look like early September, but someone with better astronomy skills than me (non-existent) could certainly date it.
seiben said:
windymissile said:
Daily Fail said:
...Audi S5 with a 4.2 litre VA engine....
Telegraph Numpty said:
It's a worthy adversary to a police car, with upgraded brakes taking it to 400 brake horsepower,
The Crack Fox said:
If any of the Daily Mail Journos are reading this;
What would Diana have made of this?
What does Cherie Blairs face look like today?
Does your own reflection give you cancer?
Why did I see a brown person in my street last week?
What is the impact of this speeding on house prices?What would Diana have made of this?
What does Cherie Blairs face look like today?
Does your own reflection give you cancer?
Why did I see a brown person in my street last week?
Edited by odie.mod on Tuesday 29th May 15:57
The Crack Fox said:
If any of the Daily Mail Journos are reading this
The Daily Mail is the definition of s
t.But we've all known that for a long time.
The final nail in the coffin was last year when Wikipedia removed the DM from it's list of sources that could be classed as 'news'.
Edited by odie.mod on Tuesday 29th May 15:58
Lord Marylebone said:
The Daily Mail is the definition of s
t.But we've all known that for a long time.
The final nail in the coffin was last year when Wikipedia removed the DM from it's list of sources that could be classed as 'news'.
Edited by odie.mod on Tuesday 29th May 15:58
thelawnet1 said:
Lord Marylebone said:
The Daily Mail is the definition of s
t.But we've all known that for a long time.
The final nail in the coffin was last year when Wikipedia removed the DM from it's list of sources that could be classed as 'news'.
Edited by odie.mod on Tuesday 29th May 15:58
If a Wikipedia doesn't see the Daily Mail as any sort of reliable news source, there is no hope for the filthy rag.
Lord Marylebone said:
Which is the whole point.
If a Wikipedia doesn't see the Daily Mail as any sort of reliable news source, there is no hope for the filthy rag.
No, it shows the prejudices of the Wikipedia editors - The Independent is certainly not more reliable than the Daily Mail, but they don't have a prohibition on that.If a Wikipedia doesn't see the Daily Mail as any sort of reliable news source, there is no hope for the filthy rag.
thelawnet1 said:
Lord Marylebone said:
Which is the whole point.
If a Wikipedia doesn't see the Daily Mail as any sort of reliable news source, there is no hope for the filthy rag.
No, it shows the prejudices of the Wikipedia editors - The Independent is certainly not more reliable than the Daily Mail, but they don't have a prohibition on that.If a Wikipedia doesn't see the Daily Mail as any sort of reliable news source, there is no hope for the filthy rag.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff